Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm

Objective: This study proposes a new classification of posterolateral malleolar fractures and a treatment algorithm. Methods: We divided the posterolateral malleolus, which we considered as the posterior malleolus, from the posteromedial one, which we considered as being part of the medial malleolus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego Yearson, Ignacio Melendez, Federico Anain, Santiago Siniscalchi, Juan Drago
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Medicina e Cirurgia do Tornozelo e Pé - ABTPé 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of the Foot & Ankle
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jfootankle.com/JournalFootAnkle/article/view/1199
id doaj-747f0d2bc3484edc972f70e8efe835b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-747f0d2bc3484edc972f70e8efe835b32021-02-02T17:52:59ZengAssociação Brasileira de Medicina e Cirurgia do Tornozelo e Pé - ABTPéJournal of the Foot & Ankle2675-29802020-12-0114310.30795/jfootankle.2020.v14.11991199Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithmDiego Yearson0Ignacio Melendez1Federico Anain2Santiago Siniscalchi3Juan Drago4Sanatorio de la Trinidad Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Sanatorio de la Trinidad Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CLIMBA Centro de Traumatología, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSanatorio de la Trinidad Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina and Sanatorio de la Trinidad Palermo, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSanatorio de la Trinidad Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSanatorio de la Trinidad Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSanatorio de la Trinidad Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Sanatorio de la Trinidad Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CLIMBA Centro de Traumatología, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaObjective: This study proposes a new classification of posterolateral malleolar fractures and a treatment algorithm. Methods: We divided the posterolateral malleolus, which we considered as the posterior malleolus, from the posteromedial one, which we considered as being part of the medial malleolus fracture. The experience with 77 patients treated from February 2017 to February 2020 was assessed. All of them were assessed by frontal and profile radiographies and computed tomography (CT). Among the parameters to classify these fractures, we believe the most determining ones are fracture size, followed by presence of fracture displacement. Results: Fractures were divided into those whose posterior fragment was 25% smaller than the tibial joint surface and those that compromised more than 25% of this joint. The first group underwent syndesmotic opening and was subclassified into 1A (stable fractures), which do not require surgical treatment, and 1B (unstable), which require syndesmotic stabilization. The second group, which comprised the larger fractures, was subclassified into 2 A (non-displaced fractures, or with a displacement below 2 mm), which underwent percutaneous osteosynthesis, 2B (displaced fractures), and 2C (comminuted fractures), which underwent open reduction and internal fixation using a posterior approach. Conclusion: The classifications published so far are anatomic or descriptive, but none of them proposes a therapeutic algorithm for each type of fracture. We believe it will be helpful for its interpretation and decision-making on the need to perform a posterior approach, prioritizing the anatomical reduction of the joint fragment and resolution of syndesmotic instability linked to each fracture pattern using the most simple and effective method. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series. https://jfootankle.com/JournalFootAnkle/article/view/1199Ankle fractures/classificationAlgorithmsTreatment outcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diego Yearson
Ignacio Melendez
Federico Anain
Santiago Siniscalchi
Juan Drago
spellingShingle Diego Yearson
Ignacio Melendez
Federico Anain
Santiago Siniscalchi
Juan Drago
Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm
Journal of the Foot & Ankle
Ankle fractures/classification
Algorithms
Treatment outcomes
author_facet Diego Yearson
Ignacio Melendez
Federico Anain
Santiago Siniscalchi
Juan Drago
author_sort Diego Yearson
title Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm
title_short Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm
title_full Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm
title_fullStr Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Posterior malleolar fractures. New classification and treatment algorithm
title_sort posterior malleolar fractures. new classification and treatment algorithm
publisher Associação Brasileira de Medicina e Cirurgia do Tornozelo e Pé - ABTPé
series Journal of the Foot & Ankle
issn 2675-2980
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Objective: This study proposes a new classification of posterolateral malleolar fractures and a treatment algorithm. Methods: We divided the posterolateral malleolus, which we considered as the posterior malleolus, from the posteromedial one, which we considered as being part of the medial malleolus fracture. The experience with 77 patients treated from February 2017 to February 2020 was assessed. All of them were assessed by frontal and profile radiographies and computed tomography (CT). Among the parameters to classify these fractures, we believe the most determining ones are fracture size, followed by presence of fracture displacement. Results: Fractures were divided into those whose posterior fragment was 25% smaller than the tibial joint surface and those that compromised more than 25% of this joint. The first group underwent syndesmotic opening and was subclassified into 1A (stable fractures), which do not require surgical treatment, and 1B (unstable), which require syndesmotic stabilization. The second group, which comprised the larger fractures, was subclassified into 2 A (non-displaced fractures, or with a displacement below 2 mm), which underwent percutaneous osteosynthesis, 2B (displaced fractures), and 2C (comminuted fractures), which underwent open reduction and internal fixation using a posterior approach. Conclusion: The classifications published so far are anatomic or descriptive, but none of them proposes a therapeutic algorithm for each type of fracture. We believe it will be helpful for its interpretation and decision-making on the need to perform a posterior approach, prioritizing the anatomical reduction of the joint fragment and resolution of syndesmotic instability linked to each fracture pattern using the most simple and effective method. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.
topic Ankle fractures/classification
Algorithms
Treatment outcomes
url https://jfootankle.com/JournalFootAnkle/article/view/1199
work_keys_str_mv AT diegoyearson posteriormalleolarfracturesnewclassificationandtreatmentalgorithm
AT ignaciomelendez posteriormalleolarfracturesnewclassificationandtreatmentalgorithm
AT federicoanain posteriormalleolarfracturesnewclassificationandtreatmentalgorithm
AT santiagosiniscalchi posteriormalleolarfracturesnewclassificationandtreatmentalgorithm
AT juandrago posteriormalleolarfracturesnewclassificationandtreatmentalgorithm
_version_ 1724292496605839360