Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?

Abstract The editorial comments on a recently published study in which 242 patients, with “stable” chronic kidney disease, recruited during a hospital stay, were randomised either to receiving support from nephrologists (co-management by primary care physicians and nephrologists), or to be managed b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-020-01908-4
id doaj-7477d095356e4de38d82bd96d357a976
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7477d095356e4de38d82bd96d357a9762020-11-25T02:58:34ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692020-07-012111410.1186/s12882-020-01908-4Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?Giorgina Barbara Piccoli0Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TorinoAbstract The editorial comments on a recently published study in which 242 patients, with “stable” chronic kidney disease, recruited during a hospital stay, were randomised either to receiving support from nephrologists (co-management by primary care physicians and nephrologists), or to be managed by primary care physicians with written instructions and nephrology consultations on demand. After a mean follow-up of 4 years, the results in terms of dialysis start, hospitalisation and death were similar for both groups. This study gave the possibility to discuss about the options of follow-up of CKD patients, including on one side the advantage of a greater involvement of primary care physicians, who could oversee care by applying a common set of simplified guidelines, and on the other one the importance of a direct and deep involvement of the specialists that seems necessary in particular if personalised approaches have to be pursuit. The data of the present study are somehow in disagreement with the literature, usually suggesting better outcomes in intensive treatment, in which specialists are directly involved. The literature is heterogeneous, the goals vary and the populations are differently selected. The compliance issue is probably one of the missing pieces of the puzzle, and specific interventions should also be tailored to “reluctant” patients. Guidelines should probably be staring points for improvement, and not the standard of care; the study herein discussed may suggest that primary care physicians may be of great help in granting a good standard of care, hopefully as a baseline for further improvement, and personalised care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-020-01908-4Chronic kidney diseaseChronic careCompliancePrimary care physiciansNephrologyGuidelines
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
spellingShingle Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?
BMC Nephrology
Chronic kidney disease
Chronic care
Compliance
Primary care physicians
Nephrology
Guidelines
author_facet Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
author_sort Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
title Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?
title_short Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?
title_full Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?
title_fullStr Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?
title_full_unstemmed Who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? Do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced CKD or are they the starting point for a new approach?
title_sort who should be responsible for the care of advanced chronic kidney disease? do the guidelines point to the end of nephrology follow-up of advanced ckd or are they the starting point for a new approach?
publisher BMC
series BMC Nephrology
issn 1471-2369
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract The editorial comments on a recently published study in which 242 patients, with “stable” chronic kidney disease, recruited during a hospital stay, were randomised either to receiving support from nephrologists (co-management by primary care physicians and nephrologists), or to be managed by primary care physicians with written instructions and nephrology consultations on demand. After a mean follow-up of 4 years, the results in terms of dialysis start, hospitalisation and death were similar for both groups. This study gave the possibility to discuss about the options of follow-up of CKD patients, including on one side the advantage of a greater involvement of primary care physicians, who could oversee care by applying a common set of simplified guidelines, and on the other one the importance of a direct and deep involvement of the specialists that seems necessary in particular if personalised approaches have to be pursuit. The data of the present study are somehow in disagreement with the literature, usually suggesting better outcomes in intensive treatment, in which specialists are directly involved. The literature is heterogeneous, the goals vary and the populations are differently selected. The compliance issue is probably one of the missing pieces of the puzzle, and specific interventions should also be tailored to “reluctant” patients. Guidelines should probably be staring points for improvement, and not the standard of care; the study herein discussed may suggest that primary care physicians may be of great help in granting a good standard of care, hopefully as a baseline for further improvement, and personalised care.
topic Chronic kidney disease
Chronic care
Compliance
Primary care physicians
Nephrology
Guidelines
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12882-020-01908-4
work_keys_str_mv AT giorginabarbarapiccoli whoshouldberesponsibleforthecareofadvancedchronickidneydiseasedotheguidelinespointtotheendofnephrologyfollowupofadvancedckdoraretheythestartingpointforanewapproach
_version_ 1724706464141934592