The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing

Background. The electronic health record (EHR) has been promoted as a tool to improve quality of patient care, reduce costs, and improve efficiency. There is little data to confirm that the use of EHR has reduced duplicate testing. We sought to evaluate the rate of performance of repeat transthoraci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd C. Kerwin, Harmony Leighton, Kunal Buch, Azriel Avezbadalov, Hormoz Kianfar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1950191
id doaj-7472048f1822444d9557bdd052dad15d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7472048f1822444d9557bdd052dad15d2020-11-24T20:49:17ZengHindawi LimitedCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972016-01-01201610.1155/2016/19501911950191The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate TestingTodd C. Kerwin0Harmony Leighton1Kunal Buch2Azriel Avezbadalov3Hormoz Kianfar4New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens/Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Flushing, NY 11355, USANew York Hospital Medical Center of Queens/Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Flushing, NY 11355, USANew York Hospital Medical Center of Queens/Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Flushing, NY 11355, USANew York Hospital Medical Center of Queens/Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Flushing, NY 11355, USANew York Hospital Medical Center of Queens/Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Flushing, NY 11355, USABackground. The electronic health record (EHR) has been promoted as a tool to improve quality of patient care, reduce costs, and improve efficiency. There is little data to confirm that the use of EHR has reduced duplicate testing. We sought to evaluate the rate of performance of repeat transthoracic echocardiograms before and after the adoption of EHR. Methods. We retrospectively examined the rates of repeat echocardiograms performed before and after the implementation of an EHR system. Results. The baseline rate of repeat testing before EHR was 4.6% at six months and 7.6% at twelve months. In the first year following implementation of EHR, 6.6% of patients underwent a repeat study within 6 months, and 12.9% within twelve months. In the most recent year of EHR usage, 5.7% of patients underwent repeat echocardiography at six months and 11.9% within twelve months. All rates of duplicate testing were significantly higher than their respective pre-EHR rates (p<0.01 for all). Conclusion. Our study failed to demonstrate a reduction in the rate of duplicate echocardiography testing after the implementation of an EHR system. We feel that this data, combined with other recent analyses, should promote a more rigorous assessment of the initial claims of the benefits associated with EHR implementation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1950191
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Todd C. Kerwin
Harmony Leighton
Kunal Buch
Azriel Avezbadalov
Hormoz Kianfar
spellingShingle Todd C. Kerwin
Harmony Leighton
Kunal Buch
Azriel Avezbadalov
Hormoz Kianfar
The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing
Cardiology Research and Practice
author_facet Todd C. Kerwin
Harmony Leighton
Kunal Buch
Azriel Avezbadalov
Hormoz Kianfar
author_sort Todd C. Kerwin
title The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing
title_short The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing
title_full The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing
title_fullStr The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Adoption of an Electronic Health Record on Duplicate Testing
title_sort effect of adoption of an electronic health record on duplicate testing
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Cardiology Research and Practice
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background. The electronic health record (EHR) has been promoted as a tool to improve quality of patient care, reduce costs, and improve efficiency. There is little data to confirm that the use of EHR has reduced duplicate testing. We sought to evaluate the rate of performance of repeat transthoracic echocardiograms before and after the adoption of EHR. Methods. We retrospectively examined the rates of repeat echocardiograms performed before and after the implementation of an EHR system. Results. The baseline rate of repeat testing before EHR was 4.6% at six months and 7.6% at twelve months. In the first year following implementation of EHR, 6.6% of patients underwent a repeat study within 6 months, and 12.9% within twelve months. In the most recent year of EHR usage, 5.7% of patients underwent repeat echocardiography at six months and 11.9% within twelve months. All rates of duplicate testing were significantly higher than their respective pre-EHR rates (p<0.01 for all). Conclusion. Our study failed to demonstrate a reduction in the rate of duplicate echocardiography testing after the implementation of an EHR system. We feel that this data, combined with other recent analyses, should promote a more rigorous assessment of the initial claims of the benefits associated with EHR implementation.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1950191
work_keys_str_mv AT toddckerwin theeffectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT harmonyleighton theeffectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT kunalbuch theeffectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT azrielavezbadalov theeffectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT hormozkianfar theeffectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT toddckerwin effectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT harmonyleighton effectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT kunalbuch effectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT azrielavezbadalov effectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
AT hormozkianfar effectofadoptionofanelectronichealthrecordonduplicatetesting
_version_ 1716806122204037120