Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study

ObjectivesTo establish the proportion of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) diagnosis among people presenting to an emergency department (ED), to determine the accuracy of recorded ED diagnoses. We also aimed to describe challenges in mTBI case identification and its acute hospital management.Design...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilaria Pozzato, Mark Gillett, Kim Van Vu, Susanne Meares, Anthony Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/2/e034494.full
id doaj-746569180339458f9462d6c617dc7612
record_format Article
spelling doaj-746569180339458f9462d6c617dc76122021-07-31T15:30:16ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-02-0110210.1136/bmjopen-2019-034494Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance studyIlaria Pozzato0Mark Gillett1Kim Van Vu2Susanne Meares3Anthony Liang41 John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia 3 Emergency Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 1 John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia 2 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia1 John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, AustraliaObjectivesTo establish the proportion of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) diagnosis among people presenting to an emergency department (ED), to determine the accuracy of recorded ED diagnoses. We also aimed to describe challenges in mTBI case identification and its acute hospital management.Design and settingA retrospective chart review of all ED attendances to a major trauma hospital, over a 9-month period (June 2015–February 2016).ParticipantsAdults aged 18–65 years consecutively presenting to an ED.Primary outcome measuresProportion of mTBI diagnosis among ED attendances (ie, confirmed mTBI based on the WHO criteria or indeterminate mTBI based on secondary criteria), and proportion of accurately recorded mTBI diagnosis by ED clinicians (ie, ‘mTBI’, ‘concussion’).ResultsOf 30 479 ED attendances, 351 (1.15%) confirmed mTBI diagnosis and 180 (0.6%) indeterminate diagnosis were identified. Only 81 (23.1%) individuals with a confirmed mTBI had a ‘mTBI diagnosis’ clearly recorded in the medical notes. Of the allocated discharge diagnosis codes to the two identified cohorts, 89.8% were not indicative of mTBI. Intracranial injuries were found in 31 (8.5%) confirmed cases. Glasgow Coma Scale scores were consistently assessed in the ED but identified only 117 (33.3%) confirmed mTBI cases. Post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) testing was able to confirm acute cognitive impairment in 113 (62.1%) of those who were tested (182, 51.3%).ConclusionsmTBI is a common, but an under-recognised cause for ED attendance. Despite challenges, the use of an operational definition such as the WHO diagnostic criteria can improve accuracy in mTBI identification. Acute management may be enhanced by rapid assessment of PTA.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/2/e034494.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ilaria Pozzato
Mark Gillett
Kim Van Vu
Susanne Meares
Anthony Liang
spellingShingle Ilaria Pozzato
Mark Gillett
Kim Van Vu
Susanne Meares
Anthony Liang
Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
BMJ Open
author_facet Ilaria Pozzato
Mark Gillett
Kim Van Vu
Susanne Meares
Anthony Liang
author_sort Ilaria Pozzato
title Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
title_short Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
title_full Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
title_fullStr Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
title_sort challenges in the acute identification of mild traumatic brain injuries: results from an emergency department surveillance study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-02-01
description ObjectivesTo establish the proportion of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) diagnosis among people presenting to an emergency department (ED), to determine the accuracy of recorded ED diagnoses. We also aimed to describe challenges in mTBI case identification and its acute hospital management.Design and settingA retrospective chart review of all ED attendances to a major trauma hospital, over a 9-month period (June 2015–February 2016).ParticipantsAdults aged 18–65 years consecutively presenting to an ED.Primary outcome measuresProportion of mTBI diagnosis among ED attendances (ie, confirmed mTBI based on the WHO criteria or indeterminate mTBI based on secondary criteria), and proportion of accurately recorded mTBI diagnosis by ED clinicians (ie, ‘mTBI’, ‘concussion’).ResultsOf 30 479 ED attendances, 351 (1.15%) confirmed mTBI diagnosis and 180 (0.6%) indeterminate diagnosis were identified. Only 81 (23.1%) individuals with a confirmed mTBI had a ‘mTBI diagnosis’ clearly recorded in the medical notes. Of the allocated discharge diagnosis codes to the two identified cohorts, 89.8% were not indicative of mTBI. Intracranial injuries were found in 31 (8.5%) confirmed cases. Glasgow Coma Scale scores were consistently assessed in the ED but identified only 117 (33.3%) confirmed mTBI cases. Post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) testing was able to confirm acute cognitive impairment in 113 (62.1%) of those who were tested (182, 51.3%).ConclusionsmTBI is a common, but an under-recognised cause for ED attendance. Despite challenges, the use of an operational definition such as the WHO diagnostic criteria can improve accuracy in mTBI identification. Acute management may be enhanced by rapid assessment of PTA.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/2/e034494.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ilariapozzato challengesintheacuteidentificationofmildtraumaticbraininjuriesresultsfromanemergencydepartmentsurveillancestudy
AT markgillett challengesintheacuteidentificationofmildtraumaticbraininjuriesresultsfromanemergencydepartmentsurveillancestudy
AT kimvanvu challengesintheacuteidentificationofmildtraumaticbraininjuriesresultsfromanemergencydepartmentsurveillancestudy
AT susannemeares challengesintheacuteidentificationofmildtraumaticbraininjuriesresultsfromanemergencydepartmentsurveillancestudy
AT anthonyliang challengesintheacuteidentificationofmildtraumaticbraininjuriesresultsfromanemergencydepartmentsurveillancestudy
_version_ 1721246735821438976