Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

International experts have recommended actions that funders can take to improve the value of research investments. They state that self-assessment and public sharing are the basis for accountability and improvement. We examined our policies and practice to determine the extent to which the Patient-C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evelyn P. Whitlock, Joe V. Selby, Kelly M. Dunham, Alicia Fernandez, Laura P. Forsythe, Grayson Norquist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2019-06-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/8-288/v2
id doaj-74565ed46312448dad8401aa8b4308de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74565ed46312448dad8401aa8b4308de2020-11-25T01:19:33ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022019-06-01810.12688/f1000research.18471.221339Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]Evelyn P. Whitlock0Joe V. Selby1Kelly M. Dunham2Alicia Fernandez3Laura P. Forsythe4Grayson Norquist5Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, 20036, USAPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, 20036, USAPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, 20036, USASan Francisco School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USAPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, 20036, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USAInternational experts have recommended actions that funders can take to improve the value of research investments. They state that self-assessment and public sharing are the basis for accountability and improvement. We examined our policies and practice to determine the extent to which the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s (PCORI) policies and practices as a research funder align with international best practice recommendations. A self-audit of current policies and practice against 17 recommendations and 35 sub-recommendations representing five major stages of research production, based on adapted methods used for self-assessment by another funder, was performed.  Fit of existing PCORI policies and practices with 35 sub-recommendations, qualitative assessment of adequacy (area of strength; area of partial strength; area of growth; not applicable) for 17 recommendations for five stages of research production was assessed. Of the 17 recommendations, 15 were applicable to PCORI’s research mission and focus.  PCORI has policies and practices in place for all elements of six recommendations (“area of strength”) and policies that address each element but with some still in active development for three (“area of partial strength”). PCORI is partially addressing six of the 15 relevant recommendations (“area of growth”). Areas for growth include making study protocols publicly available, improving policies on data sharing, and enhancing collaboration with other funders to reduce redundant funding. A voluntary consortium of international funders is underway to encourage further progress, including additional self-assessment and public sharing for accountability. These findings indicate PCORI has undertaken efforts to align its funding practices with international recommendations to ensure the value of public dollars invested in research.  Further efforts will likely require additional coordination and collaboration between funders and stakeholders.https://f1000research.com/articles/8-288/v2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Evelyn P. Whitlock
Joe V. Selby
Kelly M. Dunham
Alicia Fernandez
Laura P. Forsythe
Grayson Norquist
spellingShingle Evelyn P. Whitlock
Joe V. Selby
Kelly M. Dunham
Alicia Fernandez
Laura P. Forsythe
Grayson Norquist
Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
author_facet Evelyn P. Whitlock
Joe V. Selby
Kelly M. Dunham
Alicia Fernandez
Laura P. Forsythe
Grayson Norquist
author_sort Evelyn P. Whitlock
title Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: an organizational case-study of the patient-centered outcomes research institute [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2019-06-01
description International experts have recommended actions that funders can take to improve the value of research investments. They state that self-assessment and public sharing are the basis for accountability and improvement. We examined our policies and practice to determine the extent to which the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s (PCORI) policies and practices as a research funder align with international best practice recommendations. A self-audit of current policies and practice against 17 recommendations and 35 sub-recommendations representing five major stages of research production, based on adapted methods used for self-assessment by another funder, was performed.  Fit of existing PCORI policies and practices with 35 sub-recommendations, qualitative assessment of adequacy (area of strength; area of partial strength; area of growth; not applicable) for 17 recommendations for five stages of research production was assessed. Of the 17 recommendations, 15 were applicable to PCORI’s research mission and focus.  PCORI has policies and practices in place for all elements of six recommendations (“area of strength”) and policies that address each element but with some still in active development for three (“area of partial strength”). PCORI is partially addressing six of the 15 relevant recommendations (“area of growth”). Areas for growth include making study protocols publicly available, improving policies on data sharing, and enhancing collaboration with other funders to reduce redundant funding. A voluntary consortium of international funders is underway to encourage further progress, including additional self-assessment and public sharing for accountability. These findings indicate PCORI has undertaken efforts to align its funding practices with international recommendations to ensure the value of public dollars invested in research.  Further efforts will likely require additional coordination and collaboration between funders and stakeholders.
url https://f1000research.com/articles/8-288/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT evelynpwhitlock examiningtheroleoffundersinensuringvalueandreducingwasteinresearchanorganizationalcasestudyofthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstituteversion2peerreview2approved
AT joevselby examiningtheroleoffundersinensuringvalueandreducingwasteinresearchanorganizationalcasestudyofthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstituteversion2peerreview2approved
AT kellymdunham examiningtheroleoffundersinensuringvalueandreducingwasteinresearchanorganizationalcasestudyofthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstituteversion2peerreview2approved
AT aliciafernandez examiningtheroleoffundersinensuringvalueandreducingwasteinresearchanorganizationalcasestudyofthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstituteversion2peerreview2approved
AT laurapforsythe examiningtheroleoffundersinensuringvalueandreducingwasteinresearchanorganizationalcasestudyofthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstituteversion2peerreview2approved
AT graysonnorquist examiningtheroleoffundersinensuringvalueandreducingwasteinresearchanorganizationalcasestudyofthepatientcenteredoutcomesresearchinstituteversion2peerreview2approved
_version_ 1725137657226330112