Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.

Rideability, i.e. the ease and comfort with which a horse can be ridden, is considered to be one of the most important traits in riding horses. However, at present rideability is evaluated rather subjectively in breeding horse performance tests. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uta König von Borstel, Chantal Glißman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3906164?pdf=render
id doaj-7444c4b4cc97402497f8661fb7c7f012
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7444c4b4cc97402497f8661fb7c7f0122020-11-25T02:11:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8728510.1371/journal.pone.0087285Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.Uta König von BorstelChantal GlißmanRideability, i.e. the ease and comfort with which a horse can be ridden, is considered to be one of the most important traits in riding horses. However, at present rideability is evaluated rather subjectively in breeding horse performance tests. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role horse behaviour as well as degree and quality of rein tension might play in judges' evaluation of horses' rideability. Mares (n=33) and stallions (n=13) from two different mare- and one stallion-testing station were observed twice during their performance test dressage training. During these rides, rein tension was measured continuously, and frequency of behaviour patterns such as head-tossing, tail swishing, and snorting was recorded. Rein tension parameters showed reasonable repeatabilities within horse-rider pairs (e.g. mean rein tension: r(2)=0.61 ± 0.11; variance of rein tension: r(2)=0.52 ± 0.14). Regression analysis revealed that a larger proportion of variance in rideability scores could be explained by maximum (17%), mean (16%) and variance (15%) of rein tension compared to horses' or riders' behavioural parameters (tail-swishing: 5% and rider's use of hands: 5%, respectively). According to mixed model analysis, rideability scores dropped (all P<0.05) with increasing mean, maximum and variability in rein tension (e.g. -0.37 ± 0.14 scores per additional 10 Newton in mean tension). However, mean rein tension differed between testing stations (P<0.0001) ranging between 9.1 ± 1.6 N in one station and 21.7 ± 1.3 N in another station. These results indicate that quantity and consistency of rein tension is either directly or indirectly an important factor for judges to derive rideability scores. Given the importance of rein tension parameters to both rider comfort and horse welfare, potentially, measurements of rein tension along with behaviour observations assessing the quality of rein contact (e.g. distinguishing a light contact from attempts to evade contact) might be used to make the assessment of rideability more impartial.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3906164?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uta König von Borstel
Chantal Glißman
spellingShingle Uta König von Borstel
Chantal Glißman
Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Uta König von Borstel
Chantal Glißman
author_sort Uta König von Borstel
title Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
title_short Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
title_full Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
title_fullStr Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
title_full_unstemmed Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
title_sort alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Rideability, i.e. the ease and comfort with which a horse can be ridden, is considered to be one of the most important traits in riding horses. However, at present rideability is evaluated rather subjectively in breeding horse performance tests. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role horse behaviour as well as degree and quality of rein tension might play in judges' evaluation of horses' rideability. Mares (n=33) and stallions (n=13) from two different mare- and one stallion-testing station were observed twice during their performance test dressage training. During these rides, rein tension was measured continuously, and frequency of behaviour patterns such as head-tossing, tail swishing, and snorting was recorded. Rein tension parameters showed reasonable repeatabilities within horse-rider pairs (e.g. mean rein tension: r(2)=0.61 ± 0.11; variance of rein tension: r(2)=0.52 ± 0.14). Regression analysis revealed that a larger proportion of variance in rideability scores could be explained by maximum (17%), mean (16%) and variance (15%) of rein tension compared to horses' or riders' behavioural parameters (tail-swishing: 5% and rider's use of hands: 5%, respectively). According to mixed model analysis, rideability scores dropped (all P<0.05) with increasing mean, maximum and variability in rein tension (e.g. -0.37 ± 0.14 scores per additional 10 Newton in mean tension). However, mean rein tension differed between testing stations (P<0.0001) ranging between 9.1 ± 1.6 N in one station and 21.7 ± 1.3 N in another station. These results indicate that quantity and consistency of rein tension is either directly or indirectly an important factor for judges to derive rideability scores. Given the importance of rein tension parameters to both rider comfort and horse welfare, potentially, measurements of rein tension along with behaviour observations assessing the quality of rein contact (e.g. distinguishing a light contact from attempts to evade contact) might be used to make the assessment of rideability more impartial.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3906164?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT utakonigvonborstel alternativestoconventionalevaluationofrideabilityinhorseperformancetestssuitabilityofreintensionandbehaviouralparameters
AT chantalglißman alternativestoconventionalevaluationofrideabilityinhorseperformancetestssuitabilityofreintensionandbehaviouralparameters
_version_ 1724911688359084032