Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War

The present paper analyzes two artistic strategies employed by Gerhard Richter to deal with painful recent cultural memory. Two works in particular reveal the relative success of Richter’s varied artistic strategies addressing contemporary political events: 18. Oktober 1977 (1988) and War Cut (2004)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Schepen Randall K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-08-01
Series:Messages, Sages and Ages
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/msas.2017.4.issue-1/msas-2017-0001/msas-2017-0001.xml?format=INT
id doaj-7438d36cc7924a4ca13e60299ad1a17c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7438d36cc7924a4ca13e60299ad1a17c2020-11-25T01:26:59ZengSciendoMessages, Sages and Ages1844-88362017-08-014172310.1515/msas-2017-0001msas-2017-0001Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and WarVan Schepen Randall K.0Associate Professor of Art and Architectural History School of Architecture, Art and Historic Preservation, Roger Williams University, One Old Ferry Road, Bristol, RI 02809United States of AmericaThe present paper analyzes two artistic strategies employed by Gerhard Richter to deal with painful recent cultural memory. Two works in particular reveal the relative success of Richter’s varied artistic strategies addressing contemporary political events: 18. Oktober 1977 (1988) and War Cut (2004). In his series of paintings on the Baader-Meinhof terrorist group, Richter effectively employs his “photopainting” style to address the profoundly disturbing deaths of the Baader-Meinhof group in the 1970s. Richter chose mundane photographic sources for his imagery, denying a hierarchy of “correct” memories of the events and turning photographic indexicality against itself by employing a painterly medium, tinged with nostalgia, to represent it. Richter’s photopaintings of Baader-Meinhof thus use the “factual” nature of the photograph while also utilizing an elegiac painterly mist through which an indistinct emotional memory of the past seems to emerge. Richter’s blurring of images can thus be understood as a fulcrum on which the undecidability of history itself must be represented. Richter constructs War Cut (2004), on the other hand, as a work and aesthetic experience decidedly at odds with the iconicity of his Baader-Meinhof images by employing arbitrariness and conceptual abstraction.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/msas.2017.4.issue-1/msas-2017-0001/msas-2017-0001.xml?format=INTGerhard Richtercultural memoryterrorismpaintingabstractionrepresentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Van Schepen Randall K.
spellingShingle Van Schepen Randall K.
Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War
Messages, Sages and Ages
Gerhard Richter
cultural memory
terrorism
painting
abstraction
representation
author_facet Van Schepen Randall K.
author_sort Van Schepen Randall K.
title Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War
title_short Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War
title_full Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War
title_fullStr Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War
title_full_unstemmed Gerhard Richter’s Critical Artistic Strategies: Politics, Terrorism and War
title_sort gerhard richter’s critical artistic strategies: politics, terrorism and war
publisher Sciendo
series Messages, Sages and Ages
issn 1844-8836
publishDate 2017-08-01
description The present paper analyzes two artistic strategies employed by Gerhard Richter to deal with painful recent cultural memory. Two works in particular reveal the relative success of Richter’s varied artistic strategies addressing contemporary political events: 18. Oktober 1977 (1988) and War Cut (2004). In his series of paintings on the Baader-Meinhof terrorist group, Richter effectively employs his “photopainting” style to address the profoundly disturbing deaths of the Baader-Meinhof group in the 1970s. Richter chose mundane photographic sources for his imagery, denying a hierarchy of “correct” memories of the events and turning photographic indexicality against itself by employing a painterly medium, tinged with nostalgia, to represent it. Richter’s photopaintings of Baader-Meinhof thus use the “factual” nature of the photograph while also utilizing an elegiac painterly mist through which an indistinct emotional memory of the past seems to emerge. Richter’s blurring of images can thus be understood as a fulcrum on which the undecidability of history itself must be represented. Richter constructs War Cut (2004), on the other hand, as a work and aesthetic experience decidedly at odds with the iconicity of his Baader-Meinhof images by employing arbitrariness and conceptual abstraction.
topic Gerhard Richter
cultural memory
terrorism
painting
abstraction
representation
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/msas.2017.4.issue-1/msas-2017-0001/msas-2017-0001.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT vanschepenrandallk gerhardrichterscriticalartisticstrategiespoliticsterrorismandwar
_version_ 1725107667793346560