Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age

ABSTRACT Objectives Fetal growth and development is a continuum with the optimal time of birth at 39-40 weeks gestation. Internationally, significant changes in clinical practice have seen planned birth (labour induction or pre­labour caesarean section) before 40 completed weeks gestation increas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Bentley, Christine Roberts, Jenny Bowen, Andrew Martin, Jonathan Morris, Natasha Nassar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2017-04-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/157
id doaj-7435f415cebe494581ae04bf1397a3f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7435f415cebe494581ae04bf1397a3f72020-11-25T01:31:16ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082017-04-011110.23889/ijpds.v1i1.157157Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school ageJason Bentley0Christine Roberts1Jenny Bowen2Andrew Martin3Jonathan Morris4Natasha Nassar5Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and The University of SydneyKolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and The University of SydneyDepartment of Neonatology, Royal North Shore HospitalSchool of Education, University of New South WalesKolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District and The University of SydneyMenzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of SydneyABSTRACT Objectives Fetal growth and development is a continuum with the optimal time of birth at 39-40 weeks gestation. Internationally, significant changes in clinical practice have seen planned birth (labour induction or pre­labour caesarean section) before 40 completed weeks gestation increase. Fetal brain development accelerates rapidly in the later stages of pregnancy from 32 weeks gestation, making it vulnerable to disruption from even slightly shortened gestation. This study aimed to investigate the association of gestational age and mode of birth with early childhood development. Approach This study utilised a population-based record-linkage of administrative birth, hospital and development data to obtain a cohort of 153,730 live born infants in New South Wales, Australia. These infants were born between 2002 and 2007, with a gestational age of at least 32 weeks and had an early development assessment in their first year of school in 2009 or 2012. Childhood development was assessed in five main domains (physical health and wellbeing, language and cognitive skills, social competence, emotional maturity, and communication skills and general knowledge) with each comprised of a number of sub-domains. Children with a score below the 10th percentile nationally are considered developmentally vulnerable (DV) in that domain. Children who were DV for two or more of the five main domains are classified as developmentally high risk (DHR) and this was the primary study outcome. Robust multivariable Poisson models were used to obtain individual and combined relative risks for gestational age and mode of birth with DHR, adjusted for maternal demographic, socio-economic, perinatal, and child characteristics. Results Overall, 9.6% of children were DHR. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) (95% confidence interval) of being DHR decreased with increasing gestational age (referent: 40 weeks); 32-33 weeks 1.25 (1.08-1.44), 34­-36 weeks 1.26 (1.18-1.34), 37 weeks 1.17 (1.10-1.25), 38 weeks 1.06 (1.01-­1.10), 39 weeks 0.98 (0.94-1.02), 41+ weeks 0.99 (0.94-­1.03) and for planned birth (referent: vaginal birth following spontaneous labour), 1.07 (1.04­-1.11). The aRR for planned birth at 37 weeks was 1.26 (1.18-­1.34) and at 38 weeks 1.13 (1.08-­1.19). Conclusion Early (<39 weeks gestation) planned birth is associated with an increased risk of poor development in children starting school. Given the timing of planned birth is modifiable, delaying birth for an additional week or more may improve child development. Strategies and interventions to inform more judicious decision making, weighing all the risks and benefits for early planned birth are required to ensure optimal child health and development.https://ijpds.org/article/view/157
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jason Bentley
Christine Roberts
Jenny Bowen
Andrew Martin
Jonathan Morris
Natasha Nassar
spellingShingle Jason Bentley
Christine Roberts
Jenny Bowen
Andrew Martin
Jonathan Morris
Natasha Nassar
Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age
International Journal of Population Data Science
author_facet Jason Bentley
Christine Roberts
Jenny Bowen
Andrew Martin
Jonathan Morris
Natasha Nassar
author_sort Jason Bentley
title Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age
title_short Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age
title_full Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age
title_fullStr Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age
title_full_unstemmed Born a bit too early: A study of early planned birth and child development at school age
title_sort born a bit too early: a study of early planned birth and child development at school age
publisher Swansea University
series International Journal of Population Data Science
issn 2399-4908
publishDate 2017-04-01
description ABSTRACT Objectives Fetal growth and development is a continuum with the optimal time of birth at 39-40 weeks gestation. Internationally, significant changes in clinical practice have seen planned birth (labour induction or pre­labour caesarean section) before 40 completed weeks gestation increase. Fetal brain development accelerates rapidly in the later stages of pregnancy from 32 weeks gestation, making it vulnerable to disruption from even slightly shortened gestation. This study aimed to investigate the association of gestational age and mode of birth with early childhood development. Approach This study utilised a population-based record-linkage of administrative birth, hospital and development data to obtain a cohort of 153,730 live born infants in New South Wales, Australia. These infants were born between 2002 and 2007, with a gestational age of at least 32 weeks and had an early development assessment in their first year of school in 2009 or 2012. Childhood development was assessed in five main domains (physical health and wellbeing, language and cognitive skills, social competence, emotional maturity, and communication skills and general knowledge) with each comprised of a number of sub-domains. Children with a score below the 10th percentile nationally are considered developmentally vulnerable (DV) in that domain. Children who were DV for two or more of the five main domains are classified as developmentally high risk (DHR) and this was the primary study outcome. Robust multivariable Poisson models were used to obtain individual and combined relative risks for gestational age and mode of birth with DHR, adjusted for maternal demographic, socio-economic, perinatal, and child characteristics. Results Overall, 9.6% of children were DHR. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) (95% confidence interval) of being DHR decreased with increasing gestational age (referent: 40 weeks); 32-33 weeks 1.25 (1.08-1.44), 34­-36 weeks 1.26 (1.18-1.34), 37 weeks 1.17 (1.10-1.25), 38 weeks 1.06 (1.01-­1.10), 39 weeks 0.98 (0.94-1.02), 41+ weeks 0.99 (0.94-­1.03) and for planned birth (referent: vaginal birth following spontaneous labour), 1.07 (1.04­-1.11). The aRR for planned birth at 37 weeks was 1.26 (1.18-­1.34) and at 38 weeks 1.13 (1.08-­1.19). Conclusion Early (<39 weeks gestation) planned birth is associated with an increased risk of poor development in children starting school. Given the timing of planned birth is modifiable, delaying birth for an additional week or more may improve child development. Strategies and interventions to inform more judicious decision making, weighing all the risks and benefits for early planned birth are required to ensure optimal child health and development.
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/157
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonbentley bornabittooearlyastudyofearlyplannedbirthandchilddevelopmentatschoolage
AT christineroberts bornabittooearlyastudyofearlyplannedbirthandchilddevelopmentatschoolage
AT jennybowen bornabittooearlyastudyofearlyplannedbirthandchilddevelopmentatschoolage
AT andrewmartin bornabittooearlyastudyofearlyplannedbirthandchilddevelopmentatschoolage
AT jonathanmorris bornabittooearlyastudyofearlyplannedbirthandchilddevelopmentatschoolage
AT natashanassar bornabittooearlyastudyofearlyplannedbirthandchilddevelopmentatschoolage
_version_ 1725087709077176320