The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To develop and psychometrically assess a multiple choice question (MCQ) instrument to test knowledge of depression and its treatments in patients suffering from depression.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 63...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Violato Claudio, Gabriel Adel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-09-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/56
id doaj-742ec9517bfa4a0bab70baf7c3ef3921
record_format Article
spelling doaj-742ec9517bfa4a0bab70baf7c3ef39212020-11-25T00:50:42ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2009-09-01915610.1186/1471-244X-9-56The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessmentViolato ClaudioGabriel Adel<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To develop and psychometrically assess a multiple choice question (MCQ) instrument to test knowledge of depression and its treatments in patients suffering from depression.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 63 depressed patients and twelve psychiatric experts participated. Based on empirical evidence from an extensive review, theoretical knowledge and in consultations with experts, 27-item MCQ knowledge of depression and its treatment test was constructed. Data collected from the psychiatry experts were used to assess evidence of content validity for the instrument.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Cronbach's alpha of the instrument was 0.68, and there was an overall 87.8% agreement (items are highly relevant) between experts about the relevance of the MCQs to test patient knowledge on depression and its treatments. There was an overall satisfactory patients' performance on the MCQs with 78.7% correct answers. Results of an item analysis indicated that most items had adequate difficulties and discriminations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There was adequate reliability and evidence for content and convergent validity for the instrument. Future research should employ a lager and more heterogeneous sample from both psychiatrist and community samples, than did the present study. Meanwhile, the present study has resulted in psychometrically tested instruments for measuring knowledge of depression and its treatment of depressed patients.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/56
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Violato Claudio
Gabriel Adel
spellingShingle Violato Claudio
Gabriel Adel
The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
BMC Psychiatry
author_facet Violato Claudio
Gabriel Adel
author_sort Violato Claudio
title The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
title_short The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
title_full The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
title_fullStr The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
title_full_unstemmed The development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
title_sort development of a knowledge test of depression and its treatment for patients suffering from non-psychotic depression: a psychometric assessment
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychiatry
issn 1471-244X
publishDate 2009-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To develop and psychometrically assess a multiple choice question (MCQ) instrument to test knowledge of depression and its treatments in patients suffering from depression.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 63 depressed patients and twelve psychiatric experts participated. Based on empirical evidence from an extensive review, theoretical knowledge and in consultations with experts, 27-item MCQ knowledge of depression and its treatment test was constructed. Data collected from the psychiatry experts were used to assess evidence of content validity for the instrument.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Cronbach's alpha of the instrument was 0.68, and there was an overall 87.8% agreement (items are highly relevant) between experts about the relevance of the MCQs to test patient knowledge on depression and its treatments. There was an overall satisfactory patients' performance on the MCQs with 78.7% correct answers. Results of an item analysis indicated that most items had adequate difficulties and discriminations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There was adequate reliability and evidence for content and convergent validity for the instrument. Future research should employ a lager and more heterogeneous sample from both psychiatrist and community samples, than did the present study. Meanwhile, the present study has resulted in psychometrically tested instruments for measuring knowledge of depression and its treatment of depressed patients.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/56
work_keys_str_mv AT violatoclaudio thedevelopmentofaknowledgetestofdepressionanditstreatmentforpatientssufferingfromnonpsychoticdepressionapsychometricassessment
AT gabrieladel thedevelopmentofaknowledgetestofdepressionanditstreatmentforpatientssufferingfromnonpsychoticdepressionapsychometricassessment
AT violatoclaudio developmentofaknowledgetestofdepressionanditstreatmentforpatientssufferingfromnonpsychoticdepressionapsychometricassessment
AT gabrieladel developmentofaknowledgetestofdepressionanditstreatmentforpatientssufferingfromnonpsychoticdepressionapsychometricassessment
_version_ 1725247013401919488