Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer
Goniometry is the measurement of joint angles with a conventional universal goniometer (UG) or a digital goniometer (DG). The UG is validated for use in dogs and cats. However, it demands both of the user’s hands when measuring. To avoid this, a novel type of DG has been developed, simplifying measu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2436 |
id |
doaj-74290876876c4098b02c65ce06cffa6a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-74290876876c4098b02c65ce06cffa6a2020-12-20T00:00:53ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-12-01102436243610.3390/ani10122436Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal GoniometerAnna Bergh0Nicole Gandre Lauridsen1Amie Lamoreaux Hesbach2Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, SwedenEmpowerPhysio, 2585CW The Hague, The NetherlandsGoniometry is the measurement of joint angles with a conventional universal goniometer (UG) or a digital goniometer (DG). The UG is validated for use in dogs and cats. However, it demands both of the user’s hands when measuring. To avoid this, a novel type of DG has been developed, simplifying measurement by offering single-hand usage. The objective of this study is to examine the concurrent validity of the DG. The study consists of measurement with the DG and UG for flexion of the carpus and fetlock on ten horses, and with the DG in flexion and neutral positioning of the fetlock on a sedated horse and corresponding radiographs, intra- and inter-tester reliability and a survey on user-friendliness. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a significance of <i>p</i> < 0.05. The study showed significant differences in range of motion for the carpus and fetlock joint, a 2–3° difference comparing measurements on a sedated horse with corresponding radiographs, a “fair” to “excellent” inter-tester reliability and a “fair” to “almost perfect” intra-tester reliability, and the DG was easier to use than the UG. In conclusion, the novel DG may serve as a simple tool for measuring joint motion in equine rehabilitation patients.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2436goniometryequinedigitaluniversaljoint range of motionrehabilitation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Bergh Nicole Gandre Lauridsen Amie Lamoreaux Hesbach |
spellingShingle |
Anna Bergh Nicole Gandre Lauridsen Amie Lamoreaux Hesbach Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer Animals goniometry equine digital universal joint range of motion rehabilitation |
author_facet |
Anna Bergh Nicole Gandre Lauridsen Amie Lamoreaux Hesbach |
author_sort |
Anna Bergh |
title |
Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer |
title_short |
Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer |
title_full |
Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer |
title_fullStr |
Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer |
title_sort |
concurrent validity of equine joint range of motion measurement: a novel digital goniometer versus universal goniometer |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Animals |
issn |
2076-2615 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Goniometry is the measurement of joint angles with a conventional universal goniometer (UG) or a digital goniometer (DG). The UG is validated for use in dogs and cats. However, it demands both of the user’s hands when measuring. To avoid this, a novel type of DG has been developed, simplifying measurement by offering single-hand usage. The objective of this study is to examine the concurrent validity of the DG. The study consists of measurement with the DG and UG for flexion of the carpus and fetlock on ten horses, and with the DG in flexion and neutral positioning of the fetlock on a sedated horse and corresponding radiographs, intra- and inter-tester reliability and a survey on user-friendliness. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with a significance of <i>p</i> < 0.05. The study showed significant differences in range of motion for the carpus and fetlock joint, a 2–3° difference comparing measurements on a sedated horse with corresponding radiographs, a “fair” to “excellent” inter-tester reliability and a “fair” to “almost perfect” intra-tester reliability, and the DG was easier to use than the UG. In conclusion, the novel DG may serve as a simple tool for measuring joint motion in equine rehabilitation patients. |
topic |
goniometry equine digital universal joint range of motion rehabilitation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/12/2436 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annabergh concurrentvalidityofequinejointrangeofmotionmeasurementanoveldigitalgoniometerversusuniversalgoniometer AT nicolegandrelauridsen concurrentvalidityofequinejointrangeofmotionmeasurementanoveldigitalgoniometerversusuniversalgoniometer AT amielamoreauxhesbach concurrentvalidityofequinejointrangeofmotionmeasurementanoveldigitalgoniometerversusuniversalgoniometer |
_version_ |
1724377422389837824 |