Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) measures quantify diffuse fibrosis not readily detectable by conventional late gadolinium (Gd) enhancement (LGE). Ve measurement requires steady state equilibrium between pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jones Bobby L, Kellman Peter, Blair Alexander J, Levenson Joshua E, Ceyrolles William J, Meier Christopher G, Testa Stephen M, Schelbert Erik B, Ludwig Daniel R, Schwartzman David, Shroff Sanjeev G, Wong Timothy C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-03-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Online Access:http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/13/1/16
id doaj-741eface7ba2416b8bc06da9e8f94ae3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-741eface7ba2416b8bc06da9e8f94ae32020-11-25T01:56:30ZengBMCJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1097-66471532-429X2011-03-011311610.1186/1532-429X-13-16Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolusJones Bobby LKellman PeterBlair Alexander JLevenson Joshua ECeyrolles William JMeier Christopher GTesta Stephen MSchelbert Erik BLudwig Daniel RSchwartzman DavidShroff Sanjeev GWong Timothy C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) measures quantify diffuse fibrosis not readily detectable by conventional late gadolinium (Gd) enhancement (LGE). Ve measurement requires steady state equilibrium between plasma and interstitial Gd contrast. While a constant infusion produces steady state, it is unclear whether a simple bolus can do the same. Given the relatively slow clearance of Gd, we hypothesized that a bolus technique accurately measures Ve, thus facilitating integration of myocardial fibrosis quantification into cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) workflow routines. Assuming equivalence between techniques, we further hypothesized that Ve measures would be reproducible across scans.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 10 volunteers (ages 20-81, median 33 yr, 3 females), we compared serial Ve measures from a single short axis slice from two scans: first, during a constant infusion, and second, 12-50 min after a bolus (0.2 mmol/kg gadoteridol) on another day. Steady state during infusion was defined when serial blood and myocardial T1 data varied <5%. We measured T1 on a 1.5 T Siemens scanner using a single-shot modified Look Locker inversion recovery sequence (MOLLI) with balanced SSFP. To shorten breath hold times, T1 values were measured with a shorter sampling scheme that was validated with spin echo relaxometry (TR = 15 sec) in CuSO4-Agar phantoms. Serial infusion vs. bolus Ve measures (n = 205) from the 10 subjects were compared with generalized estimating equations (GEE) with exchangeable correlation matrices. LGE images were also acquired 12-30 minutes after the bolus.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No subject exhibited LGE near the short axis slices where Ve was measured. The Ve range was 19.3-29.2% and 18.4-29.1% by constant infusion and bolus, respectively. In GEE models, serial Ve measures by constant infusion and bolus did not differ significantly (difference = 0.1%, p = 0.38). For both techniques, Ve was strongly related to age (p < 0.01 for both) in GEE models, even after adjusting for heart rate. Both techniques identically sorted older individuals with higher mean Ve values.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Myocardial Ve can be measured reliably and accurately 12-50 minutes after a simple bolus. Ve measures are also reproducible across CMR scans. Ve estimation can be integrated into CMR workflow easily, which may simplify research applications involving the quantification of myocardial fibrosis.</p> http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/13/1/16
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jones Bobby L
Kellman Peter
Blair Alexander J
Levenson Joshua E
Ceyrolles William J
Meier Christopher G
Testa Stephen M
Schelbert Erik B
Ludwig Daniel R
Schwartzman David
Shroff Sanjeev G
Wong Timothy C
spellingShingle Jones Bobby L
Kellman Peter
Blair Alexander J
Levenson Joshua E
Ceyrolles William J
Meier Christopher G
Testa Stephen M
Schelbert Erik B
Ludwig Daniel R
Schwartzman David
Shroff Sanjeev G
Wong Timothy C
Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
author_facet Jones Bobby L
Kellman Peter
Blair Alexander J
Levenson Joshua E
Ceyrolles William J
Meier Christopher G
Testa Stephen M
Schelbert Erik B
Ludwig Daniel R
Schwartzman David
Shroff Sanjeev G
Wong Timothy C
author_sort Jones Bobby L
title Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
title_short Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
title_full Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
title_fullStr Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
title_full_unstemmed Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
title_sort myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
issn 1097-6647
1532-429X
publishDate 2011-03-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) measures quantify diffuse fibrosis not readily detectable by conventional late gadolinium (Gd) enhancement (LGE). Ve measurement requires steady state equilibrium between plasma and interstitial Gd contrast. While a constant infusion produces steady state, it is unclear whether a simple bolus can do the same. Given the relatively slow clearance of Gd, we hypothesized that a bolus technique accurately measures Ve, thus facilitating integration of myocardial fibrosis quantification into cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) workflow routines. Assuming equivalence between techniques, we further hypothesized that Ve measures would be reproducible across scans.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 10 volunteers (ages 20-81, median 33 yr, 3 females), we compared serial Ve measures from a single short axis slice from two scans: first, during a constant infusion, and second, 12-50 min after a bolus (0.2 mmol/kg gadoteridol) on another day. Steady state during infusion was defined when serial blood and myocardial T1 data varied <5%. We measured T1 on a 1.5 T Siemens scanner using a single-shot modified Look Locker inversion recovery sequence (MOLLI) with balanced SSFP. To shorten breath hold times, T1 values were measured with a shorter sampling scheme that was validated with spin echo relaxometry (TR = 15 sec) in CuSO4-Agar phantoms. Serial infusion vs. bolus Ve measures (n = 205) from the 10 subjects were compared with generalized estimating equations (GEE) with exchangeable correlation matrices. LGE images were also acquired 12-30 minutes after the bolus.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No subject exhibited LGE near the short axis slices where Ve was measured. The Ve range was 19.3-29.2% and 18.4-29.1% by constant infusion and bolus, respectively. In GEE models, serial Ve measures by constant infusion and bolus did not differ significantly (difference = 0.1%, p = 0.38). For both techniques, Ve was strongly related to age (p < 0.01 for both) in GEE models, even after adjusting for heart rate. Both techniques identically sorted older individuals with higher mean Ve values.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Myocardial Ve can be measured reliably and accurately 12-50 minutes after a simple bolus. Ve measures are also reproducible across CMR scans. Ve estimation can be integrated into CMR workflow easily, which may simplify research applications involving the quantification of myocardial fibrosis.</p>
url http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/13/1/16
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesbobbyl myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT kellmanpeter myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT blairalexanderj myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT levensonjoshuae myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT ceyrolleswilliamj myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT meierchristopherg myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT testastephenm myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT schelberterikb myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT ludwigdanielr myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT schwartzmandavid myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT shroffsanjeevg myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
AT wongtimothyc myocardialextravascularextracellularvolumefractionmeasurementbygadoliniumcardiovascularmagneticresonanceinhumansslowinfusionversusbolus
_version_ 1724979734747545600