Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.

This study uses several bibliometric indices to explore the temporal course of publication trends regarding the bilingual advantage in executive control over a ten-year window. These indices include the number of published papers, numbers of citations, and the journal impact factor. According to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor A Sanchez-Azanza, Raúl López-Penadés, Lucía Buil-Legaz, Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla, Daniel Adrover-Roig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398607?pdf=render
id doaj-7418dfaf2e3640b78352899aae7b7254
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7418dfaf2e3640b78352899aae7b72542020-11-25T02:05:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01124e017615110.1371/journal.pone.0176151Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.Victor A Sanchez-AzanzaRaúl López-PenadésLucía Buil-LegazEva Aguilar-MediavillaDaniel Adrover-RoigThis study uses several bibliometric indices to explore the temporal course of publication trends regarding the bilingual advantage in executive control over a ten-year window. These indices include the number of published papers, numbers of citations, and the journal impact factor. According to the information available in their abstracts, studies were classified into one of four categories: supporting, ambiguous towards, not mentioning, or challenging the bilingual advantage. Results show that the number of papers challenging the bilingual advantage increased notably in 2014 and 2015. Both the average impact factor and the accumulated citations as of June 2016 were equivalent between categories. However, of the studies published in 2014, those that challenge the bilingual advantage accumulated more citations in June 2016 than those supporting it. Our findings offer evidence-based bibliometric information about the current state of the literature and suggest a change in publication trends regarding the literature on the bilingual advantage.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398607?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victor A Sanchez-Azanza
Raúl López-Penadés
Lucía Buil-Legaz
Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla
Daniel Adrover-Roig
spellingShingle Victor A Sanchez-Azanza
Raúl López-Penadés
Lucía Buil-Legaz
Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla
Daniel Adrover-Roig
Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Victor A Sanchez-Azanza
Raúl López-Penadés
Lucía Buil-Legaz
Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla
Daniel Adrover-Roig
author_sort Victor A Sanchez-Azanza
title Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.
title_short Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.
title_full Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.
title_fullStr Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.
title_full_unstemmed Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach.
title_sort is bilingualism losing its advantage? a bibliometric approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This study uses several bibliometric indices to explore the temporal course of publication trends regarding the bilingual advantage in executive control over a ten-year window. These indices include the number of published papers, numbers of citations, and the journal impact factor. According to the information available in their abstracts, studies were classified into one of four categories: supporting, ambiguous towards, not mentioning, or challenging the bilingual advantage. Results show that the number of papers challenging the bilingual advantage increased notably in 2014 and 2015. Both the average impact factor and the accumulated citations as of June 2016 were equivalent between categories. However, of the studies published in 2014, those that challenge the bilingual advantage accumulated more citations in June 2016 than those supporting it. Our findings offer evidence-based bibliometric information about the current state of the literature and suggest a change in publication trends regarding the literature on the bilingual advantage.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398607?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT victorasanchezazanza isbilingualismlosingitsadvantageabibliometricapproach
AT raullopezpenades isbilingualismlosingitsadvantageabibliometricapproach
AT luciabuillegaz isbilingualismlosingitsadvantageabibliometricapproach
AT evaaguilarmediavilla isbilingualismlosingitsadvantageabibliometricapproach
AT danieladroverroig isbilingualismlosingitsadvantageabibliometricapproach
_version_ 1724938711210131456