Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection

Background: The validity of N classification of the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of the 7th e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sung Jin Oh, Byoung Jo Suh, Jong Kwon Park, Sung Don Oh, Hang Jong Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2017-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/455189
id doaj-7414111b49e14178b00286539b67c465
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7414111b49e14178b00286539b67c4652020-11-25T00:05:05ZengKarger PublishersCase Reports in Oncology1662-65752017-01-01101576510.1159/000455189455189Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative ResectionSung Jin OhByoung Jo SuhJong Kwon ParkSung Don OhHang Jong YuBackground: The validity of N classification of the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of the 7th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system (focusing on N stage), in comparison with the 6th edition, at a single Eastern institution. Methods: We analyzed 1,435 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection performed from September 1998 to August 2003 at the Memorial Jin-Pok Kim Korea Gastric Cancer Center. We analyzed the survival rate of the patients according to the AJCC/UICC 6th and 7th editions, and compared each stage, focusing on N stage. Results: Significant differences in the 5-year survival rates were observed between the 6th and the 7th AJCC/UICC staging system. In the 6th edition staging system, the Kaplan-Meier curves discriminated each N stage significantly. In contrast, there was no difference in terms of survival curves for N stage according to the 7th edition, especially between N1 and N2: the Kaplan-Meier plots of survival curves between N1 (77.0%) and N2 (78.1%) stages overlapped significantly (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although the 7th UICC staging system is a more detailed and sophisticated system in the T category, there was no prognostic significance between the pN1 and pN2 stages according to our data. Therefore, we suggest establishing a new UICC staging system taking into consideration the application of the N stage.http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/455189TNM systemLymph node statusGastric cancer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sung Jin Oh
Byoung Jo Suh
Jong Kwon Park
Sung Don Oh
Hang Jong Yu
spellingShingle Sung Jin Oh
Byoung Jo Suh
Jong Kwon Park
Sung Don Oh
Hang Jong Yu
Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
Case Reports in Oncology
TNM system
Lymph node status
Gastric cancer
author_facet Sung Jin Oh
Byoung Jo Suh
Jong Kwon Park
Sung Don Oh
Hang Jong Yu
author_sort Sung Jin Oh
title Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
title_short Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
title_full Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
title_fullStr Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
title_sort prognostic discrepancy of the 6th and 7th uicc n classification for lymph node staging in gastric cancer patients after curative resection
publisher Karger Publishers
series Case Reports in Oncology
issn 1662-6575
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: The validity of N classification of the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of the 7th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system (focusing on N stage), in comparison with the 6th edition, at a single Eastern institution. Methods: We analyzed 1,435 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection performed from September 1998 to August 2003 at the Memorial Jin-Pok Kim Korea Gastric Cancer Center. We analyzed the survival rate of the patients according to the AJCC/UICC 6th and 7th editions, and compared each stage, focusing on N stage. Results: Significant differences in the 5-year survival rates were observed between the 6th and the 7th AJCC/UICC staging system. In the 6th edition staging system, the Kaplan-Meier curves discriminated each N stage significantly. In contrast, there was no difference in terms of survival curves for N stage according to the 7th edition, especially between N1 and N2: the Kaplan-Meier plots of survival curves between N1 (77.0%) and N2 (78.1%) stages overlapped significantly (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although the 7th UICC staging system is a more detailed and sophisticated system in the T category, there was no prognostic significance between the pN1 and pN2 stages according to our data. Therefore, we suggest establishing a new UICC staging system taking into consideration the application of the N stage.
topic TNM system
Lymph node status
Gastric cancer
url http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/455189
work_keys_str_mv AT sungjinoh prognosticdiscrepancyofthe6thand7thuiccnclassificationforlymphnodestagingingastriccancerpatientsaftercurativeresection
AT byoungjosuh prognosticdiscrepancyofthe6thand7thuiccnclassificationforlymphnodestagingingastriccancerpatientsaftercurativeresection
AT jongkwonpark prognosticdiscrepancyofthe6thand7thuiccnclassificationforlymphnodestagingingastriccancerpatientsaftercurativeresection
AT sungdonoh prognosticdiscrepancyofthe6thand7thuiccnclassificationforlymphnodestagingingastriccancerpatientsaftercurativeresection
AT hangjongyu prognosticdiscrepancyofthe6thand7thuiccnclassificationforlymphnodestagingingastriccancerpatientsaftercurativeresection
_version_ 1725426360317378560