Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand

Forest structural change affects the forest’s growth and the carbon storage. Two treatments, thinning (30% thinning intensity) and underplanting plus thinning, are being implemented in a coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides forest shelterbelt in Eastern China. The vegetation carbon storage significa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiangrong Cheng, Mukui Yu, Tonggui Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830509
id doaj-74076d49626f4bb48fe8920ab9c31422
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74076d49626f4bb48fe8920ab9c314222020-11-25T02:15:05ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/830509830509Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides StandXiangrong Cheng0Mukui Yu1Tonggui Wu2Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Zhejiang 311400, ChinaInstitute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Zhejiang 311400, ChinaInstitute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Zhejiang 311400, ChinaForest structural change affects the forest’s growth and the carbon storage. Two treatments, thinning (30% thinning intensity) and underplanting plus thinning, are being implemented in a coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides forest shelterbelt in Eastern China. The vegetation carbon storage significantly increased in the underplanted and thinned treatments compared with that in the unthinned treatment (P<0.05). The soil and litterfall carbon storage in the underplanted treatment were significantly higher than those in the unthinned treatment (P<0.05). The total forest ecosystem carbon storage in the underplanted and thinned treatments increased by 35.3% and 26.3%, respectively, compared with that in the unthinned treatment, an increase that mainly came from the growth of vegetation aboveground. Total ecosystem carbon storage showed no significant difference between the underplanted and thinned treatments (P>0.05). The soil light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) was significantly higher at the 0–15 cm soil layer in the thinned and underplanted stands compared with that in the unthinned stand (P<0.05). The soil respiration of the underplanted treatment was significantly higher than that of the unthinned treatment only in July (P<0.05). This study concludes that 30% thinning and underplanting after thinning could be more favorable to carbon sequestration for M. glyptostroboides plantations in the coastal areas of Eastern China.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830509
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiangrong Cheng
Mukui Yu
Tonggui Wu
spellingShingle Xiangrong Cheng
Mukui Yu
Tonggui Wu
Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Xiangrong Cheng
Mukui Yu
Tonggui Wu
author_sort Xiangrong Cheng
title Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand
title_short Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand
title_full Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand
title_fullStr Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Forest Structural Change on Carbon Storage in a Coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides Stand
title_sort effect of forest structural change on carbon storage in a coastal metasequoia glyptostroboides stand
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Forest structural change affects the forest’s growth and the carbon storage. Two treatments, thinning (30% thinning intensity) and underplanting plus thinning, are being implemented in a coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides forest shelterbelt in Eastern China. The vegetation carbon storage significantly increased in the underplanted and thinned treatments compared with that in the unthinned treatment (P<0.05). The soil and litterfall carbon storage in the underplanted treatment were significantly higher than those in the unthinned treatment (P<0.05). The total forest ecosystem carbon storage in the underplanted and thinned treatments increased by 35.3% and 26.3%, respectively, compared with that in the unthinned treatment, an increase that mainly came from the growth of vegetation aboveground. Total ecosystem carbon storage showed no significant difference between the underplanted and thinned treatments (P>0.05). The soil light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) was significantly higher at the 0–15 cm soil layer in the thinned and underplanted stands compared with that in the unthinned stand (P<0.05). The soil respiration of the underplanted treatment was significantly higher than that of the unthinned treatment only in July (P<0.05). This study concludes that 30% thinning and underplanting after thinning could be more favorable to carbon sequestration for M. glyptostroboides plantations in the coastal areas of Eastern China.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/830509
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangrongcheng effectofforeststructuralchangeoncarbonstorageinacoastalmetasequoiaglyptostroboidesstand
AT mukuiyu effectofforeststructuralchangeoncarbonstorageinacoastalmetasequoiaglyptostroboidesstand
AT tongguiwu effectofforeststructuralchangeoncarbonstorageinacoastalmetasequoiaglyptostroboidesstand
_version_ 1724897850249183232