Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory

It is proposed to create a new theory of economic development of the North on three primary sources — the Soviet development school, the European school of regional studies, the North American school of frontier studies. Each of these schools relies on a broad conceptual foundation (location of prod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander N. Pilyasov, Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Northern Arctic Federal University 2019-03-01
Series:Арктика и Север
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/upload/iblock/43b/04_Pilyasov_Zamyatina.pdf
id doaj-740077d54a024503ac19a62b5d57c02e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-740077d54a024503ac19a62b5d57c02e2021-07-02T03:33:56ZengNorthern Arctic Federal UniversityАрктика и Север2221-26982221-26982019-03-0134466210.17238/issn2221-2698.2019.34.57Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theoryAlexander N. Pilyasov0Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina1Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia It is proposed to create a new theory of economic development of the North on three primary sources — the Soviet development school, the European school of regional studies, the North American school of frontier studies. Each of these schools relies on a broad conceptual foundation (location of productive forces, endogenous economic growth, innovative search), the fusion of which is capable of radically and positively transforming the theory of modern time. Comparison of the nature of the development process today and in the Soviet times reveals significant differences: an increase in spatial and temporal irregularity (polarization), multiactorism, glocalization, and the role of the grassroots “design” level. Numerous projects of new development implemented in the Russian Arctic and the North have common features in the form of an experimental nature, pilot-clone schemes for saving on experience, a plurality of equal status supply and training bases, etc. Large resource corporations that lead the world are directing actors of the territorial structure of the process of new development, and it depends on the internal organizational and institutional structure of the company itself. http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/upload/iblock/43b/04_Pilyasov_Zamyatina.pdfthe North and the Arctic developmentglocalitySoviet theory of colonizationfrontier theoryendogenous economic growth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander N. Pilyasov
Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina
spellingShingle Alexander N. Pilyasov
Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina
Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
Арктика и Север
the North and the Arctic development
glocality
Soviet theory of colonization
frontier theory
endogenous economic growth
author_facet Alexander N. Pilyasov
Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina
author_sort Alexander N. Pilyasov
title Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
title_short Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
title_full Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
title_fullStr Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
title_full_unstemmed Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
title_sort development of the north 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
publisher Northern Arctic Federal University
series Арктика и Север
issn 2221-2698
2221-2698
publishDate 2019-03-01
description It is proposed to create a new theory of economic development of the North on three primary sources — the Soviet development school, the European school of regional studies, the North American school of frontier studies. Each of these schools relies on a broad conceptual foundation (location of productive forces, endogenous economic growth, innovative search), the fusion of which is capable of radically and positively transforming the theory of modern time. Comparison of the nature of the development process today and in the Soviet times reveals significant differences: an increase in spatial and temporal irregularity (polarization), multiactorism, glocalization, and the role of the grassroots “design” level. Numerous projects of new development implemented in the Russian Arctic and the North have common features in the form of an experimental nature, pilot-clone schemes for saving on experience, a plurality of equal status supply and training bases, etc. Large resource corporations that lead the world are directing actors of the territorial structure of the process of new development, and it depends on the internal organizational and institutional structure of the company itself.
topic the North and the Arctic development
glocality
Soviet theory of colonization
frontier theory
endogenous economic growth
url http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/upload/iblock/43b/04_Pilyasov_Zamyatina.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandernpilyasov developmentofthenorth20challengesofmakinganewtheory
AT nadezhdayuzamyatina developmentofthenorth20challengesofmakinganewtheory
_version_ 1721341377218871296