Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory
It is proposed to create a new theory of economic development of the North on three primary sources — the Soviet development school, the European school of regional studies, the North American school of frontier studies. Each of these schools relies on a broad conceptual foundation (location of prod...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Northern Arctic Federal University
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Арктика и Север |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/upload/iblock/43b/04_Pilyasov_Zamyatina.pdf |
id |
doaj-740077d54a024503ac19a62b5d57c02e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-740077d54a024503ac19a62b5d57c02e2021-07-02T03:33:56ZengNorthern Arctic Federal UniversityАрктика и Север2221-26982221-26982019-03-0134466210.17238/issn2221-2698.2019.34.57Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theoryAlexander N. Pilyasov0Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina1Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia It is proposed to create a new theory of economic development of the North on three primary sources — the Soviet development school, the European school of regional studies, the North American school of frontier studies. Each of these schools relies on a broad conceptual foundation (location of productive forces, endogenous economic growth, innovative search), the fusion of which is capable of radically and positively transforming the theory of modern time. Comparison of the nature of the development process today and in the Soviet times reveals significant differences: an increase in spatial and temporal irregularity (polarization), multiactorism, glocalization, and the role of the grassroots “design” level. Numerous projects of new development implemented in the Russian Arctic and the North have common features in the form of an experimental nature, pilot-clone schemes for saving on experience, a plurality of equal status supply and training bases, etc. Large resource corporations that lead the world are directing actors of the territorial structure of the process of new development, and it depends on the internal organizational and institutional structure of the company itself. http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/upload/iblock/43b/04_Pilyasov_Zamyatina.pdfthe North and the Arctic developmentglocalitySoviet theory of colonizationfrontier theoryendogenous economic growth |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexander N. Pilyasov Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina |
spellingShingle |
Alexander N. Pilyasov Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory Арктика и Север the North and the Arctic development glocality Soviet theory of colonization frontier theory endogenous economic growth |
author_facet |
Alexander N. Pilyasov Nadezhda Yu. Zamyatina |
author_sort |
Alexander N. Pilyasov |
title |
Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory |
title_short |
Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory |
title_full |
Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory |
title_fullStr |
Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of the North 2.0: challenges of making a new theory |
title_sort |
development of the north 2.0: challenges of making a new theory |
publisher |
Northern Arctic Federal University |
series |
Арктика и Север |
issn |
2221-2698 2221-2698 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
It is proposed to create a new theory of economic development of the North on three primary sources — the Soviet development school, the European school of regional studies, the North American school of frontier studies. Each of these schools relies on a broad conceptual foundation (location of productive forces, endogenous economic growth, innovative search), the fusion of which is capable of radically and positively transforming the theory of modern time. Comparison of the nature of the development process today and in the Soviet times reveals significant differences: an increase in spatial and temporal irregularity (polarization), multiactorism, glocalization, and the role of the grassroots “design” level. Numerous projects of new development implemented in the Russian Arctic and the North have common features in the form of an experimental nature, pilot-clone schemes for saving on experience, a plurality of equal status supply and training bases, etc. Large resource corporations that lead the world are directing actors of the territorial structure of the process of new development, and it depends on the internal organizational and institutional structure of the company itself. |
topic |
the North and the Arctic development glocality Soviet theory of colonization frontier theory endogenous economic growth |
url |
http://www.arcticandnorth.ru/upload/iblock/43b/04_Pilyasov_Zamyatina.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandernpilyasov developmentofthenorth20challengesofmakinganewtheory AT nadezhdayuzamyatina developmentofthenorth20challengesofmakinganewtheory |
_version_ |
1721341377218871296 |