Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports

An array of developments impacting the financial services industry, such as increasing complexity, interconnectedness, third party dependencies and digitalization, means operational resilience will remain a significant area of concern for policy makers, investors and customers. The purpose of this s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Leo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Risks
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/4/128
id doaj-73e021382e9a4e4bb5071165060322e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73e021382e9a4e4bb5071165060322e72020-12-02T00:00:33ZengMDPI AGRisks2227-90912020-12-01812812810.3390/risks8040128Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual ReportsMartin Leo0The Department of Finance, S P Jain School of Global Management, 10 Hyderabad Road, Singapore 119579, SingaporeAn array of developments impacting the financial services industry, such as increasing complexity, interconnectedness, third party dependencies and digitalization, means operational resilience will remain a significant area of concern for policy makers, investors and customers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if banks are disclosing information on their operational resilience risk. The study initially reviews the regulatory landscape for operational resiliency. The recent annual reports of the GSIB banks are reviewed to identify if they have made references to operational resilience. Through text mining, a frequency analysis of terms related to operational resilience was done, followed by an evaluation to understand the existence of relationships between these terms. The study shows that the regulatory guidance for operational resilience is still evolving with much of the current impetus on cybersecurity. There is a notable gap between banks that have reported on operational resiliency and those that have not, with a few patterns visible. Research in the area of operational resilience is relatively new and limited, and this research for the first time analyses the disclosures related to operational resilience in annual reports. Further, for policymakers, it highlights the disparity in disclosures around this relatively new area of risk, thus calling for additional regulatory guidance.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/4/128operational resilienceoperational riskbankGSIB
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Leo
spellingShingle Martin Leo
Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports
Risks
operational resilience
operational risk
bank
GSIB
author_facet Martin Leo
author_sort Martin Leo
title Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports
title_short Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports
title_full Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports
title_fullStr Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports
title_full_unstemmed Operational Resilience Disclosures by Banks: Analysis of Annual Reports
title_sort operational resilience disclosures by banks: analysis of annual reports
publisher MDPI AG
series Risks
issn 2227-9091
publishDate 2020-12-01
description An array of developments impacting the financial services industry, such as increasing complexity, interconnectedness, third party dependencies and digitalization, means operational resilience will remain a significant area of concern for policy makers, investors and customers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if banks are disclosing information on their operational resilience risk. The study initially reviews the regulatory landscape for operational resiliency. The recent annual reports of the GSIB banks are reviewed to identify if they have made references to operational resilience. Through text mining, a frequency analysis of terms related to operational resilience was done, followed by an evaluation to understand the existence of relationships between these terms. The study shows that the regulatory guidance for operational resilience is still evolving with much of the current impetus on cybersecurity. There is a notable gap between banks that have reported on operational resiliency and those that have not, with a few patterns visible. Research in the area of operational resilience is relatively new and limited, and this research for the first time analyses the disclosures related to operational resilience in annual reports. Further, for policymakers, it highlights the disparity in disclosures around this relatively new area of risk, thus calling for additional regulatory guidance.
topic operational resilience
operational risk
bank
GSIB
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/4/128
work_keys_str_mv AT martinleo operationalresiliencedisclosuresbybanksanalysisofannualreports
_version_ 1724410615596843008