Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today

“Those familiar with archival research know that one can go on leafing through innumerable files and quickly inspecting the contents of countless boxes before coming to a sudden halt, arrested by a document which could be scrutinized for years. […] Once again we come back to Ansatzpunkte: the specif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carlop Ginzburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2014-03-01
Series:Cromohs: Cyber Review of Modern Historiography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://fupress.net/index.php/cromohs/article/view/14122/13124
id doaj-73d53c94033f4983aca1dc5cfcac7abf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73d53c94033f4983aca1dc5cfcac7abf2020-11-25T02:52:03ZengFirenze University PressCromohs: Cyber Review of Modern Historiography1123-70231123-70232014-03-0120131897114Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, TodayCarlop Ginzburg0UCLA / Scuola Normale of Pisa“Those familiar with archival research know that one can go on leafing through innumerable files and quickly inspecting the contents of countless boxes before coming to a sudden halt, arrested by a document which could be scrutinized for years. […] Once again we come back to Ansatzpunkte: the specific points which, as Auerbach argued, can provide the seeds for a detailed research program provided with a generalizing potential – in other words, a case. Anomalous cases are especially promising, since anomalies, as Kierkegaard once noted, are richer, from a cognitive point of view, than norms, insofar as the former invariably includes the latter – but not the other way round.” First published in Historical Knowledge. In Quest of Theory, Method and Evidence, ed. by Susanna Fellman and Marjatta Rahikainen (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012), pp. 97–119, Ginzburg's paper has been republished on Cromohs 18 (2013) with the permission of the Author, the Editors, and Cambridge Scholars Publishing.http://fupress.net/index.php/cromohs/article/view/14122/13124• Carlo GinzburgIinteR-La+bBalzan Foundationthe historian's craftmicrohistoryAnsatzpunkteAuerbachanomalycasenorm
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlop Ginzburg
spellingShingle Carlop Ginzburg
Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today
Cromohs: Cyber Review of Modern Historiography
• Carlo Ginzburg
IinteR-La+b
Balzan Foundation
the historian's craft
microhistory
Ansatzpunkte
Auerbach
anomaly
case
norm
author_facet Carlop Ginzburg
author_sort Carlop Ginzburg
title Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today
title_short Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today
title_full Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today
title_fullStr Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today
title_full_unstemmed Our Words, and Theirs: A Reflection on the Historian’s Craft, Today
title_sort our words, and theirs: a reflection on the historian’s craft, today
publisher Firenze University Press
series Cromohs: Cyber Review of Modern Historiography
issn 1123-7023
1123-7023
publishDate 2014-03-01
description “Those familiar with archival research know that one can go on leafing through innumerable files and quickly inspecting the contents of countless boxes before coming to a sudden halt, arrested by a document which could be scrutinized for years. […] Once again we come back to Ansatzpunkte: the specific points which, as Auerbach argued, can provide the seeds for a detailed research program provided with a generalizing potential – in other words, a case. Anomalous cases are especially promising, since anomalies, as Kierkegaard once noted, are richer, from a cognitive point of view, than norms, insofar as the former invariably includes the latter – but not the other way round.” First published in Historical Knowledge. In Quest of Theory, Method and Evidence, ed. by Susanna Fellman and Marjatta Rahikainen (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012), pp. 97–119, Ginzburg's paper has been republished on Cromohs 18 (2013) with the permission of the Author, the Editors, and Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
topic • Carlo Ginzburg
IinteR-La+b
Balzan Foundation
the historian's craft
microhistory
Ansatzpunkte
Auerbach
anomaly
case
norm
url http://fupress.net/index.php/cromohs/article/view/14122/13124
work_keys_str_mv AT carlopginzburg ourwordsandtheirsareflectiononthehistorianscrafttoday
_version_ 1724731658109714432