Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries

The web’s historical periodization as Web 1.0 (“read-only”) and Web 2.0 (“read/write”) eras continues to hold sway even as the umbrella term “social media” has become the preferred way to talk about today’s ecosystem of connective media. Yet, we have much to gain by not exclusively positing social m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Megan Sapnar Ankerson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-12-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621935
id doaj-73c86062c58d4d97b8e51469756d3858
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73c86062c58d4d97b8e51469756d38582020-11-25T03:07:31ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512015-12-01110.1177/205630511562193510.1177_2056305115621935Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical BoundariesMegan Sapnar AnkersonThe web’s historical periodization as Web 1.0 (“read-only”) and Web 2.0 (“read/write”) eras continues to hold sway even as the umbrella term “social media” has become the preferred way to talk about today’s ecosystem of connective media. Yet, we have much to gain by not exclusively positing social media platforms as a 21st-century phenomenon. Through case studies of two commercially sponsored web projects from the mid-1990s—Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab’s Day in the Life of Cyberspace and Rick Smolan’s 24 Hours in Cyberspace —this article examines how notions of social and publics were imagined and designed into the web at the start of the dot-com boom. In lieu of a discourse of versions, I draw on Lucy Suchman’s trope of configuration as an analytic tool for rethinking web historiography. By tracing how cultural imaginaries of the Internet as a public space are conjoined with technological artifacts (content management systems, templates, session tracking, and e-commerce platforms) and reconfigured over time, the discourses of “read-only publishing” and the “social media revolution” can be reframed not as exclusively oppositional logics, but rather, as mutually informing the design and development of today’s social, commercial, web.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621935
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan Sapnar Ankerson
spellingShingle Megan Sapnar Ankerson
Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries
Social Media + Society
author_facet Megan Sapnar Ankerson
author_sort Megan Sapnar Ankerson
title Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries
title_short Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries
title_full Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries
title_fullStr Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries
title_full_unstemmed Social Media and the “Read-Only” Web: Reconfiguring Social Logics and Historical Boundaries
title_sort social media and the “read-only” web: reconfiguring social logics and historical boundaries
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2015-12-01
description The web’s historical periodization as Web 1.0 (“read-only”) and Web 2.0 (“read/write”) eras continues to hold sway even as the umbrella term “social media” has become the preferred way to talk about today’s ecosystem of connective media. Yet, we have much to gain by not exclusively positing social media platforms as a 21st-century phenomenon. Through case studies of two commercially sponsored web projects from the mid-1990s—Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab’s Day in the Life of Cyberspace and Rick Smolan’s 24 Hours in Cyberspace —this article examines how notions of social and publics were imagined and designed into the web at the start of the dot-com boom. In lieu of a discourse of versions, I draw on Lucy Suchman’s trope of configuration as an analytic tool for rethinking web historiography. By tracing how cultural imaginaries of the Internet as a public space are conjoined with technological artifacts (content management systems, templates, session tracking, and e-commerce platforms) and reconfigured over time, the discourses of “read-only publishing” and the “social media revolution” can be reframed not as exclusively oppositional logics, but rather, as mutually informing the design and development of today’s social, commercial, web.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621935
work_keys_str_mv AT megansapnarankerson socialmediaandthereadonlywebreconfiguringsociallogicsandhistoricalboundaries
_version_ 1724669957186256896