International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?

Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen, Carmelo Mazza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2011-06-01
Series:Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1970
id doaj-73b6e0ab199644208aebafe80ecda6ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73b6e0ab199644208aebafe80ecda6ee2020-11-25T03:59:06ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252011-06-013210.3384/cu.2000.1525.113139International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen0Carmelo Mazza1Creative Industries Research Centre, CBS, DenmarkBusiness School in Madrid, Spain Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ’Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals. https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1970Film festivalslate adopterslegitimacyinstitutional work
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen
Carmelo Mazza
spellingShingle Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen
Carmelo Mazza
International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Film festivals
late adopters
legitimacy
institutional work
author_facet Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen
Carmelo Mazza
author_sort Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen
title International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
title_short International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
title_full International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
title_fullStr International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
title_full_unstemmed International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
title_sort international film festivals: for the benefit of whom?
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
issn 2000-1525
publishDate 2011-06-01
description Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ’Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals.
topic Film festivals
late adopters
legitimacy
institutional work
url https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1970
work_keys_str_mv AT jesperstrandgaardpedersen internationalfilmfestivalsforthebenefitofwhom
AT carmelomazza internationalfilmfestivalsforthebenefitofwhom
_version_ 1724455501720190976