International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?
Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Linköping University Electronic Press
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1970 |
id |
doaj-73b6e0ab199644208aebafe80ecda6ee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-73b6e0ab199644208aebafe80ecda6ee2020-11-25T03:59:06ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252011-06-013210.3384/cu.2000.1525.113139International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom?Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen0Carmelo Mazza1Creative Industries Research Centre, CBS, DenmarkBusiness School in Madrid, Spain Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ’Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals. https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1970Film festivalslate adopterslegitimacyinstitutional work |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen Carmelo Mazza |
spellingShingle |
Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen Carmelo Mazza International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom? Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research Film festivals late adopters legitimacy institutional work |
author_facet |
Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen Carmelo Mazza |
author_sort |
Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen |
title |
International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom? |
title_short |
International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom? |
title_full |
International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom? |
title_fullStr |
International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom? |
title_full_unstemmed |
International Film Festivals: For the Benefit of Whom? |
title_sort |
international film festivals: for the benefit of whom? |
publisher |
Linköping University Electronic Press |
series |
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research |
issn |
2000-1525 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
Film festivals have become a widespread phenomenon over the last fifty years and are leading events establishing the reputation of film professionals and constitute a well-established field in itself. Studying the cities of Copenhagen and Rome the authors are asking why the public authorities of these cities establish their own film festivals in an lready saturated field of international film festivals? The focus is on the strategic responses and work made by two late adopters of film festivals – Copenhagen and Rome and their international film festivals, CIFF and ’Festa del Cinema di Roma’ (FCR). The comparative case study is based on qualitative data and methods. It investigates how the two festivals establish, legitimate and position themselves within the existing, institutionalised field of international film festivals. Combining the classical work on early and late adopters in the diffusion of ideas and practices (Tolbert & Zucker 1983) with forms of legitimacy (Suchman 1995) and institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby 2006), it is demonstrated how different and sometimes conflicting demands from various stakeholders, like public authorities and the film industry, have shaped the frames used to position and legitimize the film festivals.
|
topic |
Film festivals late adopters legitimacy institutional work |
url |
https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1970 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jesperstrandgaardpedersen internationalfilmfestivalsforthebenefitofwhom AT carmelomazza internationalfilmfestivalsforthebenefitofwhom |
_version_ |
1724455501720190976 |