Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.

Most studies on perceptions of social structures in organizations rely on cross-sectional evidence and lack a longitudinal perspective. In order to address this gap, we collected whole network perception data at three time points from a cohort of MBA students. First, we asked whether or not individu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Güneş Ertan, Michael D Siciliano, Deniz Yenigün
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218607
id doaj-739ca5efadce4f06930fdd7c580fc6fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-739ca5efadce4f06930fdd7c580fc6fb2021-03-03T20:37:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e021860710.1371/journal.pone.0218607Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.Güneş ErtanMichael D SicilianoDeniz YenigünMost studies on perceptions of social structures in organizations rely on cross-sectional evidence and lack a longitudinal perspective. In order to address this gap, we collected whole network perception data at three time points from a cohort of MBA students. First, we asked whether or not individuals become more accurate in their perception of the network over time. We found no significant increase in accuracy. Second, we examined one's perception of his or her own direct ties and found a consistent tendency to inflate incoming friendship ties, confirming existing studies. However, we find that individuals were quite capable of recognizing the broader dynamics of social hierarchy (i.e., whether they were becoming more or less popular) even as they became no more accurate in understanding either the overall networks or their own ego-net. Third, we explored possible explanations for the persistence of perception errors and showed that most of the errors at time point two and time point three were due to a failure to update previous perception decisions. Finally, we shifted the analysis from accuracy at a given time point and considered the narrative arc of dyadic relations. Our findings suggest that stable dyads across time are more likely to be accurately perceived whereas other types of dyads are poorly tracked. We conclude by presenting possible research questions for future studies to further our understanding of the temporal aspects of network perception.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218607
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Güneş Ertan
Michael D Siciliano
Deniz Yenigün
spellingShingle Güneş Ertan
Michael D Siciliano
Deniz Yenigün
Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Güneş Ertan
Michael D Siciliano
Deniz Yenigün
author_sort Güneş Ertan
title Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
title_short Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
title_full Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
title_fullStr Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
title_full_unstemmed Perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
title_sort perception accuracy, biases and path dependency in longitudinal social networks.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Most studies on perceptions of social structures in organizations rely on cross-sectional evidence and lack a longitudinal perspective. In order to address this gap, we collected whole network perception data at three time points from a cohort of MBA students. First, we asked whether or not individuals become more accurate in their perception of the network over time. We found no significant increase in accuracy. Second, we examined one's perception of his or her own direct ties and found a consistent tendency to inflate incoming friendship ties, confirming existing studies. However, we find that individuals were quite capable of recognizing the broader dynamics of social hierarchy (i.e., whether they were becoming more or less popular) even as they became no more accurate in understanding either the overall networks or their own ego-net. Third, we explored possible explanations for the persistence of perception errors and showed that most of the errors at time point two and time point three were due to a failure to update previous perception decisions. Finally, we shifted the analysis from accuracy at a given time point and considered the narrative arc of dyadic relations. Our findings suggest that stable dyads across time are more likely to be accurately perceived whereas other types of dyads are poorly tracked. We conclude by presenting possible research questions for future studies to further our understanding of the temporal aspects of network perception.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218607
work_keys_str_mv AT gunesertan perceptionaccuracybiasesandpathdependencyinlongitudinalsocialnetworks
AT michaeldsiciliano perceptionaccuracybiasesandpathdependencyinlongitudinalsocialnetworks
AT denizyenigun perceptionaccuracybiasesandpathdependencyinlongitudinalsocialnetworks
_version_ 1714821525075394560