The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Rocuronium-associated injection pain/withdrawal response (RAIPWR) was non-ideal but occurred frequently when injection intravenously during anesthesia induction. Many studies had reported that pretreating with antipyretic analgesics (AAs) could reduce the occurrence of RAIPWR, bu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia Wang, Yu Cui, Bin Liu, Jianfeng Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-020-00990-3
id doaj-73985f6187884bfaad700cb1b21a7936
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73985f6187884bfaad700cb1b21a79362020-11-25T03:28:26ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532020-04-012011910.1186/s12871-020-00990-3The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysisJia Wang0Yu Cui1Bin Liu2Jianfeng Chen3West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengdu Women’s & Children’s Central HospitalWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityAbstract Background Rocuronium-associated injection pain/withdrawal response (RAIPWR) was non-ideal but occurred frequently when injection intravenously during anesthesia induction. Many studies had reported that pretreating with antipyretic analgesics (AAs) could reduce the occurrence of RAIPWR, but there was no consensus yet. Therefore, this meta-analysis was designed to systematically evaluate the benefits of AAs on RAIPWR in patients. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, EMbase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data were searched by January 1st 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applying AAs to alleviate RAIPWR in patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia. Two investigators assessed quality of RCTs and extracted data respectively and the meta-analysis was carried on Revman 5.3 software. Moreover, we compared AAs in pros and cons directly with lidocaine, the most reported medicine to prevent RAIPWR. Results Data were analyzed from 9 RCTs totaling 819 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, pretreating with AAs could prevent the total occurrence of RAIPWR [Risk ratio (RR), 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42 to 0.66; P < 0.0001], and took effect on moderate (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P < 0.0001) and severe RAIPWR (RR = 0.14; 95%CI, 0.08 to 0.24; P < 0.00001). When compared to lidocaine, the preventive effect was not so excellent as the latter but injection pain induced by prophylactic occurred less. Conclusion The currently available evidence suggested that pretreating with AAs intravenously could alleviate RAIPWR. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42019129776 .http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-020-00990-3RocuroniumInjection painWithdrawal responseAntipyretic analgesicsMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jia Wang
Yu Cui
Bin Liu
Jianfeng Chen
spellingShingle Jia Wang
Yu Cui
Bin Liu
Jianfeng Chen
The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Anesthesiology
Rocuronium
Injection pain
Withdrawal response
Antipyretic analgesics
Meta-analysis
author_facet Jia Wang
Yu Cui
Bin Liu
Jianfeng Chen
author_sort Jia Wang
title The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of Antipyretic Analgesics administration intravenously for Preventing Rocuronium-Associated Pain/Withdrawal Response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of antipyretic analgesics administration intravenously for preventing rocuronium-associated pain/withdrawal response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Anesthesiology
issn 1471-2253
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Background Rocuronium-associated injection pain/withdrawal response (RAIPWR) was non-ideal but occurred frequently when injection intravenously during anesthesia induction. Many studies had reported that pretreating with antipyretic analgesics (AAs) could reduce the occurrence of RAIPWR, but there was no consensus yet. Therefore, this meta-analysis was designed to systematically evaluate the benefits of AAs on RAIPWR in patients. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, EMbase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data were searched by January 1st 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applying AAs to alleviate RAIPWR in patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia. Two investigators assessed quality of RCTs and extracted data respectively and the meta-analysis was carried on Revman 5.3 software. Moreover, we compared AAs in pros and cons directly with lidocaine, the most reported medicine to prevent RAIPWR. Results Data were analyzed from 9 RCTs totaling 819 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, pretreating with AAs could prevent the total occurrence of RAIPWR [Risk ratio (RR), 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42 to 0.66; P < 0.0001], and took effect on moderate (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P < 0.0001) and severe RAIPWR (RR = 0.14; 95%CI, 0.08 to 0.24; P < 0.00001). When compared to lidocaine, the preventive effect was not so excellent as the latter but injection pain induced by prophylactic occurred less. Conclusion The currently available evidence suggested that pretreating with AAs intravenously could alleviate RAIPWR. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42019129776 .
topic Rocuronium
Injection pain
Withdrawal response
Antipyretic analgesics
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-020-00990-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jiawang theefficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yucui theefficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT binliu theefficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianfengchen theefficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiawang efficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yucui efficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT binliu efficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianfengchen efficacyofantipyreticanalgesicsadministrationintravenouslyforpreventingrocuroniumassociatedpainwithdrawalresponseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724584208081354752