The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly

Background: The management of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) has evolved, with emphasis in radiographic features such as posterior displacement. However, the role of advanced imaging in this scenario is still not well defined. Therefore, our objective is to assess the impact of a compute...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomas Zamora, Ianiv Klaber, Joaquin Ananias, Francisco Bengoa, Eduardo Botello, Pedro Amenabar, Daniel Schweitzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019836160
id doaj-73964fc4f7e9436281dec97e97cb19f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73964fc4f7e9436281dec97e97cb19f02020-11-25T03:08:24ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902019-03-012710.1177/2309499019836160The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderlyTomas ZamoraIaniv KlaberJoaquin AnaniasFrancisco BengoaEduardo BotelloPedro AmenabarDaniel SchweitzerBackground: The management of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) has evolved, with emphasis in radiographic features such as posterior displacement. However, the role of advanced imaging in this scenario is still not well defined. Therefore, our objective is to assess the impact of a computed tomography scan (CT) on interobserver agreement (IA) of fracture classification, posterior tilt measurement, and treatment decisions in nondisplaced FNF in elderly patients. Methods: Eleven patients with a nondisplaced (Garden 1–2) FNF were assessed by six hip surgeons. On a first stage, fracture classification, posterior tilt, and treatment plan (fixation/arthroplasty) were determined only with clinical information and X-rays. On a second stage, a CT was added. The kappa coefficient ( κ ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine IA. Results: IA for Garden classification was only slight in X-rays and with the addition of a CT, with a κ = 0.13 (0–0.28) and 0.18 (0.03–0.33), respectively. Conversely, posterior tilt measurement agreement was excellent in both schemes, with an ICC = 0.92 (0.83–0.98) and 0.92 (0.82–0.98). The IA for the proposed treatment was slight with X-rays ( κ = 0.44; 0.29–0.6), but moderate with the addition of a CT scan ( κ = 0.67; 0.52–0.82). Changes in surgical decision where made in 14 of 66 evaluations with an OR = 1.4 (0.62–3.2) for choosing an arthroplasty if a CT was used. Conclusion: IA for fracture classification and posterior tilt evaluation in nondisplaced FNF was not altered by the usage of a CT. There is improvement in treatment agreement when a CT scan is added to conventional imaging, with changes in treatment in 21% of cases.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019836160
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomas Zamora
Ianiv Klaber
Joaquin Ananias
Francisco Bengoa
Eduardo Botello
Pedro Amenabar
Daniel Schweitzer
spellingShingle Tomas Zamora
Ianiv Klaber
Joaquin Ananias
Francisco Bengoa
Eduardo Botello
Pedro Amenabar
Daniel Schweitzer
The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Tomas Zamora
Ianiv Klaber
Joaquin Ananias
Francisco Bengoa
Eduardo Botello
Pedro Amenabar
Daniel Schweitzer
author_sort Tomas Zamora
title The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
title_short The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
title_full The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
title_fullStr The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
title_full_unstemmed The influence of the CT scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
title_sort influence of the ct scan in the evaluation and treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Background: The management of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) has evolved, with emphasis in radiographic features such as posterior displacement. However, the role of advanced imaging in this scenario is still not well defined. Therefore, our objective is to assess the impact of a computed tomography scan (CT) on interobserver agreement (IA) of fracture classification, posterior tilt measurement, and treatment decisions in nondisplaced FNF in elderly patients. Methods: Eleven patients with a nondisplaced (Garden 1–2) FNF were assessed by six hip surgeons. On a first stage, fracture classification, posterior tilt, and treatment plan (fixation/arthroplasty) were determined only with clinical information and X-rays. On a second stage, a CT was added. The kappa coefficient ( κ ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine IA. Results: IA for Garden classification was only slight in X-rays and with the addition of a CT, with a κ = 0.13 (0–0.28) and 0.18 (0.03–0.33), respectively. Conversely, posterior tilt measurement agreement was excellent in both schemes, with an ICC = 0.92 (0.83–0.98) and 0.92 (0.82–0.98). The IA for the proposed treatment was slight with X-rays ( κ = 0.44; 0.29–0.6), but moderate with the addition of a CT scan ( κ = 0.67; 0.52–0.82). Changes in surgical decision where made in 14 of 66 evaluations with an OR = 1.4 (0.62–3.2) for choosing an arthroplasty if a CT was used. Conclusion: IA for fracture classification and posterior tilt evaluation in nondisplaced FNF was not altered by the usage of a CT. There is improvement in treatment agreement when a CT scan is added to conventional imaging, with changes in treatment in 21% of cases.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019836160
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszamora theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT ianivklaber theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT joaquinananias theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT franciscobengoa theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT eduardobotello theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT pedroamenabar theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT danielschweitzer theinfluenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT tomaszamora influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT ianivklaber influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT joaquinananias influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT franciscobengoa influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT eduardobotello influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT pedroamenabar influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
AT danielschweitzer influenceofthectscanintheevaluationandtreatmentofnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesintheelderly
_version_ 1724666677880160256