Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest
Abstract Brazil became a reference case of social participation after the success of participatory budgeting during the early 90s. The standard theory of the success of participation points to its positive impact on the political system. However, since 2013 Brazil has been experiencing some importan...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
|
Series: | Opinião Pública |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-62762017000100043&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-73928d05e3d54a5e9dcdb3af836c9809 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-73928d05e3d54a5e9dcdb3af836c98092020-11-24T22:01:40ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasOpinião Pública1807-0191231435910.1590/1807-0191201723143S0104-62762017000100043Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protestLeonardo AvritzerAbstract Brazil became a reference case of social participation after the success of participatory budgeting during the early 90s. The standard theory of the success of participation points to its positive impact on the political system. However, since 2013 Brazil has been experiencing some important changes regarding both participation and representation. In regard to representation, the strengthening of conservative forces in Congress is taking place because of a large increase in private financing. We are also seeing that participation alone cannot change the composition of the system of representation. The events that occurred in Brazil in June 2013, which led to changes in the patterns of social participation, have attracted attention worldwide. The aim of this paper is to analyze these changes in Brazil and point out how they influenced the country’s political system and impacted the organization of Brazilian democracy. The data show how MPL presented its demands without politicizing them, keeping itself a single-issue movement (Figure 1). They also show how MBL politicized the movement (Figure 2), transforming it into an anti-corruption movement positioned against president Dilma Rousseff.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-62762017000100043&lng=en&tlng=enparticipation socialejuin 2013changement dans le modèle d’associationmouvements conservateurs |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leonardo Avritzer |
spellingShingle |
Leonardo Avritzer Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest Opinião Pública participation sociale juin 2013 changement dans le modèle d’association mouvements conservateurs |
author_facet |
Leonardo Avritzer |
author_sort |
Leonardo Avritzer |
title |
Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest |
title_short |
Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest |
title_full |
Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest |
title_fullStr |
Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest |
title_full_unstemmed |
Participation in democratic Brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest |
title_sort |
participation in democratic brazil: from popular hegemony and innovation to middle-class protest |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Opinião Pública |
issn |
1807-0191 |
description |
Abstract Brazil became a reference case of social participation after the success of participatory budgeting during the early 90s. The standard theory of the success of participation points to its positive impact on the political system. However, since 2013 Brazil has been experiencing some important changes regarding both participation and representation. In regard to representation, the strengthening of conservative forces in Congress is taking place because of a large increase in private financing. We are also seeing that participation alone cannot change the composition of the system of representation. The events that occurred in Brazil in June 2013, which led to changes in the patterns of social participation, have attracted attention worldwide. The aim of this paper is to analyze these changes in Brazil and point out how they influenced the country’s political system and impacted the organization of Brazilian democracy. The data show how MPL presented its demands without politicizing them, keeping itself a single-issue movement (Figure 1). They also show how MBL politicized the movement (Figure 2), transforming it into an anti-corruption movement positioned against president Dilma Rousseff. |
topic |
participation sociale juin 2013 changement dans le modèle d’association mouvements conservateurs |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-62762017000100043&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leonardoavritzer participationindemocraticbrazilfrompopularhegemonyandinnovationtomiddleclassprotest |
_version_ |
1725839103669305344 |