The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception

The purpose of the present article is to try and give a brief, scientific perspective on several issues raised in the Philosophy of Perception literature. This perspective gives a central role to the brain mechanisms that underlie perception: a percept is something that emerges when the brain is act...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Konstantinos Moutoussis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01357/full
id doaj-73816b3a098d474284a5bcb105108ab9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73816b3a098d474284a5bcb105108ab92020-11-24T23:23:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-09-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.01357212594The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perceptionKonstantinos Moutoussis0National and Kapodistrian University of AthensThe purpose of the present article is to try and give a brief, scientific perspective on several issues raised in the Philosophy of Perception literature. This perspective gives a central role to the brain mechanisms that underlie perception: a percept is something that emerges when the brain is activated in a certain way and thus all perceptual experiences (whether veridical, illusory, or hallucinatory) have a common cause behind them, namely a given brain-activation pattern. What distinguishes between different cases of perception is what has caused this activation pattern, i.e. something very separate and very different from the perceptual experience itself. It is argued that separating the perceptual event from its hypothetical content, a direct consequence of the way everyday language is structured, creates unnecessary ontological complications regarding the nature of the hypothetical ‘object’ of perception. A clear distinction between the physical properties of the real world on the one hand (e.g. wavelength reflectance), and the psychological properties of perceptual experiences on the other (e.g. colour) is clearly made. Finally, although perception is a way of acquiring knowledge/information about the world, this acquisition should be considered as a cognitive process which is separate to and follows perception. Therefore, the latter should remain neutral with respect to the ‘correctness’ or ‘truth’ of the knowledge acquired.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01357/fullBrainPerceptionPhilosophyPsychologyNeuroscience
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Konstantinos Moutoussis
spellingShingle Konstantinos Moutoussis
The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
Frontiers in Psychology
Brain
Perception
Philosophy
Psychology
Neuroscience
author_facet Konstantinos Moutoussis
author_sort Konstantinos Moutoussis
title The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
title_short The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
title_full The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
title_fullStr The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
title_full_unstemmed The machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
title_sort machine behind the stage: a neurobiological approach towards theoretical issues of sensory perception
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-09-01
description The purpose of the present article is to try and give a brief, scientific perspective on several issues raised in the Philosophy of Perception literature. This perspective gives a central role to the brain mechanisms that underlie perception: a percept is something that emerges when the brain is activated in a certain way and thus all perceptual experiences (whether veridical, illusory, or hallucinatory) have a common cause behind them, namely a given brain-activation pattern. What distinguishes between different cases of perception is what has caused this activation pattern, i.e. something very separate and very different from the perceptual experience itself. It is argued that separating the perceptual event from its hypothetical content, a direct consequence of the way everyday language is structured, creates unnecessary ontological complications regarding the nature of the hypothetical ‘object’ of perception. A clear distinction between the physical properties of the real world on the one hand (e.g. wavelength reflectance), and the psychological properties of perceptual experiences on the other (e.g. colour) is clearly made. Finally, although perception is a way of acquiring knowledge/information about the world, this acquisition should be considered as a cognitive process which is separate to and follows perception. Therefore, the latter should remain neutral with respect to the ‘correctness’ or ‘truth’ of the knowledge acquired.
topic Brain
Perception
Philosophy
Psychology
Neuroscience
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01357/full
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinosmoutoussis themachinebehindthestageaneurobiologicalapproachtowardstheoreticalissuesofsensoryperception
AT konstantinosmoutoussis machinebehindthestageaneurobiologicalapproachtowardstheoreticalissuesofsensoryperception
_version_ 1725565289912860672