A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon

Objective: To present the transition from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) over 10 years in a medium volume center by a single surgeon. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 140 prostate cancer patients who underwent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chin Chan, Allen W. Chiu, Marcelo Chen, Jong-Ming Hsu, Stone Yang, Wun-Rong Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-06-01
Series:Urological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879522617300337
id doaj-737c198a02334f55865681b6e4aa41a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-737c198a02334f55865681b6e4aa41a22020-11-24T23:23:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrological Science1879-52262017-06-01282717410.1016/j.urols.2017.03.005A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeonChin Chan0Allen W. Chiu1Marcelo Chen2Jong-Ming Hsu3Stone Yang4Wun-Rong Lin5Department of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanObjective: To present the transition from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) over 10 years in a medium volume center by a single surgeon. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 140 prostate cancer patients who underwent LRP (100 patients) or RALP (40 patients) between May 2005 and May 2015. Preoperative parameters included age, body mass index, and serum prostate specific antigen. Operative course parameters included operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery, hospitalization days, duration of Foley catheterization, and complications. Pathological stage, surgical margin status, biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate, and continence rate at 12 months after surgery were reviewed and compared between the LRP and RALP groups. Result: The operative outcomes revealed significantly less blood loss (143 mL vs. 306 mL, p<0.001), shorter hospital stay (6.9 days vs. 8.7 days, p=0.006), and shorter duration of Foley catheterization (9.3 days vs. 11.3 days, p<0.001) in patients who underwent RALP. Major perioperative complications occurred in four LRP patients (4%), and none were observed in RALP patients. LRP and RALP had similar positive surgical margin rates (p=0.285) and BCR rates (p=0.88). RALP resulted in better continence recovery than LRP (55% vs. 82.5%, p=0.003). Conclusion: Patients who underwent RALP had better perioperative and functional outcomes. Oncologic outcomes were similar compared to patients who underwent LRP.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879522617300337Laparoscopic surgeryprostate cancerradical prostatectomyrobotic surgery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chin Chan
Allen W. Chiu
Marcelo Chen
Jong-Ming Hsu
Stone Yang
Wun-Rong Lin
spellingShingle Chin Chan
Allen W. Chiu
Marcelo Chen
Jong-Ming Hsu
Stone Yang
Wun-Rong Lin
A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
Urological Science
Laparoscopic surgery
prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy
robotic surgery
author_facet Chin Chan
Allen W. Chiu
Marcelo Chen
Jong-Ming Hsu
Stone Yang
Wun-Rong Lin
author_sort Chin Chan
title A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
title_short A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
title_full A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
title_fullStr A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
title_sort comparative study of laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Urological Science
issn 1879-5226
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Objective: To present the transition from laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) over 10 years in a medium volume center by a single surgeon. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 140 prostate cancer patients who underwent LRP (100 patients) or RALP (40 patients) between May 2005 and May 2015. Preoperative parameters included age, body mass index, and serum prostate specific antigen. Operative course parameters included operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery, hospitalization days, duration of Foley catheterization, and complications. Pathological stage, surgical margin status, biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate, and continence rate at 12 months after surgery were reviewed and compared between the LRP and RALP groups. Result: The operative outcomes revealed significantly less blood loss (143 mL vs. 306 mL, p<0.001), shorter hospital stay (6.9 days vs. 8.7 days, p=0.006), and shorter duration of Foley catheterization (9.3 days vs. 11.3 days, p<0.001) in patients who underwent RALP. Major perioperative complications occurred in four LRP patients (4%), and none were observed in RALP patients. LRP and RALP had similar positive surgical margin rates (p=0.285) and BCR rates (p=0.88). RALP resulted in better continence recovery than LRP (55% vs. 82.5%, p=0.003). Conclusion: Patients who underwent RALP had better perioperative and functional outcomes. Oncologic outcomes were similar compared to patients who underwent LRP.
topic Laparoscopic surgery
prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy
robotic surgery
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879522617300337
work_keys_str_mv AT chinchan acomparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT allenwchiu acomparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT marcelochen acomparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT jongminghsu acomparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT stoneyang acomparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT wunronglin acomparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT chinchan comparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT allenwchiu comparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT marcelochen comparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT jongminghsu comparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT stoneyang comparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
AT wunronglin comparativestudyoflaparoscopicandroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyperformedbyasinglesurgeon
_version_ 1725562816650280960