Aftereffect and Reproducibility of Three Excitatory Repetitive TMS Protocols for a Response Inhibition Task

• Main Authors: Gong-Jun Ji, Jun-Jie Wei, Tingting Liu, Dandan Li, Chunyan Zhu, Fengqiong Yu, Yanghua Tian, Kai Wang, Lei Zhang, Panpan Hu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01
• Series: Frontiers in Neuroscience
• Subjects: intermittent theta-burst stimulation; reproducibility; response inhibition; stop signal task; transcranial magnetic stimulation
• Online Access: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.01155/full

A number of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols have been developed for modulating brain function non-invasively. To identify the most powerful one, these protocols have been compared in the context of the motor system. However, to what extent the conclusions could be generalized to high-level functions is largely unknown. In this study, we compared the modulatory effect of three excitatory rTMS protocols on high-level cognition represented by response inhibition ability. Our first experiment revealed that intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) could significantly improve reaction time in a stop signal task, while 5-Hz and 25-Hz stimuli were ineffective. This iTBS effect was significantly higher than that for the sham simulation and only occurred in the second session of the stop signal task after iTBS in the first experiment. However, this aftereffect of iTBS was not reproduced in the second experiment, indicating high variability across subjects. Thus, on the one hand, our findings indicate that iTBS on the pre-SMA could improve inhibitory control, but on the other hand, the reliability and reproducibility of this effect needs further investigation.