Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous electrophysiological studies have identified a "voice specific response" (VSR) peaking around 320 ms after stimulus onset, a latency markedly longer than the 70 ms needed to discriminate living from non-living soun...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Neuroscience |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/127 |
id |
doaj-7372fef7e4974c028804bbd166cb731d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7372fef7e4974c028804bbd166cb731d2020-11-24T22:13:39ZengBMCBMC Neuroscience1471-22022009-10-0110112710.1186/1471-2202-10-127Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voicesFillion-Bilodeau SarahLatinus MarianneQuiñones IleanaRousselet Guillaume APernet Cyril RCharest IanChartrand Jean-PierreBelin Pascal<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous electrophysiological studies have identified a "voice specific response" (VSR) peaking around 320 ms after stimulus onset, a latency markedly longer than the 70 ms needed to discriminate living from non-living sound sources and the 150 ms to 200 ms needed for the processing of voice paralinguistic qualities. In the present study, we investigated whether an early electrophysiological difference between voice and non-voice stimuli could be observed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>ERPs were recorded from 32 healthy volunteers who listened to 200 ms long stimuli from three sound categories - voices, bird songs and environmental sounds - whilst performing a pure-tone detection task. ERP analyses revealed voice/non-voice amplitude differences emerging as early as 164 ms post stimulus onset and peaking around 200 ms on fronto-temporal (positivity) and occipital (negativity) electrodes.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our electrophysiological results suggest a rapid brain discrimination of sounds of voice, termed the "fronto-temporal positivity to voices" (FTPV), at latencies comparable to the well-known face-preferential N170.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/127 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fillion-Bilodeau Sarah Latinus Marianne Quiñones Ileana Rousselet Guillaume A Pernet Cyril R Charest Ian Chartrand Jean-Pierre Belin Pascal |
spellingShingle |
Fillion-Bilodeau Sarah Latinus Marianne Quiñones Ileana Rousselet Guillaume A Pernet Cyril R Charest Ian Chartrand Jean-Pierre Belin Pascal Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices BMC Neuroscience |
author_facet |
Fillion-Bilodeau Sarah Latinus Marianne Quiñones Ileana Rousselet Guillaume A Pernet Cyril R Charest Ian Chartrand Jean-Pierre Belin Pascal |
author_sort |
Fillion-Bilodeau Sarah |
title |
Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices |
title_short |
Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices |
title_full |
Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices |
title_fullStr |
Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices |
title_sort |
electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Neuroscience |
issn |
1471-2202 |
publishDate |
2009-10-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous electrophysiological studies have identified a "voice specific response" (VSR) peaking around 320 ms after stimulus onset, a latency markedly longer than the 70 ms needed to discriminate living from non-living sound sources and the 150 ms to 200 ms needed for the processing of voice paralinguistic qualities. In the present study, we investigated whether an early electrophysiological difference between voice and non-voice stimuli could be observed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>ERPs were recorded from 32 healthy volunteers who listened to 200 ms long stimuli from three sound categories - voices, bird songs and environmental sounds - whilst performing a pure-tone detection task. ERP analyses revealed voice/non-voice amplitude differences emerging as early as 164 ms post stimulus onset and peaking around 200 ms on fronto-temporal (positivity) and occipital (negativity) electrodes.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our electrophysiological results suggest a rapid brain discrimination of sounds of voice, termed the "fronto-temporal positivity to voices" (FTPV), at latencies comparable to the well-known face-preferential N170.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/127 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fillionbilodeausarah electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT latinusmarianne electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT quinonesileana electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT rousseletguillaumea electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT pernetcyrilr electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT charestian electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT chartrandjeanpierre electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices AT belinpascal electrophysiologicalevidenceforanearlyprocessingofhumanvoices |
_version_ |
1725800199303987200 |