Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries

Data from self-report tools cannot be readily compared between cultures due to culturally specific ways of using a response scale. As such, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a suitable methodology for correcting against this difference. We developed anchoring vignettes for the Big Five Inven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Selina Weiss, Richard D. Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325/full
id doaj-736432fd52b1416db2d4ef1b7d38e17f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-736432fd52b1416db2d4ef1b7d38e17f2020-11-24T20:42:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-03-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325322297Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between CountriesSelina Weiss0Richard D. Roberts1Department of Individual Differences and Psychological Assessment, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, GermanyProExam - an ACT Affiliated Company, New York, NY, United StatesData from self-report tools cannot be readily compared between cultures due to culturally specific ways of using a response scale. As such, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a suitable methodology for correcting against this difference. We developed anchoring vignettes for the Big Five Inventory-44 (BFI-44) to supplement its Likert-type response options. Based on two samples (Rwanda: n = 423; Philippines: n = 143), we evaluated the psychometric properties of the measure both before and after applying the anchoring vignette adjustment. Results show that adjusted scores had better measurement properties, including improved reliability and a more orthogonal correlational structure, relative to scores based on the original Likert scale. Correlations of the Big Five Personality Factors with life satisfaction were essentially unchanged after the vignette-adjustment while correlations with counterproductive were noticeably lower. Overall, these changed findings suggest that the use of anchoring vignette methodology improves the cross-cultural comparability of self-reported personality, a finding of potential interest to the field of global workforce research and development as well as educational policymakers.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325/fullanchoring vignettespersonality scales and inventoriesBig Fivedifferential item functioningcross-cultural differences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Selina Weiss
Richard D. Roberts
spellingShingle Selina Weiss
Richard D. Roberts
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
Frontiers in Psychology
anchoring vignettes
personality scales and inventories
Big Five
differential item functioning
cross-cultural differences
author_facet Selina Weiss
Richard D. Roberts
author_sort Selina Weiss
title Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
title_short Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
title_full Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
title_fullStr Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
title_full_unstemmed Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
title_sort using anchoring vignettes to adjust self-reported personality: a comparison between countries
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Data from self-report tools cannot be readily compared between cultures due to culturally specific ways of using a response scale. As such, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a suitable methodology for correcting against this difference. We developed anchoring vignettes for the Big Five Inventory-44 (BFI-44) to supplement its Likert-type response options. Based on two samples (Rwanda: n = 423; Philippines: n = 143), we evaluated the psychometric properties of the measure both before and after applying the anchoring vignette adjustment. Results show that adjusted scores had better measurement properties, including improved reliability and a more orthogonal correlational structure, relative to scores based on the original Likert scale. Correlations of the Big Five Personality Factors with life satisfaction were essentially unchanged after the vignette-adjustment while correlations with counterproductive were noticeably lower. Overall, these changed findings suggest that the use of anchoring vignette methodology improves the cross-cultural comparability of self-reported personality, a finding of potential interest to the field of global workforce research and development as well as educational policymakers.
topic anchoring vignettes
personality scales and inventories
Big Five
differential item functioning
cross-cultural differences
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325/full
work_keys_str_mv AT selinaweiss usinganchoringvignettestoadjustselfreportedpersonalityacomparisonbetweencountries
AT richarddroberts usinganchoringvignettestoadjustselfreportedpersonalityacomparisonbetweencountries
_version_ 1716822922007412736