Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries
Data from self-report tools cannot be readily compared between cultures due to culturally specific ways of using a response scale. As such, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a suitable methodology for correcting against this difference. We developed anchoring vignettes for the Big Five Inven...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325/full |
id |
doaj-736432fd52b1416db2d4ef1b7d38e17f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-736432fd52b1416db2d4ef1b7d38e17f2020-11-24T20:42:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-03-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325322297Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between CountriesSelina Weiss0Richard D. Roberts1Department of Individual Differences and Psychological Assessment, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, GermanyProExam - an ACT Affiliated Company, New York, NY, United StatesData from self-report tools cannot be readily compared between cultures due to culturally specific ways of using a response scale. As such, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a suitable methodology for correcting against this difference. We developed anchoring vignettes for the Big Five Inventory-44 (BFI-44) to supplement its Likert-type response options. Based on two samples (Rwanda: n = 423; Philippines: n = 143), we evaluated the psychometric properties of the measure both before and after applying the anchoring vignette adjustment. Results show that adjusted scores had better measurement properties, including improved reliability and a more orthogonal correlational structure, relative to scores based on the original Likert scale. Correlations of the Big Five Personality Factors with life satisfaction were essentially unchanged after the vignette-adjustment while correlations with counterproductive were noticeably lower. Overall, these changed findings suggest that the use of anchoring vignette methodology improves the cross-cultural comparability of self-reported personality, a finding of potential interest to the field of global workforce research and development as well as educational policymakers.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325/fullanchoring vignettespersonality scales and inventoriesBig Fivedifferential item functioningcross-cultural differences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Selina Weiss Richard D. Roberts |
spellingShingle |
Selina Weiss Richard D. Roberts Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries Frontiers in Psychology anchoring vignettes personality scales and inventories Big Five differential item functioning cross-cultural differences |
author_facet |
Selina Weiss Richard D. Roberts |
author_sort |
Selina Weiss |
title |
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries |
title_short |
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries |
title_full |
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries |
title_fullStr |
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Adjust Self-Reported Personality: A Comparison Between Countries |
title_sort |
using anchoring vignettes to adjust self-reported personality: a comparison between countries |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Data from self-report tools cannot be readily compared between cultures due to culturally specific ways of using a response scale. As such, anchoring vignettes have been proposed as a suitable methodology for correcting against this difference. We developed anchoring vignettes for the Big Five Inventory-44 (BFI-44) to supplement its Likert-type response options. Based on two samples (Rwanda: n = 423; Philippines: n = 143), we evaluated the psychometric properties of the measure both before and after applying the anchoring vignette adjustment. Results show that adjusted scores had better measurement properties, including improved reliability and a more orthogonal correlational structure, relative to scores based on the original Likert scale. Correlations of the Big Five Personality Factors with life satisfaction were essentially unchanged after the vignette-adjustment while correlations with counterproductive were noticeably lower. Overall, these changed findings suggest that the use of anchoring vignette methodology improves the cross-cultural comparability of self-reported personality, a finding of potential interest to the field of global workforce research and development as well as educational policymakers. |
topic |
anchoring vignettes personality scales and inventories Big Five differential item functioning cross-cultural differences |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00325/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT selinaweiss usinganchoringvignettestoadjustselfreportedpersonalityacomparisonbetweencountries AT richarddroberts usinganchoringvignettestoadjustselfreportedpersonalityacomparisonbetweencountries |
_version_ |
1716822922007412736 |