i-gel™ in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA—ProSeal™ in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients
Introduction: Supraglottic devices have mostly eliminated the need of hemodynamically stressful routine endotracheal intubation for ambulatory surgeries. We aimed to compare hemodynamicslike blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) alterations caused by stress response due to i-gel™ and LMA-ProSea...
Main Authors: | Anjan Das, Saikat Majumdar, Anindya Mukherjee, Tapobrata Mitra, Ratul Kundu, Bimal Kumar Hajra, Dipankar Mukherjee, Prof Bibhukalyani Das |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4113/26-%207890_230114_7890_CE[Ra]_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK).pdf |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy
by: Woo Jae Jeon, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-GelTM with LMA-ProsealTM in Elective Surgeries
by: Ishwar Singh, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01) -
A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
by: Jee-Eun Chang, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study
by: Gurudas Kini, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal
by: Gaurav Chauhan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)