Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices

To evaluate the feasibility of conservation tillage in combination with reduced biocide and fertilization regimes, we conducted a field experiment using conventional and reduced tillage, with or without reduced biocide, and fertilization regimes for growing soybean, sugar beet, and spring wheat in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kae Miyazawa, Hiroyuki Tsuji, Makoto Yamagata, Hiroshi Nakano, Tomomi Nakamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2004-01-01
Series:Plant Production Science
Subjects:
SLA
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.7.77
id doaj-734a217c99a7493bbc5b9b349d4f0c15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-734a217c99a7493bbc5b9b349d4f0c152020-11-24T21:45:46ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPlant Production Science1343-943X1349-10082004-01-0171778710.1626/pps.7.7711644609Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization PracticesKae Miyazawa0Hiroyuki Tsuji1Makoto Yamagata2Hiroshi Nakano3Tomomi Nakamoto4The University of TokyoUpland Agriculture Research CenterUpland Agriculture Research CenterUpland Agriculture Research CenterThe University of TokyoTo evaluate the feasibility of conservation tillage in combination with reduced biocide and fertilization regimes, we conducted a field experiment using conventional and reduced tillage, with or without reduced biocide, and fertilization regimes for growing soybean, sugar beet, and spring wheat in this order for three years. Root biomass and sugar yield of sugar beet did not differ with any combinations of conservation practice. Although leaf biomass was significantly reduced under reduced chemical fertilization (replaced partially with manure compost), it was compensated by a greater specific leaf area. Early crop growth of soybean, and spring wheat was increased to some extent under reduced tillage, which indicated a better nutrient utilization, as well when combined with reduced biocide application. However, reduced fertilization could not supply as much nitrogen as conventional chemical fertilization especially in the combination with reduced tillage. Larger amount or long-term application of organic fertilization may be necessary under reduced tillage compared to the requirement under conventional tillage to compensate for lower rate of nitrogen release from organic matter.http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.7.77Manure compostNitrogen availabilityReduced tillageSLA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kae Miyazawa
Hiroyuki Tsuji
Makoto Yamagata
Hiroshi Nakano
Tomomi Nakamoto
spellingShingle Kae Miyazawa
Hiroyuki Tsuji
Makoto Yamagata
Hiroshi Nakano
Tomomi Nakamoto
Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices
Plant Production Science
Manure compost
Nitrogen availability
Reduced tillage
SLA
author_facet Kae Miyazawa
Hiroyuki Tsuji
Makoto Yamagata
Hiroshi Nakano
Tomomi Nakamoto
author_sort Kae Miyazawa
title Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices
title_short Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices
title_full Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices
title_fullStr Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices
title_full_unstemmed Response of Soybean, Sugar Beet and Spring Wheat to the Combination of Reduced Tillage and Fertilization Practices
title_sort response of soybean, sugar beet and spring wheat to the combination of reduced tillage and fertilization practices
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Plant Production Science
issn 1343-943X
1349-1008
publishDate 2004-01-01
description To evaluate the feasibility of conservation tillage in combination with reduced biocide and fertilization regimes, we conducted a field experiment using conventional and reduced tillage, with or without reduced biocide, and fertilization regimes for growing soybean, sugar beet, and spring wheat in this order for three years. Root biomass and sugar yield of sugar beet did not differ with any combinations of conservation practice. Although leaf biomass was significantly reduced under reduced chemical fertilization (replaced partially with manure compost), it was compensated by a greater specific leaf area. Early crop growth of soybean, and spring wheat was increased to some extent under reduced tillage, which indicated a better nutrient utilization, as well when combined with reduced biocide application. However, reduced fertilization could not supply as much nitrogen as conventional chemical fertilization especially in the combination with reduced tillage. Larger amount or long-term application of organic fertilization may be necessary under reduced tillage compared to the requirement under conventional tillage to compensate for lower rate of nitrogen release from organic matter.
topic Manure compost
Nitrogen availability
Reduced tillage
SLA
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.7.77
work_keys_str_mv AT kaemiyazawa responseofsoybeansugarbeetandspringwheattothecombinationofreducedtillageandfertilizationpractices
AT hiroyukitsuji responseofsoybeansugarbeetandspringwheattothecombinationofreducedtillageandfertilizationpractices
AT makotoyamagata responseofsoybeansugarbeetandspringwheattothecombinationofreducedtillageandfertilizationpractices
AT hiroshinakano responseofsoybeansugarbeetandspringwheattothecombinationofreducedtillageandfertilizationpractices
AT tomominakamoto responseofsoybeansugarbeetandspringwheattothecombinationofreducedtillageandfertilizationpractices
_version_ 1725904363765891072