A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing socie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Briggs David J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:Environmental Health
Online Access:http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/61
id doaj-7340dc7b3de04b25a06d367fbf9ee48a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7340dc7b3de04b25a06d367fbf9ee48a2020-11-24T21:05:34ZengBMCEnvironmental Health1476-069X2008-11-01716110.1186/1476-069X-7-61A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risksBriggs David J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing society are systemic in nature – complex risks, set within wider social, economic and environmental contexts. Reflecting this, policy-making too has become more wide-ranging in scope, more collaborative and more precautionary in approach. In order to inform such policies, more integrated methods of assessment are needed. Based on work undertaken in two large EU-funded projects (INTARESE and HEIMTSA), this paper reviews the range of approaches to assessment now in used, proposes a framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment (both as a basis for bringing together and choosing between different methods of assessment, and extending these to more complex problems), and discusses some of the challenges involved in conducting integrated assessments to support policy.</p> <p>Integrated environmental health impact assessment is defined as a means of assessing health-related problems deriving from the environment, and health-related impacts of policies and other interventions that affect the environment, in ways that take account of the complexities, interdependencies and uncertainties of the real world. As such, it depends heavily on how issues are selected and framed, and implies the involvement of stakeholders both in issue-framing and design of the assessment, and to help interpret and evaluate the results. It is also a comparative process, which involves evaluating and comparing different scenarios. It consequently requires the ability to model the way in which the influences of exogenous factors, such as policies or other interventions, feed through the environment to affect health. Major challenges thus arise. Chief amongst these are the difficulties in ensuring effective stakeholder participation, in dealing with the multicausal and non-linear nature of many of the relationships between environment and health, and in taking account of adaptive and behavioural changes that characterise the systems concerned.</p> http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/61
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Briggs David J
spellingShingle Briggs David J
A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
Environmental Health
author_facet Briggs David J
author_sort Briggs David J
title A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
title_short A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
title_full A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
title_fullStr A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
title_full_unstemmed A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
title_sort framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks
publisher BMC
series Environmental Health
issn 1476-069X
publishDate 2008-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing society are systemic in nature – complex risks, set within wider social, economic and environmental contexts. Reflecting this, policy-making too has become more wide-ranging in scope, more collaborative and more precautionary in approach. In order to inform such policies, more integrated methods of assessment are needed. Based on work undertaken in two large EU-funded projects (INTARESE and HEIMTSA), this paper reviews the range of approaches to assessment now in used, proposes a framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment (both as a basis for bringing together and choosing between different methods of assessment, and extending these to more complex problems), and discusses some of the challenges involved in conducting integrated assessments to support policy.</p> <p>Integrated environmental health impact assessment is defined as a means of assessing health-related problems deriving from the environment, and health-related impacts of policies and other interventions that affect the environment, in ways that take account of the complexities, interdependencies and uncertainties of the real world. As such, it depends heavily on how issues are selected and framed, and implies the involvement of stakeholders both in issue-framing and design of the assessment, and to help interpret and evaluate the results. It is also a comparative process, which involves evaluating and comparing different scenarios. It consequently requires the ability to model the way in which the influences of exogenous factors, such as policies or other interventions, feed through the environment to affect health. Major challenges thus arise. Chief amongst these are the difficulties in ensuring effective stakeholder participation, in dealing with the multicausal and non-linear nature of many of the relationships between environment and health, and in taking account of adaptive and behavioural changes that characterise the systems concerned.</p>
url http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/61
work_keys_str_mv AT briggsdavidj aframeworkforintegratedenvironmentalhealthimpactassessmentofsystemicrisks
AT briggsdavidj frameworkforintegratedenvironmentalhealthimpactassessmentofsystemicrisks
_version_ 1716768284683010048