Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review

Abstract Background Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities affecting mobility. It leads to pain and disability if untreated. The Ponseti method is widely used for the correction of clubfoot. There is variation in how the result of clubfoot management is measured and reported. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tracey Smythe, Debra Mudariki, Hannah Kuper, Christopher Lavy, Allen Foster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8
id doaj-733f02550d7947ed902a75277a454adc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-733f02550d7947ed902a75277a454adc2020-11-25T00:02:41ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742017-11-0118111010.1186/s12891-017-1814-8Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic reviewTracey Smythe0Debra Mudariki1Hannah Kuper2Christopher Lavy3Allen Foster4International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineUniversity of WitwatersrandInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineNuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, University of OxfordInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities affecting mobility. It leads to pain and disability if untreated. The Ponseti method is widely used for the correction of clubfoot. There is variation in how the result of clubfoot management is measured and reported. This review aims to determine and evaluate how success with the Ponseti method is reported in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods Five databases were examined in August 2017 for studies that met the inclusion criteria of: (1) evaluation of the effect of clubfoot management; (2) use of the Ponseti method; (3) original study undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa; (4) published between 2000 and 2017. We used the PRISMA statement to report the scope of studies. The included studies were categorised according to a hierarchy of study methodologies and a 27-item quality measure identified methodological strengths and weaknesses. The definition of success was based on the primary outcome reported. Results Seventy-seven articles were identified by the search. Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 (64%) reported a primary outcome. Outcomes were predominantly reported though case series and the quality of evidence was low. Clinical assessment was the most commonly reported outcome measure and few studies reported long-term outcome. The literature available to assess success of clubfoot management is characterised by a lack of standardisation of outcomes, with different measures reporting success in 68% to 98% of cases. Conclusion We found variation in the criteria used to define success resulting in a wide range of results. There is need for an agreed definition of good outcome (successful management) following both the correction and the bracing phases of the Ponseti method to establish standards to monitor and evaluate service delivery.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8ClubfootCongenital talipes equinovarusPonsetiOutcomeEvaluationTreatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tracey Smythe
Debra Mudariki
Hannah Kuper
Christopher Lavy
Allen Foster
spellingShingle Tracey Smythe
Debra Mudariki
Hannah Kuper
Christopher Lavy
Allen Foster
Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Clubfoot
Congenital talipes equinovarus
Ponseti
Outcome
Evaluation
Treatment
author_facet Tracey Smythe
Debra Mudariki
Hannah Kuper
Christopher Lavy
Allen Foster
author_sort Tracey Smythe
title Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_short Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_full Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_sort assessment of success of the ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-saharan africa: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract Background Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities affecting mobility. It leads to pain and disability if untreated. The Ponseti method is widely used for the correction of clubfoot. There is variation in how the result of clubfoot management is measured and reported. This review aims to determine and evaluate how success with the Ponseti method is reported in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods Five databases were examined in August 2017 for studies that met the inclusion criteria of: (1) evaluation of the effect of clubfoot management; (2) use of the Ponseti method; (3) original study undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa; (4) published between 2000 and 2017. We used the PRISMA statement to report the scope of studies. The included studies were categorised according to a hierarchy of study methodologies and a 27-item quality measure identified methodological strengths and weaknesses. The definition of success was based on the primary outcome reported. Results Seventy-seven articles were identified by the search. Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 (64%) reported a primary outcome. Outcomes were predominantly reported though case series and the quality of evidence was low. Clinical assessment was the most commonly reported outcome measure and few studies reported long-term outcome. The literature available to assess success of clubfoot management is characterised by a lack of standardisation of outcomes, with different measures reporting success in 68% to 98% of cases. Conclusion We found variation in the criteria used to define success resulting in a wide range of results. There is need for an agreed definition of good outcome (successful management) following both the correction and the bracing phases of the Ponseti method to establish standards to monitor and evaluate service delivery.
topic Clubfoot
Congenital talipes equinovarus
Ponseti
Outcome
Evaluation
Treatment
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8
work_keys_str_mv AT traceysmythe assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT debramudariki assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT hannahkuper assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT christopherlavy assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT allenfoster assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
_version_ 1725437146607648768