Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential

<p>Abstract</p> <p>The 'global public good' (GPG) concept has gained increasing attention, in health as well as development circles. However, it has suffered in finding currency as a general tool for global resource mobilisation, and is at risk of being attached to almost...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MacKellar Landis, Smith Richard D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-09-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Online Access:http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/9
id doaj-7318471abe5f41b49df758312820a015
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7318471abe5f41b49df758312820a0152020-11-25T01:56:12ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032007-09-0131910.1186/1744-8603-3-9Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potentialMacKellar LandisSmith Richard D<p>Abstract</p> <p>The 'global public good' (GPG) concept has gained increasing attention, in health as well as development circles. However, it has suffered in finding currency as a general tool for global resource mobilisation, and is at risk of being attached to almost anything promoting development. This overstretches and devalues the validity and usefulness of the concept. This paper first defines GPGs and describes the policy challenge that they pose. Second, it identifies two key areas, health R&D and communicable disease control, in which the GPG concept is clearly relevant and considers the extent to which it has been applied. We point out that that, while there have been many new initiatives, it is not clear that additional resources from non-traditional sources have been forthcoming. Yet achieving this is, in effect, the entire purpose of applying the GPG concept in global health. Moreover, the proliferation of disease-specific programs associated with GPG reasoning has tended to promote vertical interventions at the expense of more general health sector strengthening. Third, we examine two major global health policy initiatives, the Global Fund against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) and the bundling of long-standing international health goals in the form of Millennium Development Goals (MDG), asking how the GPG perspective has contributed to defining objectives and strategies. We conclude that both initiatives are best interpreted in the context of traditional development assistance and, one-world rhetoric aside, have little to do with the challenge posed by GPGs for health. The paper concludes by considering how the GPG concept can be more effectively used to promote global health.</p> http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author MacKellar Landis
Smith Richard D
spellingShingle MacKellar Landis
Smith Richard D
Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
Globalization and Health
author_facet MacKellar Landis
Smith Richard D
author_sort MacKellar Landis
title Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
title_short Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
title_full Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
title_fullStr Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
title_full_unstemmed Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
title_sort global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential
publisher BMC
series Globalization and Health
issn 1744-8603
publishDate 2007-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>The 'global public good' (GPG) concept has gained increasing attention, in health as well as development circles. However, it has suffered in finding currency as a general tool for global resource mobilisation, and is at risk of being attached to almost anything promoting development. This overstretches and devalues the validity and usefulness of the concept. This paper first defines GPGs and describes the policy challenge that they pose. Second, it identifies two key areas, health R&D and communicable disease control, in which the GPG concept is clearly relevant and considers the extent to which it has been applied. We point out that that, while there have been many new initiatives, it is not clear that additional resources from non-traditional sources have been forthcoming. Yet achieving this is, in effect, the entire purpose of applying the GPG concept in global health. Moreover, the proliferation of disease-specific programs associated with GPG reasoning has tended to promote vertical interventions at the expense of more general health sector strengthening. Third, we examine two major global health policy initiatives, the Global Fund against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) and the bundling of long-standing international health goals in the form of Millennium Development Goals (MDG), asking how the GPG perspective has contributed to defining objectives and strategies. We conclude that both initiatives are best interpreted in the context of traditional development assistance and, one-world rhetoric aside, have little to do with the challenge posed by GPGs for health. The paper concludes by considering how the GPG concept can be more effectively used to promote global health.</p>
url http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/3/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT mackellarlandis globalpublicgoodsandtheglobalhealthagendaproblemsprioritiesandpotential
AT smithrichardd globalpublicgoodsandtheglobalhealthagendaproblemsprioritiesandpotential
_version_ 1724980955049885696