Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
ABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
|
Series: | Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442020000100418&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-7317f23570f54f299ff7f77bd6021de3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7317f23570f54f299ff7f77bd6021de32020-11-25T03:03:40ZengSociedade Brasileira de Patologia ClínicaJornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial1676-24441678-47745610.5935/1676-2444.20200036S1676-24442020000100418Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S methodGian Carlos Ramirez-UbillusCarlos Ricardo Neira-MontoyaEduardo Eulogio Sedano-GelvetJoel Fernando Verona-CuevaABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts, such as blood smear and a direct count, using the Neubauer chamber. Objective: To validate the reliability estimate produced by the G&S method. Material and method: One hundred and fifty platelet counts were analyzed in the hematology and emergency laboratories of the Hospital Nacional Docente Madre-Niño San Bartolomé, in Lima, Peru, by four methodologies: one optical platelet count (PLTO), one indirect blood smear count (Indirect), and two direct counts (Direct and G&S). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the groups. Results: A significant difference was observed in the distribution of the four methodologies and, after applying the post-hoc analysis, a similarity between the PLTO and G&S methods was found. Also, the Direct, G&S and Indirect methods showed a positive correlation with the PLTO method. The Bland-Altman test demonstrated that the G&S method presented a high agreement with the PLTO method. Conclusion: The G&S method is inexpensive, easy to perform, and has demonstrated statistical reliability concerning the automated methodology, and is useful for confirming low platelet counts after a suspected error by the automated equipment or when this device is not available for use.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442020000100418&lng=en&tlng=encontagem de plaquetasplaquetasestatísticas não paramétricascorrelação de dadosazul de metileno |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva |
spellingShingle |
Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial contagem de plaquetas plaquetas estatísticas não paramétricas correlação de dados azul de metileno |
author_facet |
Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva |
author_sort |
Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus |
title |
Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method |
title_short |
Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method |
title_full |
Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method |
title_fullStr |
Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method |
title_sort |
validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: g&s method |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica |
series |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial |
issn |
1676-2444 1678-4774 |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts, such as blood smear and a direct count, using the Neubauer chamber. Objective: To validate the reliability estimate produced by the G&S method. Material and method: One hundred and fifty platelet counts were analyzed in the hematology and emergency laboratories of the Hospital Nacional Docente Madre-Niño San Bartolomé, in Lima, Peru, by four methodologies: one optical platelet count (PLTO), one indirect blood smear count (Indirect), and two direct counts (Direct and G&S). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the groups. Results: A significant difference was observed in the distribution of the four methodologies and, after applying the post-hoc analysis, a similarity between the PLTO and G&S methods was found. Also, the Direct, G&S and Indirect methods showed a positive correlation with the PLTO method. The Bland-Altman test demonstrated that the G&S method presented a high agreement with the PLTO method. Conclusion: The G&S method is inexpensive, easy to perform, and has demonstrated statistical reliability concerning the automated methodology, and is useful for confirming low platelet counts after a suspected error by the automated equipment or when this device is not available for use. |
topic |
contagem de plaquetas plaquetas estatísticas não paramétricas correlação de dados azul de metileno |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442020000100418&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giancarlosramirezubillus validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod AT carlosricardoneiramontoya validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod AT eduardoeulogiosedanogelvet validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod AT joelfernandoveronacueva validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod |
_version_ |
1724684465214586880 |