Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method

ABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus, Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya, Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet, Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
Series:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442020000100418&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-7317f23570f54f299ff7f77bd6021de3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7317f23570f54f299ff7f77bd6021de32020-11-25T03:03:40ZengSociedade Brasileira de Patologia ClínicaJornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial1676-24441678-47745610.5935/1676-2444.20200036S1676-24442020000100418Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S methodGian Carlos Ramirez-UbillusCarlos Ricardo Neira-MontoyaEduardo Eulogio Sedano-GelvetJoel Fernando Verona-CuevaABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts, such as blood smear and a direct count, using the Neubauer chamber. Objective: To validate the reliability estimate produced by the G&S method. Material and method: One hundred and fifty platelet counts were analyzed in the hematology and emergency laboratories of the Hospital Nacional Docente Madre-Niño San Bartolomé, in Lima, Peru, by four methodologies: one optical platelet count (PLTO), one indirect blood smear count (Indirect), and two direct counts (Direct and G&S). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the groups. Results: A significant difference was observed in the distribution of the four methodologies and, after applying the post-hoc analysis, a similarity between the PLTO and G&S methods was found. Also, the Direct, G&S and Indirect methods showed a positive correlation with the PLTO method. The Bland-Altman test demonstrated that the G&S method presented a high agreement with the PLTO method. Conclusion: The G&S method is inexpensive, easy to perform, and has demonstrated statistical reliability concerning the automated methodology, and is useful for confirming low platelet counts after a suspected error by the automated equipment or when this device is not available for use.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442020000100418&lng=en&tlng=encontagem de plaquetasplaquetasestatísticas não paramétricascorrelação de dadosazul de metileno
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus
Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya
Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet
Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva
spellingShingle Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus
Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya
Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet
Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva
Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
contagem de plaquetas
plaquetas
estatísticas não paramétricas
correlação de dados
azul de metileno
author_facet Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus
Carlos Ricardo Neira-Montoya
Eduardo Eulogio Sedano-Gelvet
Joel Fernando Verona-Cueva
author_sort Gian Carlos Ramirez-Ubillus
title Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
title_short Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
title_full Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
title_fullStr Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: G&S method
title_sort validation of a new method for estimating low platelet counts: g&s method
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
series Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
issn 1676-2444
1678-4774
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Automated hematology analyzers are able to produce low platelet counts with great precision and accuracy. However, these analyzers may produce erroneous counts due to the presence of interferences. Therefore, additional methodologies are required to confirm platelet counts, such as blood smear and a direct count, using the Neubauer chamber. Objective: To validate the reliability estimate produced by the G&S method. Material and method: One hundred and fifty platelet counts were analyzed in the hematology and emergency laboratories of the Hospital Nacional Docente Madre-Niño San Bartolomé, in Lima, Peru, by four methodologies: one optical platelet count (PLTO), one indirect blood smear count (Indirect), and two direct counts (Direct and G&S). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the groups. Results: A significant difference was observed in the distribution of the four methodologies and, after applying the post-hoc analysis, a similarity between the PLTO and G&S methods was found. Also, the Direct, G&S and Indirect methods showed a positive correlation with the PLTO method. The Bland-Altman test demonstrated that the G&S method presented a high agreement with the PLTO method. Conclusion: The G&S method is inexpensive, easy to perform, and has demonstrated statistical reliability concerning the automated methodology, and is useful for confirming low platelet counts after a suspected error by the automated equipment or when this device is not available for use.
topic contagem de plaquetas
plaquetas
estatísticas não paramétricas
correlação de dados
azul de metileno
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442020000100418&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT giancarlosramirezubillus validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod
AT carlosricardoneiramontoya validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod
AT eduardoeulogiosedanogelvet validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod
AT joelfernandoveronacueva validationofanewmethodforestimatinglowplateletcountsgsmethod
_version_ 1724684465214586880