Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis

Most conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chines...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Houxiang Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2013-01-01
Series:L2 Journal
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tf451nb#main
id doaj-73166f19bedc4266a78fe906a049e53c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73166f19bedc4266a78fe906a049e53c2020-11-24T21:54:13ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaL2 Journal1945-02221945-02222013-01-01526892Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case AnalysisHouxiang Li0Pennsylvania State UniversityMost conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chinese as a foreign language class. The excerpt features a teacher using an IRF sequence to engage her students in a sentence-based translation exercise. I demonstrate how a student initiates a sequence following the teacher’s feedback move to make a negative assessment of the pragmatic soundness of the sentences, thus casting doubt on the teacher's epistemic authority. This initiating action and the subsequent interaction it generates bring contingency into the IRF sequence and create potential learning opportunities. As the teacher contends with the contingency, issues related to epistemic asymmetry and L1 and L2 identities are brought to the surface. Additionally, the potential opportunities to discuss the different pragmatic forces between yao in Chinese and to want in English when used in making requests are missed at multiple sequential junctures. Based on the analysis, I discuss teacher-student epistemic social relations within the IRF sequence and a methodological issue concerning the analysis of missed learning opportunities. I also offer reflection on how CA can be used for pedagogical intervention.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tf451nb#main
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Houxiang Li
spellingShingle Houxiang Li
Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
L2 Journal
author_facet Houxiang Li
author_sort Houxiang Li
title Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
title_short Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
title_full Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
title_fullStr Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
title_sort student initiatives and missed learning opportunities in an irf sequence: a single case analysis
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series L2 Journal
issn 1945-0222
1945-0222
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Most conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chinese as a foreign language class. The excerpt features a teacher using an IRF sequence to engage her students in a sentence-based translation exercise. I demonstrate how a student initiates a sequence following the teacher’s feedback move to make a negative assessment of the pragmatic soundness of the sentences, thus casting doubt on the teacher's epistemic authority. This initiating action and the subsequent interaction it generates bring contingency into the IRF sequence and create potential learning opportunities. As the teacher contends with the contingency, issues related to epistemic asymmetry and L1 and L2 identities are brought to the surface. Additionally, the potential opportunities to discuss the different pragmatic forces between yao in Chinese and to want in English when used in making requests are missed at multiple sequential junctures. Based on the analysis, I discuss teacher-student epistemic social relations within the IRF sequence and a methodological issue concerning the analysis of missed learning opportunities. I also offer reflection on how CA can be used for pedagogical intervention.
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tf451nb#main
work_keys_str_mv AT houxiangli studentinitiativesandmissedlearningopportunitiesinanirfsequenceasinglecaseanalysis
_version_ 1725868208751116288