Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis
Most conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chines...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California
2013-01-01
|
Series: | L2 Journal |
Online Access: | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tf451nb#main |
id |
doaj-73166f19bedc4266a78fe906a049e53c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-73166f19bedc4266a78fe906a049e53c2020-11-24T21:54:13ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaL2 Journal1945-02221945-02222013-01-01526892Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case AnalysisHouxiang Li0Pennsylvania State UniversityMost conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chinese as a foreign language class. The excerpt features a teacher using an IRF sequence to engage her students in a sentence-based translation exercise. I demonstrate how a student initiates a sequence following the teacher’s feedback move to make a negative assessment of the pragmatic soundness of the sentences, thus casting doubt on the teacher's epistemic authority. This initiating action and the subsequent interaction it generates bring contingency into the IRF sequence and create potential learning opportunities. As the teacher contends with the contingency, issues related to epistemic asymmetry and L1 and L2 identities are brought to the surface. Additionally, the potential opportunities to discuss the different pragmatic forces between yao in Chinese and to want in English when used in making requests are missed at multiple sequential junctures. Based on the analysis, I discuss teacher-student epistemic social relations within the IRF sequence and a methodological issue concerning the analysis of missed learning opportunities. I also offer reflection on how CA can be used for pedagogical intervention.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tf451nb#main |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Houxiang Li |
spellingShingle |
Houxiang Li Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis L2 Journal |
author_facet |
Houxiang Li |
author_sort |
Houxiang Li |
title |
Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis |
title_short |
Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis |
title_full |
Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis |
title_sort |
student initiatives and missed learning opportunities in an irf sequence: a single case analysis |
publisher |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
series |
L2 Journal |
issn |
1945-0222 1945-0222 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Most conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chinese as a foreign language class. The excerpt features a teacher using an IRF sequence to engage her students in a sentence-based translation exercise. I demonstrate how a student initiates a sequence following the teacher’s feedback move to make a negative assessment of the pragmatic soundness of the sentences, thus casting doubt on the teacher's epistemic authority. This initiating action and the subsequent interaction it generates bring contingency into the IRF sequence and create potential learning opportunities. As the teacher contends with the contingency, issues related to epistemic asymmetry and L1 and L2 identities are brought to the surface. Additionally, the potential opportunities to discuss the different pragmatic forces between yao in Chinese and to want in English when used in making requests are missed at multiple sequential junctures. Based on the analysis, I discuss teacher-student epistemic social relations within the IRF sequence and a methodological issue concerning the analysis of missed learning opportunities. I also offer reflection on how CA can be used for pedagogical intervention. |
url |
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tf451nb#main |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT houxiangli studentinitiativesandmissedlearningopportunitiesinanirfsequenceasinglecaseanalysis |
_version_ |
1725868208751116288 |