Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy

The paper compares several simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. Type and number of input and output data, limitations of use for different structural typologies, and complexity of use are examined for each methodology to identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Ceroni, N. Caterino, A. Vuoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6771
id doaj-7311c3da7c4240efba077df3d420b3ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7311c3da7c4240efba077df3d420b3ea2020-11-25T03:31:14ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-09-01106771677110.3390/app10196771Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in ItalyF. Ceroni0N. Caterino1A. Vuoto2Department of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale C4, 80143 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale C4, 80143 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale C4, 80143 Naples, ItalyThe paper compares several simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. Type and number of input and output data, limitations of use for different structural typologies, and complexity of use are examined for each methodology to identify the most suitable for assessing the vulnerability of a given class of buildings, based on the available data, the computational effort, and the type of vulnerability judgment. The selected methods were applied to a sample of school buildings located in the province of Naples (Italy). Data were available due to a digital platform and were used to verify the possibility of providing reliable large scale vulnerability judgments based on a reduced set of information, without carrying out additional surveys. The most simplified methods were applied to a sample of about a thousand of buildings, while more detailed methods, needing more information, were applied to a smaller sample. The comparison between the results obtained from different methods allows highlighting advantages and weaknesses of each, so as to identify the convenience in their use according to the specific available information and the objectives of the analysis, finally to evaluate which is more or less safe.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6771seismic vulnerabilityterritorial seismic riskapproximate methods
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Ceroni
N. Caterino
A. Vuoto
spellingShingle F. Ceroni
N. Caterino
A. Vuoto
Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
Applied Sciences
seismic vulnerability
territorial seismic risk
approximate methods
author_facet F. Ceroni
N. Caterino
A. Vuoto
author_sort F. Ceroni
title Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
title_short Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
title_full Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
title_fullStr Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
title_sort simplified seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative analysis with reference to regional school building stock in italy
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2020-09-01
description The paper compares several simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. Type and number of input and output data, limitations of use for different structural typologies, and complexity of use are examined for each methodology to identify the most suitable for assessing the vulnerability of a given class of buildings, based on the available data, the computational effort, and the type of vulnerability judgment. The selected methods were applied to a sample of school buildings located in the province of Naples (Italy). Data were available due to a digital platform and were used to verify the possibility of providing reliable large scale vulnerability judgments based on a reduced set of information, without carrying out additional surveys. The most simplified methods were applied to a sample of about a thousand of buildings, while more detailed methods, needing more information, were applied to a smaller sample. The comparison between the results obtained from different methods allows highlighting advantages and weaknesses of each, so as to identify the convenience in their use according to the specific available information and the objectives of the analysis, finally to evaluate which is more or less safe.
topic seismic vulnerability
territorial seismic risk
approximate methods
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6771
work_keys_str_mv AT fceroni simplifiedseismicvulnerabilityassessmentmethodsacomparativeanalysiswithreferencetoregionalschoolbuildingstockinitaly
AT ncaterino simplifiedseismicvulnerabilityassessmentmethodsacomparativeanalysiswithreferencetoregionalschoolbuildingstockinitaly
AT avuoto simplifiedseismicvulnerabilityassessmentmethodsacomparativeanalysiswithreferencetoregionalschoolbuildingstockinitaly
_version_ 1724572815944843264