Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy
The paper compares several simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. Type and number of input and output data, limitations of use for different structural typologies, and complexity of use are examined for each methodology to identif...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6771 |
id |
doaj-7311c3da7c4240efba077df3d420b3ea |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7311c3da7c4240efba077df3d420b3ea2020-11-25T03:31:14ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-09-01106771677110.3390/app10196771Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in ItalyF. Ceroni0N. Caterino1A. Vuoto2Department of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale C4, 80143 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale C4, 80143 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Centro Direzionale C4, 80143 Naples, ItalyThe paper compares several simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. Type and number of input and output data, limitations of use for different structural typologies, and complexity of use are examined for each methodology to identify the most suitable for assessing the vulnerability of a given class of buildings, based on the available data, the computational effort, and the type of vulnerability judgment. The selected methods were applied to a sample of school buildings located in the province of Naples (Italy). Data were available due to a digital platform and were used to verify the possibility of providing reliable large scale vulnerability judgments based on a reduced set of information, without carrying out additional surveys. The most simplified methods were applied to a sample of about a thousand of buildings, while more detailed methods, needing more information, were applied to a smaller sample. The comparison between the results obtained from different methods allows highlighting advantages and weaknesses of each, so as to identify the convenience in their use according to the specific available information and the objectives of the analysis, finally to evaluate which is more or less safe.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6771seismic vulnerabilityterritorial seismic riskapproximate methods |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
F. Ceroni N. Caterino A. Vuoto |
spellingShingle |
F. Ceroni N. Caterino A. Vuoto Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy Applied Sciences seismic vulnerability territorial seismic risk approximate methods |
author_facet |
F. Ceroni N. Caterino A. Vuoto |
author_sort |
F. Ceroni |
title |
Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy |
title_short |
Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy |
title_full |
Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy |
title_fullStr |
Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simplified Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Comparative Analysis with Reference to Regional School Building Stock in Italy |
title_sort |
simplified seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative analysis with reference to regional school building stock in italy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
The paper compares several simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. Type and number of input and output data, limitations of use for different structural typologies, and complexity of use are examined for each methodology to identify the most suitable for assessing the vulnerability of a given class of buildings, based on the available data, the computational effort, and the type of vulnerability judgment. The selected methods were applied to a sample of school buildings located in the province of Naples (Italy). Data were available due to a digital platform and were used to verify the possibility of providing reliable large scale vulnerability judgments based on a reduced set of information, without carrying out additional surveys. The most simplified methods were applied to a sample of about a thousand of buildings, while more detailed methods, needing more information, were applied to a smaller sample. The comparison between the results obtained from different methods allows highlighting advantages and weaknesses of each, so as to identify the convenience in their use according to the specific available information and the objectives of the analysis, finally to evaluate which is more or less safe. |
topic |
seismic vulnerability territorial seismic risk approximate methods |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6771 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fceroni simplifiedseismicvulnerabilityassessmentmethodsacomparativeanalysiswithreferencetoregionalschoolbuildingstockinitaly AT ncaterino simplifiedseismicvulnerabilityassessmentmethodsacomparativeanalysiswithreferencetoregionalschoolbuildingstockinitaly AT avuoto simplifiedseismicvulnerabilityassessmentmethodsacomparativeanalysiswithreferencetoregionalschoolbuildingstockinitaly |
_version_ |
1724572815944843264 |