Some lessons from scientific practice on its development and growth of knowledge On Feyerabend’s perceptive view in epistemology
Feyerabend generally is known most for his discovery on the helpfulness of breaking rules when they become a hindrance and for the legitimacy of the counter-inductive approach as a way to make fundamental changes in science. But his view about the decontamination of old theories and the implantation...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
AAB College, Pristina
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Thesis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://thesis-journal.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Hajdin-Abazi.pdf |
| Summary: | Feyerabend generally is known most for his discovery on the helpfulness of breaking rules when they become a hindrance and for the legitimacy of the counter-inductive approach as a way to make fundamental changes in science. But his view about the decontamination of old theories and the implantation of new theories’ conception deserves equal recognition. And, of course, his alternative of open instead of closed exchange is invaluable as epistemological contribution. All this together make Feyerabend’s viewpoint very distinct, especially to understand the need of openness as a condition to make easy the scientific development. Those three aspects constitute the originality of Feyerabend’s contribution in the philosophy of science, which will be the focus of this paper. These novelties, as it will be argued, fill respective aspects where previously there were shortcomings, which made possible to clarify epistemologically the understanding and explanation, according to the practice, how the development of science and the growth of knowledge were attained (and as a consequence how they usually go). The approach of the treatise pursues the historical context and the theoretical articulation of Feyerabend’s view, including some critical reflections.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1848-4298 2623-8381 |