Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
Abstract Scientists often debate on the evolving state of their fields and future research directions, but empirical studies on research trends are rare and this limits our capacity to disentangle perceptions from facts within the mass of available data. We used ecological and paleolimnological appr...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Limnology and Oceanography Letters |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10131 |
id |
doaj-73105f83714f4dca95552ccb08e55080 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-73105f83714f4dca95552ccb08e550802021-10-01T16:30:31ZengWileyLimnology and Oceanography Letters2378-22422020-04-015220421110.1002/lol2.10131Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?Jean‐François Lapierre0Adam J. Heathcote1Philippe Maisonneuve2Christopher T. Filstrup3Department of Biological Sciences Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec CanadaSt. Croix Watershed Research Station Science Museum of Minnesota St. Croix Minnesota USADepartment of Biological Sciences Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec CanadaNatural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota Duluth Duluth Minnesota USAAbstract Scientists often debate on the evolving state of their fields and future research directions, but empirical studies on research trends are rare and this limits our capacity to disentangle perceptions from facts within the mass of available data. We used ecological and paleolimnological approaches to assess how the “community” of words most commonly used in limnological studies presented at the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography (ASLO) meetings and published in Web of Science have evolved over the last decades. We found that the field of limnology has become increasingly focused on global abiotic research themes, especially in rivers, while there was a decrease in the proportion of organismal studies. We hypothesize that this results from both major influential publications highlighting the importance of framing limnology in a global context and the methodological limitations of organismal studies that prevent data from scaling up as quickly as their abiotic counterparts.https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10131 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean‐François Lapierre Adam J. Heathcote Philippe Maisonneuve Christopher T. Filstrup |
spellingShingle |
Jean‐François Lapierre Adam J. Heathcote Philippe Maisonneuve Christopher T. Filstrup Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? Limnology and Oceanography Letters |
author_facet |
Jean‐François Lapierre Adam J. Heathcote Philippe Maisonneuve Christopher T. Filstrup |
author_sort |
Jean‐François Lapierre |
title |
Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? |
title_short |
Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? |
title_full |
Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? |
title_fullStr |
Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? |
title_sort |
is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global? |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Limnology and Oceanography Letters |
issn |
2378-2242 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Scientists often debate on the evolving state of their fields and future research directions, but empirical studies on research trends are rare and this limits our capacity to disentangle perceptions from facts within the mass of available data. We used ecological and paleolimnological approaches to assess how the “community” of words most commonly used in limnological studies presented at the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography (ASLO) meetings and published in Web of Science have evolved over the last decades. We found that the field of limnology has become increasingly focused on global abiotic research themes, especially in rivers, while there was a decrease in the proportion of organismal studies. We hypothesize that this results from both major influential publications highlighting the importance of framing limnology in a global context and the methodological limitations of organismal studies that prevent data from scaling up as quickly as their abiotic counterparts. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10131 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeanfrancoislapierre islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal AT adamjheathcote islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal AT philippemaisonneuve islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal AT christophertfilstrup islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal |
_version_ |
1716860914441912320 |