Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?

Abstract Scientists often debate on the evolving state of their fields and future research directions, but empirical studies on research trends are rare and this limits our capacity to disentangle perceptions from facts within the mass of available data. We used ecological and paleolimnological appr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean‐François Lapierre, Adam J. Heathcote, Philippe Maisonneuve, Christopher T. Filstrup
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-04-01
Series:Limnology and Oceanography Letters
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10131
id doaj-73105f83714f4dca95552ccb08e55080
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73105f83714f4dca95552ccb08e550802021-10-01T16:30:31ZengWileyLimnology and Oceanography Letters2378-22422020-04-015220421110.1002/lol2.10131Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?Jean‐François Lapierre0Adam J. Heathcote1Philippe Maisonneuve2Christopher T. Filstrup3Department of Biological Sciences Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec CanadaSt. Croix Watershed Research Station Science Museum of Minnesota St. Croix Minnesota USADepartment of Biological Sciences Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec CanadaNatural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota Duluth Duluth Minnesota USAAbstract Scientists often debate on the evolving state of their fields and future research directions, but empirical studies on research trends are rare and this limits our capacity to disentangle perceptions from facts within the mass of available data. We used ecological and paleolimnological approaches to assess how the “community” of words most commonly used in limnological studies presented at the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography (ASLO) meetings and published in Web of Science have evolved over the last decades. We found that the field of limnology has become increasingly focused on global abiotic research themes, especially in rivers, while there was a decrease in the proportion of organismal studies. We hypothesize that this results from both major influential publications highlighting the importance of framing limnology in a global context and the methodological limitations of organismal studies that prevent data from scaling up as quickly as their abiotic counterparts.https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10131
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean‐François Lapierre
Adam J. Heathcote
Philippe Maisonneuve
Christopher T. Filstrup
spellingShingle Jean‐François Lapierre
Adam J. Heathcote
Philippe Maisonneuve
Christopher T. Filstrup
Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
Limnology and Oceanography Letters
author_facet Jean‐François Lapierre
Adam J. Heathcote
Philippe Maisonneuve
Christopher T. Filstrup
author_sort Jean‐François Lapierre
title Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
title_short Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
title_full Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
title_fullStr Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
title_full_unstemmed Is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
title_sort is limnology becoming increasingly abiotic, riverine, and global?
publisher Wiley
series Limnology and Oceanography Letters
issn 2378-2242
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Scientists often debate on the evolving state of their fields and future research directions, but empirical studies on research trends are rare and this limits our capacity to disentangle perceptions from facts within the mass of available data. We used ecological and paleolimnological approaches to assess how the “community” of words most commonly used in limnological studies presented at the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography (ASLO) meetings and published in Web of Science have evolved over the last decades. We found that the field of limnology has become increasingly focused on global abiotic research themes, especially in rivers, while there was a decrease in the proportion of organismal studies. We hypothesize that this results from both major influential publications highlighting the importance of framing limnology in a global context and the methodological limitations of organismal studies that prevent data from scaling up as quickly as their abiotic counterparts.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10131
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanfrancoislapierre islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal
AT adamjheathcote islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal
AT philippemaisonneuve islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal
AT christophertfilstrup islimnologybecomingincreasinglyabioticriverineandglobal
_version_ 1716860914441912320