Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere

<p>It is widely accepted that the atmospheric boundary layer is drastically under-sampled in the vertical dimension. In recent years, the commercial availability of ground-based remote sensors combined with the widespread use of small, weather-sensing uncrewed aerial systems (WxUAS) has opened...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. M. Bell, B. R. Greene, P. M. Klein, M. Carney, P. B. Chilson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3855/2020/amt-13-3855-2020.pdf
id doaj-730f84d7eef54c8dbc0ca4c1a7c2af36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-730f84d7eef54c8dbc0ca4c1a7c2af362020-11-25T03:31:02ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482020-07-01133855387210.5194/amt-13-3855-2020Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphereT. M. Bell0T. M. Bell1B. R. Greene2B. R. Greene3B. R. Greene4P. M. Klein5P. M. Klein6M. Carney7P. B. Chilson8P. B. Chilson9P. B. Chilson10University of Oklahoma, School of Meteorology, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, Center for Autonomous Sensing and Sampling, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, School of Meteorology, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, Center for Autonomous Sensing and Sampling, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, Advanced Radar Research Center, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, School of Meteorology, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, Center for Autonomous Sensing and Sampling, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, School of Meteorology, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, School of Meteorology, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, Center for Autonomous Sensing and Sampling, Norman, Oklahoma, USAUniversity of Oklahoma, Advanced Radar Research Center, Norman, Oklahoma, USA<p>It is widely accepted that the atmospheric boundary layer is drastically under-sampled in the vertical dimension. In recent years, the commercial availability of ground-based remote sensors combined with the widespread use of small, weather-sensing uncrewed aerial systems (WxUAS) has opened up many opportunities to fill this measurement gap. In July 2018, the University of Oklahoma (OU) deployed a state-of-the-art WxUAS, dubbed the CopterSonde, and the Collaborative Lower Atmospheric Mobile Profiling System (CLAMPS) in the San Luis Valley in south-central Colorado. Additionally, these systems were deployed to the Kessler Atmospheric and Ecological Field Station (KAEFS) in October 2018. The colocation of these various systems provided ample opportunity to compare and contrast kinematic and thermodynamic observations from different methodologies of boundary layer profiling, namely WxUAS, remote sensing, and the traditional in situ radiosonde. In this study, temperature, dew point temperature, wind speed, and wind direction from these platforms are compared statistically with data from the two campaigns. Moreover, we present select instances from the dataset to highlight differences between the measurement techniques. This analysis highlights strengths and weaknesses of planetary boundary layer profiling and helps lay the groundwork for developing highly adaptable systems that integrate remote and in situ profiling techniques.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3855/2020/amt-13-3855-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. M. Bell
T. M. Bell
B. R. Greene
B. R. Greene
B. R. Greene
P. M. Klein
P. M. Klein
M. Carney
P. B. Chilson
P. B. Chilson
P. B. Chilson
spellingShingle T. M. Bell
T. M. Bell
B. R. Greene
B. R. Greene
B. R. Greene
P. M. Klein
P. M. Klein
M. Carney
P. B. Chilson
P. B. Chilson
P. B. Chilson
Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet T. M. Bell
T. M. Bell
B. R. Greene
B. R. Greene
B. R. Greene
P. M. Klein
P. M. Klein
M. Carney
P. B. Chilson
P. B. Chilson
P. B. Chilson
author_sort T. M. Bell
title Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
title_short Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
title_full Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
title_fullStr Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
title_full_unstemmed Confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
title_sort confronting the boundary layer data gap: evaluating new and existing methodologies of probing the lower atmosphere
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2020-07-01
description <p>It is widely accepted that the atmospheric boundary layer is drastically under-sampled in the vertical dimension. In recent years, the commercial availability of ground-based remote sensors combined with the widespread use of small, weather-sensing uncrewed aerial systems (WxUAS) has opened up many opportunities to fill this measurement gap. In July 2018, the University of Oklahoma (OU) deployed a state-of-the-art WxUAS, dubbed the CopterSonde, and the Collaborative Lower Atmospheric Mobile Profiling System (CLAMPS) in the San Luis Valley in south-central Colorado. Additionally, these systems were deployed to the Kessler Atmospheric and Ecological Field Station (KAEFS) in October 2018. The colocation of these various systems provided ample opportunity to compare and contrast kinematic and thermodynamic observations from different methodologies of boundary layer profiling, namely WxUAS, remote sensing, and the traditional in situ radiosonde. In this study, temperature, dew point temperature, wind speed, and wind direction from these platforms are compared statistically with data from the two campaigns. Moreover, we present select instances from the dataset to highlight differences between the measurement techniques. This analysis highlights strengths and weaknesses of planetary boundary layer profiling and helps lay the groundwork for developing highly adaptable systems that integrate remote and in situ profiling techniques.</p>
url https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3855/2020/amt-13-3855-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tmbell confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT tmbell confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT brgreene confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT brgreene confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT brgreene confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT pmklein confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT pmklein confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT mcarney confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT pbchilson confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT pbchilson confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
AT pbchilson confrontingtheboundarylayerdatagapevaluatingnewandexistingmethodologiesofprobingtheloweratmosphere
_version_ 1724574111704809472