Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation

In his book Tools for Conviviality (1975), Ivan Illich calls for human self-limitation in technology development. His aim is neither environmental protection nor the prevention of unforeseen side-effects of technology development, but the comprehensibility of technologies’ operating principles for t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beinsteiner Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2020-12-01
Series:Open Cultural Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2020-0013
id doaj-7308368270fe4bb1b1aad98cb4b90bb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7308368270fe4bb1b1aad98cb4b90bb72021-09-06T19:19:47ZengDe GruyterOpen Cultural Studies2451-34742020-12-014113114210.1515/culture-2020-0013culture-2020-0013Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitationBeinsteiner Andreas0Universität Wien, Wien, AustriaIn his book Tools for Conviviality (1975), Ivan Illich calls for human self-limitation in technology development. His aim is neither environmental protection nor the prevention of unforeseen side-effects of technology development, but the comprehensibility of technologies’ operating principles for the user. For if the construction or repairing of tools requires expert knowledge inaccessible to the public, this necessarily entails social imbalances in power. In a similar manner, Bernard Stiegler conceives the delegation of know-how to technological systems as a kind of proletarianization that ultimately may result in a loss of savoir-vivre. Without sweepingly rejecting the division of labour, automation or specialized knowledge, practices of commoning respond to such diagnoses: free software like GNU/Linux or open hardware largely succeed in unlinking the expert knowledge that advanced computing doubtlessly requires from problematic power effects. From this perspective, proprietary algorithms are problematic, as their lack of transparency prevents conviviality. This also holds for the practices of data aggregation and extraction which steadily increase the information gap between platform providers and users. An even more fundamental problem is posed by so-called “self-learning”, i.e., recursively adapting, algorithms: it is not clear how and to what extent the knowledge and instructions generated by “artificial intelligence” can be traced and reconstructed by human insight. Thus, we are confronted with a situation of potentially non-recoverable proletarianization and non-conviviality that exposes a renewed urgency of Illich’s considerations concerning technological self-limitation.https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2020-0013ivan illichbernard stieglerartificial intelligenceproletarianizationalgorithmic transparency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beinsteiner Andreas
spellingShingle Beinsteiner Andreas
Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation
Open Cultural Studies
ivan illich
bernard stiegler
artificial intelligence
proletarianization
algorithmic transparency
author_facet Beinsteiner Andreas
author_sort Beinsteiner Andreas
title Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation
title_short Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation
title_full Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation
title_fullStr Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation
title_full_unstemmed Conviviality, the Internet, and AI. Ivan Illich, Bernard Stiegler, and the Question Concerning Information-technological Self-limitation
title_sort conviviality, the internet, and ai. ivan illich, bernard stiegler, and the question concerning information-technological self-limitation
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Cultural Studies
issn 2451-3474
publishDate 2020-12-01
description In his book Tools for Conviviality (1975), Ivan Illich calls for human self-limitation in technology development. His aim is neither environmental protection nor the prevention of unforeseen side-effects of technology development, but the comprehensibility of technologies’ operating principles for the user. For if the construction or repairing of tools requires expert knowledge inaccessible to the public, this necessarily entails social imbalances in power. In a similar manner, Bernard Stiegler conceives the delegation of know-how to technological systems as a kind of proletarianization that ultimately may result in a loss of savoir-vivre. Without sweepingly rejecting the division of labour, automation or specialized knowledge, practices of commoning respond to such diagnoses: free software like GNU/Linux or open hardware largely succeed in unlinking the expert knowledge that advanced computing doubtlessly requires from problematic power effects. From this perspective, proprietary algorithms are problematic, as their lack of transparency prevents conviviality. This also holds for the practices of data aggregation and extraction which steadily increase the information gap between platform providers and users. An even more fundamental problem is posed by so-called “self-learning”, i.e., recursively adapting, algorithms: it is not clear how and to what extent the knowledge and instructions generated by “artificial intelligence” can be traced and reconstructed by human insight. Thus, we are confronted with a situation of potentially non-recoverable proletarianization and non-conviviality that exposes a renewed urgency of Illich’s considerations concerning technological self-limitation.
topic ivan illich
bernard stiegler
artificial intelligence
proletarianization
algorithmic transparency
url https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2020-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT beinsteinerandreas convivialitytheinternetandaiivanillichbernardstieglerandthequestionconcerninginformationtechnologicalselflimitation
_version_ 1717777842761105408