Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change

Bold approaches to data collection and large-scale quantitative advances have long been a preoccupation for social science researchers. In this commentary we further debate over the use of large-scale survey data and official statistics with ‘Big Data’ methodologists, and emphasise the ability of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily Gray, Will Jennings, Stephen Farrall, Colin Hay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-06-01
Series:Big Data & Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715589418
id doaj-730731d175ca4f608a0890bda929ea5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-730731d175ca4f608a0890bda929ea5e2020-11-25T03:00:24ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172015-06-01210.1177/205395171558941810.1177_2053951715589418Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic changeEmily Gray0Will Jennings1Stephen Farrall2Colin Hay3University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UKUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UKUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UKSciences Po, Paris, FranceBold approaches to data collection and large-scale quantitative advances have long been a preoccupation for social science researchers. In this commentary we further debate over the use of large-scale survey data and official statistics with ‘Big Data’ methodologists, and emphasise the ability of these resources to incorporate the essential social and cultural heredity that is intrinsic to the human sciences. In doing so, we introduce a series of new data-sets that integrate approximately 30 years of survey data on victimisation, fear of crime and disorder and social attitudes with indicators of socio-economic conditions and policy outcomes in Britain. The data-sets that we outline below do not conform to typical conceptions of ‘Big Data’. But, we would contend, they are ‘big’ in terms of the volume, variety and complexity of data which has been collated (and to which additional data can be linked) and ‘big’ also in that they allow us to explore key questions pertaining to how social and economic policy change at the national level alters the attitudes and experiences of citizens. Importantly, they are also ‘small’ in the sense that the task of rendering the data usable, linking it and decoding it, required both manual processing and tacit knowledge of the context of the data and intentions of its creators.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715589418
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily Gray
Will Jennings
Stephen Farrall
Colin Hay
spellingShingle Emily Gray
Will Jennings
Stephen Farrall
Colin Hay
Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
Big Data & Society
author_facet Emily Gray
Will Jennings
Stephen Farrall
Colin Hay
author_sort Emily Gray
title Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
title_short Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
title_full Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
title_fullStr Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
title_full_unstemmed Small Big Data: Using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
title_sort small big data: using multiple data-sets to explore unfolding social and economic change
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Big Data & Society
issn 2053-9517
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Bold approaches to data collection and large-scale quantitative advances have long been a preoccupation for social science researchers. In this commentary we further debate over the use of large-scale survey data and official statistics with ‘Big Data’ methodologists, and emphasise the ability of these resources to incorporate the essential social and cultural heredity that is intrinsic to the human sciences. In doing so, we introduce a series of new data-sets that integrate approximately 30 years of survey data on victimisation, fear of crime and disorder and social attitudes with indicators of socio-economic conditions and policy outcomes in Britain. The data-sets that we outline below do not conform to typical conceptions of ‘Big Data’. But, we would contend, they are ‘big’ in terms of the volume, variety and complexity of data which has been collated (and to which additional data can be linked) and ‘big’ also in that they allow us to explore key questions pertaining to how social and economic policy change at the national level alters the attitudes and experiences of citizens. Importantly, they are also ‘small’ in the sense that the task of rendering the data usable, linking it and decoding it, required both manual processing and tacit knowledge of the context of the data and intentions of its creators.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715589418
work_keys_str_mv AT emilygray smallbigdatausingmultipledatasetstoexploreunfoldingsocialandeconomicchange
AT willjennings smallbigdatausingmultipledatasetstoexploreunfoldingsocialandeconomicchange
AT stephenfarrall smallbigdatausingmultipledatasetstoexploreunfoldingsocialandeconomicchange
AT colinhay smallbigdatausingmultipledatasetstoexploreunfoldingsocialandeconomicchange
_version_ 1724698388832714752