Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model

Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Poranki, C. Goodwin, M. Van Dyke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912
id doaj-7304a255db6c4dc99df6d53cbeab4bf7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7304a255db6c4dc99df6d53cbeab4bf72020-11-24T23:06:23ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/18039121803912Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine ModelD. Poranki0C. Goodwin1M. Van Dyke2Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USAWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAPartial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to reduce burn wound progression. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a modified keratin hydrogel could reduce burn wound progression and speed healing. Standardized burn wounds were created in Yorkshire swine and treated within 30 minutes with keratin hydrogel (modified and unmodified), collagen hydrogel, or silver sulfadiazine (SSD). Digital images of each wound were taken for area measurements immediately prior to cleaning and dressing changes. Wound tissue was collected and assessed histologically at several time points. Wound area showed a significant difference between hydrogels and SSD groups, and rates of reepithelialization at early time points showed an increase when keratin treatment was used compared to both collagen and SSD. A linear regression model predicted a time to wound closure of approximately 25 days for keratin hydrogel while SSD treatment required 35 days. There appeared to be no measurable differences between the modified and unmodified formulations of keratin hydrogels.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Poranki
C. Goodwin
M. Van Dyke
spellingShingle D. Poranki
C. Goodwin
M. Van Dyke
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
BioMed Research International
author_facet D. Poranki
C. Goodwin
M. Van Dyke
author_sort D. Poranki
title Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_short Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_full Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_fullStr Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
title_sort assessment of deep partial thickness burn treatment with keratin biomaterial hydrogels in a swine model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to reduce burn wound progression. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a modified keratin hydrogel could reduce burn wound progression and speed healing. Standardized burn wounds were created in Yorkshire swine and treated within 30 minutes with keratin hydrogel (modified and unmodified), collagen hydrogel, or silver sulfadiazine (SSD). Digital images of each wound were taken for area measurements immediately prior to cleaning and dressing changes. Wound tissue was collected and assessed histologically at several time points. Wound area showed a significant difference between hydrogels and SSD groups, and rates of reepithelialization at early time points showed an increase when keratin treatment was used compared to both collagen and SSD. A linear regression model predicted a time to wound closure of approximately 25 days for keratin hydrogel while SSD treatment required 35 days. There appeared to be no measurable differences between the modified and unmodified formulations of keratin hydrogels.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912
work_keys_str_mv AT dporanki assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel
AT cgoodwin assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel
AT mvandyke assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel
_version_ 1725623320946147328