Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model
Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to re...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912 |
id |
doaj-7304a255db6c4dc99df6d53cbeab4bf7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7304a255db6c4dc99df6d53cbeab4bf72020-11-24T23:06:23ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/18039121803912Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine ModelD. Poranki0C. Goodwin1M. Van Dyke2Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USAWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAPartial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to reduce burn wound progression. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a modified keratin hydrogel could reduce burn wound progression and speed healing. Standardized burn wounds were created in Yorkshire swine and treated within 30 minutes with keratin hydrogel (modified and unmodified), collagen hydrogel, or silver sulfadiazine (SSD). Digital images of each wound were taken for area measurements immediately prior to cleaning and dressing changes. Wound tissue was collected and assessed histologically at several time points. Wound area showed a significant difference between hydrogels and SSD groups, and rates of reepithelialization at early time points showed an increase when keratin treatment was used compared to both collagen and SSD. A linear regression model predicted a time to wound closure of approximately 25 days for keratin hydrogel while SSD treatment required 35 days. There appeared to be no measurable differences between the modified and unmodified formulations of keratin hydrogels.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D. Poranki C. Goodwin M. Van Dyke |
spellingShingle |
D. Poranki C. Goodwin M. Van Dyke Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
D. Poranki C. Goodwin M. Van Dyke |
author_sort |
D. Poranki |
title |
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model |
title_short |
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model |
title_full |
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of Deep Partial Thickness Burn Treatment with Keratin Biomaterial Hydrogels in a Swine Model |
title_sort |
assessment of deep partial thickness burn treatment with keratin biomaterial hydrogels in a swine model |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Partial thickness burns can advance to full thickness after initial injury due to inadequate tissue perfusion and increased production of inflammatory cytokines, which has been referred to as burn wound progression. In previous work, we demonstrated that a keratin biomaterial hydrogel appeared to reduce burn wound progression. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that a modified keratin hydrogel could reduce burn wound progression and speed healing. Standardized burn wounds were created in Yorkshire swine and treated within 30 minutes with keratin hydrogel (modified and unmodified), collagen hydrogel, or silver sulfadiazine (SSD). Digital images of each wound were taken for area measurements immediately prior to cleaning and dressing changes. Wound tissue was collected and assessed histologically at several time points. Wound area showed a significant difference between hydrogels and SSD groups, and rates of reepithelialization at early time points showed an increase when keratin treatment was used compared to both collagen and SSD. A linear regression model predicted a time to wound closure of approximately 25 days for keratin hydrogel while SSD treatment required 35 days. There appeared to be no measurable differences between the modified and unmodified formulations of keratin hydrogels. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1803912 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dporanki assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel AT cgoodwin assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel AT mvandyke assessmentofdeeppartialthicknessburntreatmentwithkeratinbiomaterialhydrogelsinaswinemodel |
_version_ |
1725623320946147328 |