Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening

Objective: To determine the level of acceptance of self Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) examination and to compare the level of sensitivity and specificity of self HPV examination with Fluid Based Cytology on precancerous cervical lesion and cervical cancer. Methods: The analytical method used in thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Chandra, Syahrul Rauf, Umar Malinta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2017-10-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Online Access:http://inajog.com/index.php/journal/article/view/531
id doaj-72dd7b3e4d4247f5b389490eff3353bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72dd7b3e4d4247f5b389490eff3353bd2021-06-02T02:02:54ZengIndonesian Society of Obstetrics and GynecologyIndonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology2338-64012338-73352017-10-0111411910.32771/inajog.v5i2.531531Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer ScreeningRichard ChandraSyahrul RaufUmar MalintaObjective: To determine the level of acceptance of self Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) examination and to compare the level of sensitivity and specificity of self HPV examination with Fluid Based Cytology on precancerous cervical lesion and cervical cancer. Methods: The analytical method used in this research was cross sectional with purposive sampling. This study is conducted at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and its affiliation from October 2014 to May 2015 with 101 subjects. The data measurement used self HPV examination tool and fluid based cytology kit. The data collected through questionnaires before and after the examination. The laboratory examination was carried out using the way of HPV Genotyping primary system (MY09/11) method Wl LTS-06, which is able to detect 35 types of HPV viruses. Results: A total of 101 subjects were involved in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups: the abnormal and normal group (n - 50/51). The acceptance level of self HPV examination was 62.37% (n = 63/101). Majority of subjects (88.21%) were ready to repeat the same examination in the future. The level of sensitivity and specificity for self HPV were (56% (95%CI (41.25 - 70.01%)) vs 98% (95%CI (89.55 - 99.95%)), p=<0.000001, while the level of sensitivity and specificity for fluid based cytology were (40% (95%CI (26.41 - 54.82%)) vs 98% (95%CI (89.35 - 99.95%)), p=0.000002. Conclusion: HPV self-testing is very potential to be used as an alternative method for cervical cancer screening. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 114-119] Keywords: cervical cancer, cervical cancer screening, human papilloma virus, sensitivity, specificityhttp://inajog.com/index.php/journal/article/view/531
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard Chandra
Syahrul Rauf
Umar Malinta
spellingShingle Richard Chandra
Syahrul Rauf
Umar Malinta
Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
author_facet Richard Chandra
Syahrul Rauf
Umar Malinta
author_sort Richard Chandra
title Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_short Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_full Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Human Papilloma Virus Selftesting as an Alternative Method for Cervical Cancer Screening
title_sort human papilloma virus selftesting as an alternative method for cervical cancer screening
publisher Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
series Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
issn 2338-6401
2338-7335
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Objective: To determine the level of acceptance of self Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) examination and to compare the level of sensitivity and specificity of self HPV examination with Fluid Based Cytology on precancerous cervical lesion and cervical cancer. Methods: The analytical method used in this research was cross sectional with purposive sampling. This study is conducted at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and its affiliation from October 2014 to May 2015 with 101 subjects. The data measurement used self HPV examination tool and fluid based cytology kit. The data collected through questionnaires before and after the examination. The laboratory examination was carried out using the way of HPV Genotyping primary system (MY09/11) method Wl LTS-06, which is able to detect 35 types of HPV viruses. Results: A total of 101 subjects were involved in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups: the abnormal and normal group (n - 50/51). The acceptance level of self HPV examination was 62.37% (n = 63/101). Majority of subjects (88.21%) were ready to repeat the same examination in the future. The level of sensitivity and specificity for self HPV were (56% (95%CI (41.25 - 70.01%)) vs 98% (95%CI (89.55 - 99.95%)), p=<0.000001, while the level of sensitivity and specificity for fluid based cytology were (40% (95%CI (26.41 - 54.82%)) vs 98% (95%CI (89.35 - 99.95%)), p=0.000002. Conclusion: HPV self-testing is very potential to be used as an alternative method for cervical cancer screening. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 114-119] Keywords: cervical cancer, cervical cancer screening, human papilloma virus, sensitivity, specificity
url http://inajog.com/index.php/journal/article/view/531
work_keys_str_mv AT richardchandra humanpapillomavirusselftestingasanalternativemethodforcervicalcancerscreening
AT syahrulrauf humanpapillomavirusselftestingasanalternativemethodforcervicalcancerscreening
AT umarmalinta humanpapillomavirusselftestingasanalternativemethodforcervicalcancerscreening
_version_ 1721409413872353280