Delaying gratification depends on social trust

Delaying gratification is hard, yet predictive of important life outcomes, such as academic achievement and physical health. Prominent theories focus on the role of self-control, hypersensitivity to immediate rewards, and the cost of time spent waiting. However, delaying gratification may also req...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura eMichaelson, Alejandro ede la Vega, Christopher eChatham, Yuko eMunakata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00355/full
id doaj-72c5e982bc25491ebae5a1127425a003
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72c5e982bc25491ebae5a1127425a0032020-11-24T23:58:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782013-06-01410.3389/fpsyg.2013.0035548866Delaying gratification depends on social trustLaura eMichaelson0Alejandro ede la Vega1Christopher eChatham2Yuko eMunakata3University of Colorado BoulderUniversity of Colorado BoulderBrown UniversityUniversity of Colorado BoulderDelaying gratification is hard, yet predictive of important life outcomes, such as academic achievement and physical health. Prominent theories focus on the role of self-control, hypersensitivity to immediate rewards, and the cost of time spent waiting. However, delaying gratification may also require trust in people delivering future rewards as promised. To test the role of social trust, participants were presented with character vignettes and faces that varied in trustworthiness, and then chose between hypothetical smaller immediate or larger delayed rewards from those characters. Across two experiments, participants were less willing to wait for delayed rewards from less trustworthy characters, and perceived trustworthiness predicted willingness to delay gratification. These findings provide the first demonstration of a causal role for social trust in willingness to delay gratification, independent of other relevant factors, such as self-control or reward history. Thus, delaying gratification requires choosing not only a later reward, but a reward that is potentially less likely to be delivered, when there is doubt about the person promising it. Implications of this work include the need to revise prominent theories of delay of gratification, and new directions for interventions with populations characterized by impulsivity.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00355/fullDecision Makingsocial cognitionCognitive ProcessesDelay of GratificationIntertemporal choice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura eMichaelson
Alejandro ede la Vega
Christopher eChatham
Yuko eMunakata
spellingShingle Laura eMichaelson
Alejandro ede la Vega
Christopher eChatham
Yuko eMunakata
Delaying gratification depends on social trust
Frontiers in Psychology
Decision Making
social cognition
Cognitive Processes
Delay of Gratification
Intertemporal choice
author_facet Laura eMichaelson
Alejandro ede la Vega
Christopher eChatham
Yuko eMunakata
author_sort Laura eMichaelson
title Delaying gratification depends on social trust
title_short Delaying gratification depends on social trust
title_full Delaying gratification depends on social trust
title_fullStr Delaying gratification depends on social trust
title_full_unstemmed Delaying gratification depends on social trust
title_sort delaying gratification depends on social trust
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2013-06-01
description Delaying gratification is hard, yet predictive of important life outcomes, such as academic achievement and physical health. Prominent theories focus on the role of self-control, hypersensitivity to immediate rewards, and the cost of time spent waiting. However, delaying gratification may also require trust in people delivering future rewards as promised. To test the role of social trust, participants were presented with character vignettes and faces that varied in trustworthiness, and then chose between hypothetical smaller immediate or larger delayed rewards from those characters. Across two experiments, participants were less willing to wait for delayed rewards from less trustworthy characters, and perceived trustworthiness predicted willingness to delay gratification. These findings provide the first demonstration of a causal role for social trust in willingness to delay gratification, independent of other relevant factors, such as self-control or reward history. Thus, delaying gratification requires choosing not only a later reward, but a reward that is potentially less likely to be delivered, when there is doubt about the person promising it. Implications of this work include the need to revise prominent theories of delay of gratification, and new directions for interventions with populations characterized by impulsivity.
topic Decision Making
social cognition
Cognitive Processes
Delay of Gratification
Intertemporal choice
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00355/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraemichaelson delayinggratificationdependsonsocialtrust
AT alejandroedelavega delayinggratificationdependsonsocialtrust
AT christopherechatham delayinggratificationdependsonsocialtrust
AT yukoemunakata delayinggratificationdependsonsocialtrust
_version_ 1725450369158348800