Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction

Purpose: To reveal the effects of the positional and length relationships between the interference screws (ISs) and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel on the fixation strength in ligament reconstruction. Methods: We compared three IS positions on the anterior (the Anterior group) or posterior (the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akira Aoki, Shinji Imade, Yuji Uchio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018822226
id doaj-72bdf74357bd4c4faeb38140fd3f5825
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72bdf74357bd4c4faeb38140fd3f58252020-11-25T03:15:42ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902019-01-012710.1177/2309499018822226Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstructionAkira AokiShinji ImadeYuji UchioPurpose: To reveal the effects of the positional and length relationships between the interference screws (ISs) and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel on the fixation strength in ligament reconstruction. Methods: We compared three IS positions on the anterior (the Anterior group) or posterior (the Posterior group) or side (the Side group) of the tendon graft in relation to the pullout direction. The tendon graft was pulled at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° to the bone tunnel, and the maximum pullout load at each angle was compared among the groups. We also investigated the relationship between the length of the tendon graft and the length of the IS in the bone tunnel. The direction of the pullout force was the same as that of the Anterior group, and the maximum load was compared between groups in which the tendon graft was longer or shorter than the IS. Results: The maximum loads of the Anterior group were significantly greater than those of the Posterior and Side groups at the traction angles of 30° and 60°, respectively. An IS shorter than the tendon graft was found to provide significantly superior fixation strength compared to an IS longer than the tendon graft. Conclusions: Better fixation strength was achieved when the IS was placed on the side of the anchorage tunnel on which the tendon graft was loaded and the IS was shorter than the tendon graft.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018822226
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Akira Aoki
Shinji Imade
Yuji Uchio
spellingShingle Akira Aoki
Shinji Imade
Yuji Uchio
Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Akira Aoki
Shinji Imade
Yuji Uchio
author_sort Akira Aoki
title Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
title_short Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
title_full Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
title_sort effect of the positional relationship between the interference screw and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel in ligament reconstruction
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Purpose: To reveal the effects of the positional and length relationships between the interference screws (ISs) and the tendon graft in the bone tunnel on the fixation strength in ligament reconstruction. Methods: We compared three IS positions on the anterior (the Anterior group) or posterior (the Posterior group) or side (the Side group) of the tendon graft in relation to the pullout direction. The tendon graft was pulled at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° to the bone tunnel, and the maximum pullout load at each angle was compared among the groups. We also investigated the relationship between the length of the tendon graft and the length of the IS in the bone tunnel. The direction of the pullout force was the same as that of the Anterior group, and the maximum load was compared between groups in which the tendon graft was longer or shorter than the IS. Results: The maximum loads of the Anterior group were significantly greater than those of the Posterior and Side groups at the traction angles of 30° and 60°, respectively. An IS shorter than the tendon graft was found to provide significantly superior fixation strength compared to an IS longer than the tendon graft. Conclusions: Better fixation strength was achieved when the IS was placed on the side of the anchorage tunnel on which the tendon graft was loaded and the IS was shorter than the tendon graft.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018822226
work_keys_str_mv AT akiraaoki effectofthepositionalrelationshipbetweentheinterferencescrewandthetendongraftinthebonetunnelinligamentreconstruction
AT shinjiimade effectofthepositionalrelationshipbetweentheinterferencescrewandthetendongraftinthebonetunnelinligamentreconstruction
AT yujiuchio effectofthepositionalrelationshipbetweentheinterferencescrewandthetendongraftinthebonetunnelinligamentreconstruction
_version_ 1724637894492028928