Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases in children visiting a tertiary care eye center in southern India. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 367 children, ≤15 years of age, with si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vimal Krishna Rajput, Naren Shetty, Pritish Raut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2021;volume=9;issue=2;spage=67;epage=70;aulast=Rajput
id doaj-72acf1cba90c482a91b3a03270f8d181
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72acf1cba90c482a91b3a03270f8d1812021-08-09T09:55:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research2320-38972021-01-0192677010.4103/jcor.jcor_9_20Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care centerVimal Krishna RajputNaren ShettyPritish RautPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases in children visiting a tertiary care eye center in southern India. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 367 children, ≤15 years of age, with significant refractive error who visited our tertiary eye care hospital over a period of 1 year. Every child underwent detailed ocular examination. Significant refractive error was defined as myopia of ≥−0.75 diopter (D), hypermetropia of more than +2 D, and astigmatism of more than 0.75 D. Descriptive statistics were computed for better and the worse eye. Statistical tests were applied between the worse and better eyes using Chi-square test. Results: A total of 367 children (38.8%) were diagnosed for the first time of having refractive error. Only 146 (39.8%) children presented with visual complaints. With respect to the vision in the worse eye, 65.9% (n = 240) had moderately subnormal vision. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.057) between age distribution and visual acuity in the worse eye. Two hundred and thirty-eight children (64.9%) had significant astigmatism as compared to 161 myopic (43.9%) children. There was a statistically significant difference between reasons of visit and different age groups. Conclusions: Astigmatism was the most prevalent refractive error and uncorrected astigmatism the most significant amblyogenic factor. Since majority of children, especially in the younger age group, present with nonvisual complaints, involvement of pediatricians and parents will help us to reduce morbidity due to uncorrected refractive error and amblyopia.http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2021;volume=9;issue=2;spage=67;epage=70;aulast=Rajputamblyopianew casesnonvisual complaintsrefractive error
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vimal Krishna Rajput
Naren Shetty
Pritish Raut
spellingShingle Vimal Krishna Rajput
Naren Shetty
Pritish Raut
Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
amblyopia
new cases
nonvisual complaints
refractive error
author_facet Vimal Krishna Rajput
Naren Shetty
Pritish Raut
author_sort Vimal Krishna Rajput
title Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
title_short Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
title_full Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
title_fullStr Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
title_sort epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases of refractive error in pediatric population visiting a tertiary eye care center
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
issn 2320-3897
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical profile, and pattern of refractive error in newly diagnosed cases in children visiting a tertiary care eye center in southern India. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 367 children, ≤15 years of age, with significant refractive error who visited our tertiary eye care hospital over a period of 1 year. Every child underwent detailed ocular examination. Significant refractive error was defined as myopia of ≥−0.75 diopter (D), hypermetropia of more than +2 D, and astigmatism of more than 0.75 D. Descriptive statistics were computed for better and the worse eye. Statistical tests were applied between the worse and better eyes using Chi-square test. Results: A total of 367 children (38.8%) were diagnosed for the first time of having refractive error. Only 146 (39.8%) children presented with visual complaints. With respect to the vision in the worse eye, 65.9% (n = 240) had moderately subnormal vision. There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.057) between age distribution and visual acuity in the worse eye. Two hundred and thirty-eight children (64.9%) had significant astigmatism as compared to 161 myopic (43.9%) children. There was a statistically significant difference between reasons of visit and different age groups. Conclusions: Astigmatism was the most prevalent refractive error and uncorrected astigmatism the most significant amblyogenic factor. Since majority of children, especially in the younger age group, present with nonvisual complaints, involvement of pediatricians and parents will help us to reduce morbidity due to uncorrected refractive error and amblyopia.
topic amblyopia
new cases
nonvisual complaints
refractive error
url http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2021;volume=9;issue=2;spage=67;epage=70;aulast=Rajput
work_keys_str_mv AT vimalkrishnarajput epidemiologyclinicalprofileandpatternofrefractiveerrorinnewlydiagnosedcasesofrefractiveerrorinpediatricpopulationvisitingatertiaryeyecarecenter
AT narenshetty epidemiologyclinicalprofileandpatternofrefractiveerrorinnewlydiagnosedcasesofrefractiveerrorinpediatricpopulationvisitingatertiaryeyecarecenter
AT pritishraut epidemiologyclinicalprofileandpatternofrefractiveerrorinnewlydiagnosedcasesofrefractiveerrorinpediatricpopulationvisitingatertiaryeyecarecenter
_version_ 1721214507509874688