RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation

Information about the research process is gaining importance for research documentation and evaluation. With the increased usage of such research information, the requirements for data quality and interpretation consistency are increasing. An agreed understanding of the concepts of research informat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathias Thomas Riechert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2017-02-01
Series:Data Science Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://datascience.codata.org/articles/612
id doaj-7267a7800e8c4699be441e76287a8261
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7267a7800e8c4699be441e76287a82612020-11-24T22:40:26ZengUbiquity PressData Science Journal1683-14702017-02-0116110.5334/dsj-2017-005608RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition ArgumentationMathias Thomas Riechert0German Center for Higher Education Research and Science StudiesInformation about the research process is gaining importance for research documentation and evaluation. With the increased usage of such research information, the requirements for data quality and interpretation consistency are increasing. An agreed understanding of the concepts of research information is therefore crucial for fair science evaluation and science policy. Initiatives like euroCRIS and CASRAI address this by standardising research information definitions. In this paper, we present an approach to systematically develop and document not only definitions of research information, but also discussed alternatives and related arguments. With that we aim to support existing RI standardisation initatives with a flexible and scalable way of documenting and communicating the standardisation process in order to increase acceptance for the resulting definitions. Our contribution is threefold: Based on the widely used IBIS notation for argumentation modelling, we first introduce semantic rules for defining research information. Secondly, a transformation algorithm is provided to reduce the complexity of those argumentations – without the loss of information – and in turn improve readability of the diagrams. Thirdly, the semantic rules of the resulting less complex RIDAL notation are provided. The presented modelling notations are evaluated in the case setting of the standardisation project for research information of the German science system “Core Research Dataset”.http://datascience.codata.org/articles/612research information definition argumentationresearch information standardisationcomputer-supported argumentation visualisationissue-based information systems (IBIS)wicked problem
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mathias Thomas Riechert
spellingShingle Mathias Thomas Riechert
RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation
Data Science Journal
research information definition argumentation
research information standardisation
computer-supported argumentation visualisation
issue-based information systems (IBIS)
wicked problem
author_facet Mathias Thomas Riechert
author_sort Mathias Thomas Riechert
title RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation
title_short RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation
title_full RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation
title_fullStr RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation
title_full_unstemmed RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation
title_sort ridal - a language for research information definition argumentation
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Data Science Journal
issn 1683-1470
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Information about the research process is gaining importance for research documentation and evaluation. With the increased usage of such research information, the requirements for data quality and interpretation consistency are increasing. An agreed understanding of the concepts of research information is therefore crucial for fair science evaluation and science policy. Initiatives like euroCRIS and CASRAI address this by standardising research information definitions. In this paper, we present an approach to systematically develop and document not only definitions of research information, but also discussed alternatives and related arguments. With that we aim to support existing RI standardisation initatives with a flexible and scalable way of documenting and communicating the standardisation process in order to increase acceptance for the resulting definitions. Our contribution is threefold: Based on the widely used IBIS notation for argumentation modelling, we first introduce semantic rules for defining research information. Secondly, a transformation algorithm is provided to reduce the complexity of those argumentations – without the loss of information – and in turn improve readability of the diagrams. Thirdly, the semantic rules of the resulting less complex RIDAL notation are provided. The presented modelling notations are evaluated in the case setting of the standardisation project for research information of the German science system “Core Research Dataset”.
topic research information definition argumentation
research information standardisation
computer-supported argumentation visualisation
issue-based information systems (IBIS)
wicked problem
url http://datascience.codata.org/articles/612
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiasthomasriechert ridalalanguageforresearchinformationdefinitionargumentation
_version_ 1725704957861036032