On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
he study investigates the interrelationships between different on-line and off-line measures for assessing metacognition. The participants were 47 fifth grade elementary students. Metacognition was assessed through two off-line and two on-line measures. The off-line measures consisted of a teache...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kura Publishing
2012-03-01
|
Series: | International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/201/197 |
id |
doaj-726290e7b0a04e5d8f84428381224f49 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-726290e7b0a04e5d8f84428381224f492020-11-25T02:47:09ZengKura PublishingInternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education1307-92981307-92982012-03-0142301315On-line and off-line assessment of metacognitionSeda Saraç0Sema Karakelle1Yildiz Technical UniversityIstanbul Universityhe study investigates the interrelationships between different on-line and off-line measures for assessing metacognition. The participants were 47 fifth grade elementary students. Metacognition was assessed through two off-line and two on-line measures. The off-line measures consisted of a teacher rating scale and a self-report questionnaire. The on-line measures were thinking aloud protocols and accuracy ratings of text comprehension. The results showed positive significant correlation between data from two off-line measures and negative significant correlation between data from two on-line measures. The off-line metacognitive measures had non-significant correlations with all on-line measures. Principal Component Analysis, performed on four metacognitive measures, yielded a two-factor solution and this two-factor solution accounted for 71.5 % of the sample variance. The data from two off-line measures loaded on the first component with a variance proportion of 38.6 % and the data from two on-line measures loaded on the second component with a variance proportion of 32.9%. The findings of the study showed that metacognitive processes form a complex structure that needs to be assessed using various methods. However, in the multi-method studies, using on-line and off-line measures together will be appropriate rather than using only on-line measures or only off-line measures.https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/201/197Metacognitionon line/off line assessmentthink aloudaccuracy ratingself reportteacher ratings |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Seda Saraç Sema Karakelle |
spellingShingle |
Seda Saraç Sema Karakelle On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education Metacognition on line/off line assessment think aloud accuracy rating self report teacher ratings |
author_facet |
Seda Saraç Sema Karakelle |
author_sort |
Seda Saraç |
title |
On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition |
title_short |
On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition |
title_full |
On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition |
title_fullStr |
On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition |
title_sort |
on-line and off-line assessment of metacognition |
publisher |
Kura Publishing |
series |
International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education |
issn |
1307-9298 1307-9298 |
publishDate |
2012-03-01 |
description |
he study investigates the interrelationships between different on-line and off-line measures for
assessing metacognition. The participants were 47 fifth grade elementary students. Metacognition
was assessed through two off-line and two on-line measures. The off-line measures consisted of a
teacher rating scale and a self-report questionnaire. The on-line measures were thinking aloud
protocols and accuracy ratings of text comprehension. The results showed positive significant
correlation between data from two off-line measures and negative significant correlation between
data from two on-line measures. The off-line metacognitive measures had non-significant correlations
with all on-line measures. Principal Component Analysis, performed on four metacognitive measures,
yielded a two-factor solution and this two-factor solution accounted for 71.5 % of the sample variance.
The data from two off-line measures loaded on the first component with a variance proportion of 38.6
% and the data from two on-line measures loaded on the second component with a variance
proportion of 32.9%. The findings of the study showed that metacognitive processes form a complex
structure that needs to be assessed using various methods. However, in the multi-method studies,
using on-line and off-line measures together will be appropriate rather than using only on-line
measures or only off-line measures. |
topic |
Metacognition on line/off line assessment think aloud accuracy rating self report teacher ratings |
url |
https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/201/197 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sedasarac onlineandofflineassessmentofmetacognition AT semakarakelle onlineandofflineassessmentofmetacognition |
_version_ |
1724754268167077888 |