On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition

he study investigates the interrelationships between different on-line and off-line measures for assessing metacognition. The participants were 47 fifth grade elementary students. Metacognition was assessed through two off-line and two on-line measures. The off-line measures consisted of a teache...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seda Saraç, Sema Karakelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kura Publishing 2012-03-01
Series:International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/201/197
id doaj-726290e7b0a04e5d8f84428381224f49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-726290e7b0a04e5d8f84428381224f492020-11-25T02:47:09ZengKura PublishingInternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education1307-92981307-92982012-03-0142301315On-line and off-line assessment of metacognitionSeda Saraç0Sema Karakelle1Yildiz Technical UniversityIstanbul Universityhe study investigates the interrelationships between different on-line and off-line measures for assessing metacognition. The participants were 47 fifth grade elementary students. Metacognition was assessed through two off-line and two on-line measures. The off-line measures consisted of a teacher rating scale and a self-report questionnaire. The on-line measures were thinking aloud protocols and accuracy ratings of text comprehension. The results showed positive significant correlation between data from two off-line measures and negative significant correlation between data from two on-line measures. The off-line metacognitive measures had non-significant correlations with all on-line measures. Principal Component Analysis, performed on four metacognitive measures, yielded a two-factor solution and this two-factor solution accounted for 71.5 % of the sample variance. The data from two off-line measures loaded on the first component with a variance proportion of 38.6 % and the data from two on-line measures loaded on the second component with a variance proportion of 32.9%. The findings of the study showed that metacognitive processes form a complex structure that needs to be assessed using various methods. However, in the multi-method studies, using on-line and off-line measures together will be appropriate rather than using only on-line measures or only off-line measures.https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/201/197Metacognitionon line/off line assessmentthink aloudaccuracy ratingself reportteacher ratings
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seda Saraç
Sema Karakelle
spellingShingle Seda Saraç
Sema Karakelle
On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
Metacognition
on line/off line assessment
think aloud
accuracy rating
self report
teacher ratings
author_facet Seda Saraç
Sema Karakelle
author_sort Seda Saraç
title On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
title_short On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
title_full On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
title_fullStr On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
title_full_unstemmed On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
title_sort on-line and off-line assessment of metacognition
publisher Kura Publishing
series International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
issn 1307-9298
1307-9298
publishDate 2012-03-01
description he study investigates the interrelationships between different on-line and off-line measures for assessing metacognition. The participants were 47 fifth grade elementary students. Metacognition was assessed through two off-line and two on-line measures. The off-line measures consisted of a teacher rating scale and a self-report questionnaire. The on-line measures were thinking aloud protocols and accuracy ratings of text comprehension. The results showed positive significant correlation between data from two off-line measures and negative significant correlation between data from two on-line measures. The off-line metacognitive measures had non-significant correlations with all on-line measures. Principal Component Analysis, performed on four metacognitive measures, yielded a two-factor solution and this two-factor solution accounted for 71.5 % of the sample variance. The data from two off-line measures loaded on the first component with a variance proportion of 38.6 % and the data from two on-line measures loaded on the second component with a variance proportion of 32.9%. The findings of the study showed that metacognitive processes form a complex structure that needs to be assessed using various methods. However, in the multi-method studies, using on-line and off-line measures together will be appropriate rather than using only on-line measures or only off-line measures.
topic Metacognition
on line/off line assessment
think aloud
accuracy rating
self report
teacher ratings
url https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/201/197
work_keys_str_mv AT sedasarac onlineandofflineassessmentofmetacognition
AT semakarakelle onlineandofflineassessmentofmetacognition
_version_ 1724754268167077888