Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly used for environmental assessment of products and production processes to support environmental decision-making both worldwide and in the Arctic. However, there are several weaknesses in the impact assessment methodology in LCA, e.g., related to uncertaint...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johan Berg Pettersen, Xingqiang Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1605
id doaj-725cff785b7a47a18c1167b8ab13b9d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-725cff785b7a47a18c1167b8ab13b9d72020-11-25T02:29:16ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502017-09-0199160510.3390/su9091605su9091605Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research NeedsJohan Berg Pettersen0Xingqiang Song1Industrial Ecology Programme and Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayFaculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, NorwayLife cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly used for environmental assessment of products and production processes to support environmental decision-making both worldwide and in the Arctic. However, there are several weaknesses in the impact assessment methodology in LCA, e.g., related to uncertainties of impact assessment results, absence of spatial differentiation in characterization modeling, and gaps in the coverage of impact pathways of different “archetypal” environments. Searching for a new resource base and areas for operation, marine and marine-based industries are continuously moving north, which underlines the need for better life cycle impact assessment in the Arctic, particularly to aid in industrial environmental management systems and stakeholder communications. This paper aims to investigate gaps and challenges in the application of the currently available impact assessment methods in the Arctic context. A simplified Arctic mining LCA case study was carried out to demonstrate the relevance of Arctic emissions at the midpoint and endpoint levels, as well as possible influences of the Arctic context on the impact assessment results. Results of this study showed that significant research gaps remain in Arctic-dependent life cycle impact assessment, particularly on: (i) the possible influences of the Arctic-specific features on characterization factors for impact assessment (such as seasonality, cold climate, precipitation, and marine dependence); and (ii) the coverage of impact pathways, especially on the under-addressed marine impacts and marine/near-shore dispersion processes. Addressing those identified research gaps and demand for future Arctic life cycle impact assessment could increase the credibility of LCA as an environmental decision-making support tool for Arctic industries and better support sustainable Arctic development.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1605life cycle assessmentArcticsustainabilityimpact assessmentsite-dependent
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johan Berg Pettersen
Xingqiang Song
spellingShingle Johan Berg Pettersen
Xingqiang Song
Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs
Sustainability
life cycle assessment
Arctic
sustainability
impact assessment
site-dependent
author_facet Johan Berg Pettersen
Xingqiang Song
author_sort Johan Berg Pettersen
title Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs
title_short Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs
title_full Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs
title_fullStr Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs
title_full_unstemmed Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs
title_sort life cycle impact assessment in the arctic: challenges and research needs
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Life cycle assessment (LCA) is increasingly used for environmental assessment of products and production processes to support environmental decision-making both worldwide and in the Arctic. However, there are several weaknesses in the impact assessment methodology in LCA, e.g., related to uncertainties of impact assessment results, absence of spatial differentiation in characterization modeling, and gaps in the coverage of impact pathways of different “archetypal” environments. Searching for a new resource base and areas for operation, marine and marine-based industries are continuously moving north, which underlines the need for better life cycle impact assessment in the Arctic, particularly to aid in industrial environmental management systems and stakeholder communications. This paper aims to investigate gaps and challenges in the application of the currently available impact assessment methods in the Arctic context. A simplified Arctic mining LCA case study was carried out to demonstrate the relevance of Arctic emissions at the midpoint and endpoint levels, as well as possible influences of the Arctic context on the impact assessment results. Results of this study showed that significant research gaps remain in Arctic-dependent life cycle impact assessment, particularly on: (i) the possible influences of the Arctic-specific features on characterization factors for impact assessment (such as seasonality, cold climate, precipitation, and marine dependence); and (ii) the coverage of impact pathways, especially on the under-addressed marine impacts and marine/near-shore dispersion processes. Addressing those identified research gaps and demand for future Arctic life cycle impact assessment could increase the credibility of LCA as an environmental decision-making support tool for Arctic industries and better support sustainable Arctic development.
topic life cycle assessment
Arctic
sustainability
impact assessment
site-dependent
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1605
work_keys_str_mv AT johanbergpettersen lifecycleimpactassessmentinthearcticchallengesandresearchneeds
AT xingqiangsong lifecycleimpactassessmentinthearcticchallengesandresearchneeds
_version_ 1724834139919613952