Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) colonize plants and enhance their growth by different mechanisms. Some of these microorganisms may represent a potential threat to human, animal or plant health; however, their use might be approved in parts of Europe if they have been recommended as plant grow...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01514/full |
id |
doaj-7250de67c1b34e65b40187480fe301e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7250de67c1b34e65b40187480fe301e12020-11-25T00:06:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2016-01-01610.3389/fmicb.2015.01514163230Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocolJuan Ignacio Vílchez0Alfonso eNavas1Jesús eGonzález-López2Susana C Arcos3Maximino eManzanera4University of GranadaCSICUniversity of GranadaCSICUniversity of GranadaPlant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) colonize plants and enhance their growth by different mechanisms. Some of these microorganisms may represent a potential threat to human, animal or plant health; however, their use might be approved in parts of Europe if they have been recommended as plant growth enhancers. The current regulatory framework has resulted in a fragmented, contradictory system, and there is an urgent need to establish harmonized protocols for the predictability, efficiency, consistency and especially the safety of PGPB for human and animal health and for the environment. In response to current efforts to update biosafety policies and provide alternative methods to replace the use of vertebrate animals, we propose a panel of tests and an evaluation system to reliably determine the biosafety of bacterial strains used as PGPB. Based on the results of different tests, we propose a scoring system to evaluate the safety of candidates for PGPB within the limitations of the assays used.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01514/fullEnvironmental HealthHuman healthbiosafetyPGPRindex |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Juan Ignacio Vílchez Alfonso eNavas Jesús eGonzález-López Susana C Arcos Maximino eManzanera |
spellingShingle |
Juan Ignacio Vílchez Alfonso eNavas Jesús eGonzález-López Susana C Arcos Maximino eManzanera Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol Frontiers in Microbiology Environmental Health Human health biosafety PGPR index |
author_facet |
Juan Ignacio Vílchez Alfonso eNavas Jesús eGonzález-López Susana C Arcos Maximino eManzanera |
author_sort |
Juan Ignacio Vílchez |
title |
Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol |
title_short |
Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol |
title_full |
Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol |
title_fullStr |
Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: Proposed Environmental and Human Safety Index (EHSI) protocol |
title_sort |
biosafety test for plant growth-promoting bacteria: proposed environmental and human safety index (ehsi) protocol |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Microbiology |
issn |
1664-302X |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) colonize plants and enhance their growth by different mechanisms. Some of these microorganisms may represent a potential threat to human, animal or plant health; however, their use might be approved in parts of Europe if they have been recommended as plant growth enhancers. The current regulatory framework has resulted in a fragmented, contradictory system, and there is an urgent need to establish harmonized protocols for the predictability, efficiency, consistency and especially the safety of PGPB for human and animal health and for the environment. In response to current efforts to update biosafety policies and provide alternative methods to replace the use of vertebrate animals, we propose a panel of tests and an evaluation system to reliably determine the biosafety of bacterial strains used as PGPB. Based on the results of different tests, we propose a scoring system to evaluate the safety of candidates for PGPB within the limitations of the assays used. |
topic |
Environmental Health Human health biosafety PGPR index |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01514/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juanignaciovilchez biosafetytestforplantgrowthpromotingbacteriaproposedenvironmentalandhumansafetyindexehsiprotocol AT alfonsoenavas biosafetytestforplantgrowthpromotingbacteriaproposedenvironmentalandhumansafetyindexehsiprotocol AT jesusegonzalezlopez biosafetytestforplantgrowthpromotingbacteriaproposedenvironmentalandhumansafetyindexehsiprotocol AT susanacarcos biosafetytestforplantgrowthpromotingbacteriaproposedenvironmentalandhumansafetyindexehsiprotocol AT maximinoemanzanera biosafetytestforplantgrowthpromotingbacteriaproposedenvironmentalandhumansafetyindexehsiprotocol |
_version_ |
1725420912314941440 |